Correlations Between Disability Score, Optical Coherence Tomography and Microperimetry in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

IF 3.1 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eye and Brain Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/EB.S469182
Carla D Guantay, Laura Mena-García, Miguel Ángel Tola-Arribas, María José Garea García-Malvar, María Isabel Yugueros Fernández, Agustín Mayo-Iscar, José Carlos Pastor
{"title":"Correlations Between Disability Score, Optical Coherence Tomography and Microperimetry in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Carla D Guantay, Laura Mena-García, Miguel Ángel Tola-Arribas, María José Garea García-Malvar, María Isabel Yugueros Fernández, Agustín Mayo-Iscar, José Carlos Pastor","doi":"10.2147/EB.S469182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize ocular motility disturbances through Microperimetry (MP) in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) trying to detect those capable of influencing the disability to improve the accuracy of assessing visual impact in EDSS scale. MP results were compare with some structural parameters obtained by OCT.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analytical and correlational case-control study approved by Ethical Committee. A total of 82 eyes (41 patients) and 30 healthy eyes (15 subjects) were enrolled after informed consent. All participants underwent ophthalmological evaluation with MP and OCT. Variables included MS disease duration, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score; in OCT: central macular thickness (CMT), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (GCIPL), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (pRNFL); and in MP: test duration, reaction time, average macular threshold (AT), and 4 fixation stability indexes (P1, P2, BCEA63, BCEA95).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MS group showed a significant decrease in GCIPL (p < 0.001) and pRNFL thickness (p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Furthermore, patients demonstrated a longer examination (p < 0.001) and reaction (p < 0.001) times, reduced AT (p < 0.001), more unstable fixation indexes (P1 p <0.004, P2 p = 0.018, BCEA63 p = 0.005 and BCEA95 p = 0.007), measured by MP. In addition, patients with a history of ON (n=16) demonstrated longer examination times in MP (p = 0.049) compared to MS patients without ON, but they were not correlations with OCT measurements, EDSS score correlated with the CMT (p = 0.023, r = -0.25), MP duration (p = 0.043, r = 0.22), and fixation indexes (P1 p = 0.049, r = -0.22, BCEA63 p = 0.041, r = 0.23, BCEA95 p = 0.049, r = 0.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study emphasizes the complementary utility of MP and OCT in assessing MS patients. Additionally, it highlights that using MP for objective measurements of oculomotor dysfunction could improves accuracy in disability assessment on the EDSS scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":51844,"journal":{"name":"Eye and Brain","volume":"16 ","pages":"89-100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and Brain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/EB.S469182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize ocular motility disturbances through Microperimetry (MP) in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) trying to detect those capable of influencing the disability to improve the accuracy of assessing visual impact in EDSS scale. MP results were compare with some structural parameters obtained by OCT.

Patients and methods: Cross-sectional analytical and correlational case-control study approved by Ethical Committee. A total of 82 eyes (41 patients) and 30 healthy eyes (15 subjects) were enrolled after informed consent. All participants underwent ophthalmological evaluation with MP and OCT. Variables included MS disease duration, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score; in OCT: central macular thickness (CMT), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (GCIPL), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (pRNFL); and in MP: test duration, reaction time, average macular threshold (AT), and 4 fixation stability indexes (P1, P2, BCEA63, BCEA95).

Results: MS group showed a significant decrease in GCIPL (p < 0.001) and pRNFL thickness (p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Furthermore, patients demonstrated a longer examination (p < 0.001) and reaction (p < 0.001) times, reduced AT (p < 0.001), more unstable fixation indexes (P1 p <0.004, P2 p = 0.018, BCEA63 p = 0.005 and BCEA95 p = 0.007), measured by MP. In addition, patients with a history of ON (n=16) demonstrated longer examination times in MP (p = 0.049) compared to MS patients without ON, but they were not correlations with OCT measurements, EDSS score correlated with the CMT (p = 0.023, r = -0.25), MP duration (p = 0.043, r = 0.22), and fixation indexes (P1 p = 0.049, r = -0.22, BCEA63 p = 0.041, r = 0.23, BCEA95 p = 0.049, r = 0.22).

Conclusion: Our study emphasizes the complementary utility of MP and OCT in assessing MS patients. Additionally, it highlights that using MP for objective measurements of oculomotor dysfunction could improves accuracy in disability assessment on the EDSS scale.

多发性硬化症患者的残疾评分、光学相干断层扫描和微观视力测定之间的相关性。
目的:通过显微视力测定法(MP)描述多发性硬化症(MS)患者眼球运动障碍的特征,试图发现那些能够影响残疾的眼球运动障碍,从而提高 EDSS 量表中视觉影响评估的准确性。MP结果与OCT获得的一些结构参数进行了比较:经伦理委员会批准的横断面分析和相关病例对照研究。经知情同意后,共招募了 82 只眼睛(41 名患者)和 30 只健康眼睛(15 名受试者)。所有受试者均接受了MP和OCT眼科评估。变量包括多发性硬化症病程、扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)评分;OCT:黄斑中心厚度(CMT)、神经节细胞-丛状内层厚度(GCIPL)和毛细血管周围视网膜神经纤维层厚度(pRNFL);MP:测试持续时间、反应时间、平均黄斑阈值(AT)和4个固定稳定性指数(P1、P2、BCEA63、BCEA95):与对照组相比,MS 组的 GCIPL(P < 0.001)和 pRNFL 厚度(P < 0.001)明显下降。此外,患者的检查时间(p < 0.001)和反应时间(p < 0.001)更长,AT 值降低(p < 0.001),固定指数(P1 p 结论:我们的研究强调了 MS 组与对照组的互补作用:我们的研究强调了MP和OCT在评估多发性硬化症患者时的互补作用。此外,该研究还强调,使用 MP 对眼球运动障碍进行客观测量可提高 EDSS 量表残疾评估的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eye and Brain
Eye and Brain OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye and Brain is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on basic research, clinical findings, and expert reviews in the field of visual science and neuro-ophthalmology. The journal’s unique focus is the link between two well-known visual centres, the eye and the brain, with an emphasis on the importance of such connections. All aspects of clinical and especially basic research on the visual system are addressed within the journal as well as significant future directions in vision research and therapeutic measures. This unique journal focuses on neurological aspects of vision – both physiological and pathological. The scope of the journal spans from the cornea to the associational visual cortex and all the visual centers in between. Topics range from basic biological mechanisms to therapeutic treatment, from simple organisms to humans, and utilizing techniques from molecular biology to behavior. The journal especially welcomes primary research articles or review papers that make the connection between the eye and the brain. Specific areas covered in the journal include: Physiology and pathophysiology of visual centers, Eye movement disorders and strabismus, Cellular, biochemical, and molecular features of the visual system, Structural and functional organization of the eye and of the visual cortex, Metabolic demands of the visual system, Diseases and disorders with neuro-ophthalmic manifestations, Clinical and experimental neuro-ophthalmology and visual system pathologies, Epidemiological studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信