Impact of scientific production of Italian scientists in exercises and sport sciences by measuring the author-weighted h-index.

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frma.2024.1466811
Gaetano Raiola, Giovanni Esposito, Rosario Ceruso, Francesca D'Elia, Tiziana D'Isanto
{"title":"Impact of scientific production of Italian scientists in exercises and sport sciences by measuring the author-weighted <i>h</i>-index.","authors":"Gaetano Raiola, Giovanni Esposito, Rosario Ceruso, Francesca D'Elia, Tiziana D'Isanto","doi":"10.3389/frma.2024.1466811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to measure the consistency of the impact of scientific production, weighted by authorship, of Italian scientists in two academic disciplines (AD) of Exercise and Sports Sciences (ESS) from 2017 to 2022, with a specific focus on the subfield \"Sport Sciences\", using topic-specific keywords. Through the Scopus database, the scientific products of Italian ESS scientists associated with each keyword were identified. Subsequently, total and relative metric parameters from 2017 to 2022 were collected, including the total and relative number of citations. To evaluate the impact of the publications, the total and relative <i>h</i>-index were calculated, and weighted by considering different categories of authorship. Specific weights were attributed to each category: single author, first author, last author and co-author, following the classifications already in use on Scopus for each author. The trends of total and relative metrics, including citations and <i>h</i>-index, from 2017 to 2022 were analyzed using Spearman's correlation. Non-parametric linear regression analysis was used for the predictive analysis of these trends. Among the 83 identified ESS scientists, a detailed analysis revealed that 31.3% were full professors, 42.1% associate professors, and 26.6% researchers. Less than half of these scientists were directly affiliated with ESS. Despite minority representation, significant positive correlations emerge between total and relative citations from 2017 to 2022 (<i>r</i> = 0.687) and between the weighted total <i>h</i>-index and the weighted relative <i>h</i>-index (<i>r</i> = 0.965). Significant trends emerge in the metric parameters of the same scientists when analyzed separately by AD. The regression results indicate that variations in total citations and the weighted total and relative <i>h</i>-index can predict or explain the observed changes in 2017-2022 <i>(p</i> < 0.05). This result suggests that the production and impact of research in the field of ESS follow the same general trend as production and impact in the specific subfield.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"9 ","pages":"1466811"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1466811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to measure the consistency of the impact of scientific production, weighted by authorship, of Italian scientists in two academic disciplines (AD) of Exercise and Sports Sciences (ESS) from 2017 to 2022, with a specific focus on the subfield "Sport Sciences", using topic-specific keywords. Through the Scopus database, the scientific products of Italian ESS scientists associated with each keyword were identified. Subsequently, total and relative metric parameters from 2017 to 2022 were collected, including the total and relative number of citations. To evaluate the impact of the publications, the total and relative h-index were calculated, and weighted by considering different categories of authorship. Specific weights were attributed to each category: single author, first author, last author and co-author, following the classifications already in use on Scopus for each author. The trends of total and relative metrics, including citations and h-index, from 2017 to 2022 were analyzed using Spearman's correlation. Non-parametric linear regression analysis was used for the predictive analysis of these trends. Among the 83 identified ESS scientists, a detailed analysis revealed that 31.3% were full professors, 42.1% associate professors, and 26.6% researchers. Less than half of these scientists were directly affiliated with ESS. Despite minority representation, significant positive correlations emerge between total and relative citations from 2017 to 2022 (r = 0.687) and between the weighted total h-index and the weighted relative h-index (r = 0.965). Significant trends emerge in the metric parameters of the same scientists when analyzed separately by AD. The regression results indicate that variations in total citations and the weighted total and relative h-index can predict or explain the observed changes in 2017-2022 (p < 0.05). This result suggests that the production and impact of research in the field of ESS follow the same general trend as production and impact in the specific subfield.

通过测量作者加权 h 指数,了解意大利科学家在运动和体育科学领域的科研成果的影响。
本研究旨在利用特定主题关键词,以作者身份为权重,衡量 2017 年至 2022 年期间意大利科学家在运动与体育科学(ESS)两个学科(AD)的科研成果影响力的一致性,特别关注 "体育科学 "子领域。通过 Scopus 数据库,确定了与每个关键词相关的意大利 ESS 科学家的科研成果。随后,收集了 2017 年至 2022 年的总指标参数和相对指标参数,包括总引用次数和相对引用次数。为评估出版物的影响力,计算了总指数和相对 h 指数,并通过考虑不同作者类别进行加权。按照 Scopus 对每位作者已使用的分类方法,对每个类别(单一作者、第一作者、最后作者和合著者)赋予了具体权重。利用斯皮尔曼相关性分析了 2017 年至 2022 年总指标和相对指标(包括引文和 h 指数)的变化趋势。对这些趋势的预测分析采用了非参数线性回归分析。在确定的 83 名斯洛文尼亚科学院科学家中,详细分析显示,31.3% 为正教授,42.1% 为副教授,26.6% 为研究员。这些科学家中直接隶属于 ESS 的不到一半。尽管占少数,但从 2017 年到 2022 年,总引文和相对引文之间(r = 0.687)以及加权总 h 指数和加权相对 h 指数之间(r = 0.965)出现了明显的正相关。按 AD 分别分析时,同一科学家的度量参数出现了显著趋势。回归结果表明,总引用次数以及加权总指数和相对 h 指数的变化可以预测或解释 2017-2022 年观察到的变化(p < 0.05)。这一结果表明,ESS 领域的研究成果和影响与特定子领域的成果和影响遵循相同的总体趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信