Non-Nutritive Suck and Parent Report of Feeding Skills in Infants Born With Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Alaina Martens, Carolyn R Rogers-Vizena, Emily Zimmerman
{"title":"Non-Nutritive Suck and Parent Report of Feeding Skills in Infants Born With Cleft Lip and/or Palate.","authors":"Alaina Martens, Carolyn R Rogers-Vizena, Emily Zimmerman","doi":"10.1177/10556656241299915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare non-nutritive sucking (NNS) and caregiver-reported feeding skills in infants with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) to a control group of typically developing infants without CL/P. To examine differences in NNS patterns and feeding behavior between cleft phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, cross-sectional study comparing infants born with CL/P to an age-matched control group with no congenital anomalies.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urban, academic, tertiary care children's hospital and academic department of speech-language pathology.</p><p><strong>Patients, participants: </strong>Forty-two infants (21 with CL/P; 21 without CL/P), 6 months of age and younger were included. Infants with syndromes or who underwent cleft repair were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>A 5min NNS sample was collected from the infant sucking on the lab's custom research pacifier. The infant's caregiver completed the Neonatal Eating Assessment Tool (NeoEAT) bottle-feeding section about their infant's feeding behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infants with CL/P demonstrated slower NNS frequency (<i>P </i>= .04) and reduced suck amplitude (<i>P </i>= .04) compared to the control group. Caregivers of infants with CL/P reported a higher incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms (<i>P </i>= .04) and overall feeding difficulties (<i>P </i>= .03) relative to the control group. There were no significant differences between CL/P phenotypes for NNS or caregiver reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Infants with CL/P demonstrate differences in NNS physiology and caregiver report measures of feeding compared to age-matched controls. These findings support the need for interventions to optimize sucking and feeding skill development in infants with CL/P.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656241299915"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241299915","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare non-nutritive sucking (NNS) and caregiver-reported feeding skills in infants with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) to a control group of typically developing infants without CL/P. To examine differences in NNS patterns and feeding behavior between cleft phenotypes.

Design: Prospective, cross-sectional study comparing infants born with CL/P to an age-matched control group with no congenital anomalies.

Setting: Urban, academic, tertiary care children's hospital and academic department of speech-language pathology.

Patients, participants: Forty-two infants (21 with CL/P; 21 without CL/P), 6 months of age and younger were included. Infants with syndromes or who underwent cleft repair were excluded.

Main outcome measures: A 5min NNS sample was collected from the infant sucking on the lab's custom research pacifier. The infant's caregiver completed the Neonatal Eating Assessment Tool (NeoEAT) bottle-feeding section about their infant's feeding behaviors.

Results: Infants with CL/P demonstrated slower NNS frequency (P = .04) and reduced suck amplitude (P = .04) compared to the control group. Caregivers of infants with CL/P reported a higher incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms (P = .04) and overall feeding difficulties (P = .03) relative to the control group. There were no significant differences between CL/P phenotypes for NNS or caregiver reported outcomes.

Conclusions: Infants with CL/P demonstrate differences in NNS physiology and caregiver report measures of feeding compared to age-matched controls. These findings support the need for interventions to optimize sucking and feeding skill development in infants with CL/P.

先天性唇裂和/或腭裂婴儿的非营养性吸吮和家长对喂养技能的报告。
目的将唇裂和/或腭裂婴儿(CL/P)的非营养性吸吮(NNS)和护理人员报告的喂养技能与发育正常的非唇裂和/或腭裂婴儿对照组进行比较。研究唇裂表型之间 NNS 模式和喂养行为的差异:设计:前瞻性横断面研究,比较唇裂/腭裂婴儿与无先天性畸形的年龄匹配对照组:患者、参与者:42 名婴儿(其中 21 名为先天性畸形):共纳入 42 名 6 个月及以下的婴儿(21 名患有 CL/P;21 名不患有 CL/P)。不包括患有综合症或进行过裂隙修复的婴儿:从婴儿吸吮实验室定制的研究奶嘴时采集 5 分钟的 NNS 样本。婴儿的看护人填写新生儿进食评估工具(NeoEAT)中有关婴儿进食行为的奶瓶喂养部分:结果:与对照组相比,CL/P 患儿的 NNS 频率较慢(P = .04),吸吮幅度较小(P = .04)。与对照组相比,CL/P 患儿的照顾者报告的胃肠道症状发生率(P = .04)和总体喂养困难(P = .03)更高。在NNS或护理人员报告的结果方面,CL/P表型之间没有明显差异:结论:与年龄匹配的对照组相比,有 CL/P 表型的婴儿在 NNS 生理和护理人员报告的喂养措施方面存在差异。这些研究结果表明,有必要对 CL/P 婴儿进行干预,以优化其吸吮和喂养技能的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信