Integrating weightbearing CT findings into evaluation of conventional radiographs in progressive collapsing foot deformity.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Doria Juric, Ricardo Donners, Dorothee Harder, Arne Burssens, Corina Nüesch, Nicola Krähenbühl
{"title":"Integrating weightbearing CT findings into evaluation of conventional radiographs in progressive collapsing foot deformity.","authors":"Doria Juric, Ricardo Donners, Dorothee Harder, Arne Burssens, Corina Nüesch, Nicola Krähenbühl","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) remains challenging to treat. Surgical planning depends on the amount and complexity of the deformity, which requires accurate differentiation through precise imaging. Weightbearing CT (WBCT) imaging has enhanced the three-dimensional (3D) assessment of PCFD. However, it remains unclear how PCFD findings on WBCT are related to the evaluation of conventional weightbearing radiographs. Therefore, we aimed to (1) compare specific X-ray measurements to corresponding WBCT measurements; (2) evaluate the reliability of X-ray measurements of interest; and (3) investigate whether X-ray measurements can infer osseous impingement in the subtalar joint region identified through WBCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two clinically established measurements were assessed on standardized weightbearing radiographs (manually) as well as on the WBCT datasets (auto-generated): (1) talo-calcaneal overlap (TCO, mm) and (2) talo-navicular coverage (TNC, °). In addition to the measurements, osseous impingement in the subtalar joint region was assessed on WBCT using three criteria, compared both inter- and intra-rater: (1) joint obliteration; (2) cyst formation; and (3) signs of secondary instability. Two of the criteria needed to be fulfilled to confirm subtalar impingement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While no significant difference between X-ray and WBCT measurements was evident for TCO, significant differences were found for TNC. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was with an intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9 excellent for both measurements on X-rays. The mean bias of measurement (between X-ray and WBCT) was 0.2 mm for TCO and -22 degrees for TNC. Cohen's Kappa for inter- and intra-rater reliability to assess patients for subtalar instability was > 0.9. The probability to infer subtalar impingement was ≥ 0.85 if TCO was > 15 mm or TNC was > 25 degrees on X-ray.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The examined imaging parameters are reliably assessable through conventional radiographs (TCO/TNC) or WBCT (osseous subtalar impingement). In situations where WBCT is unavailable, X-ray-assessed TCO and TNC can serve as predictors for osseous sinus tarsi impingement. This finding plays a pivotal role in evaluating PCFD patients, aiding in the surgical decision-making process between joint-preserving interventions (e.g., osteotomies) and joint-sacrificing procedures (e.g., realignment fusion).</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, observational study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.11.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) remains challenging to treat. Surgical planning depends on the amount and complexity of the deformity, which requires accurate differentiation through precise imaging. Weightbearing CT (WBCT) imaging has enhanced the three-dimensional (3D) assessment of PCFD. However, it remains unclear how PCFD findings on WBCT are related to the evaluation of conventional weightbearing radiographs. Therefore, we aimed to (1) compare specific X-ray measurements to corresponding WBCT measurements; (2) evaluate the reliability of X-ray measurements of interest; and (3) investigate whether X-ray measurements can infer osseous impingement in the subtalar joint region identified through WBCT.

Methods: Two clinically established measurements were assessed on standardized weightbearing radiographs (manually) as well as on the WBCT datasets (auto-generated): (1) talo-calcaneal overlap (TCO, mm) and (2) talo-navicular coverage (TNC, °). In addition to the measurements, osseous impingement in the subtalar joint region was assessed on WBCT using three criteria, compared both inter- and intra-rater: (1) joint obliteration; (2) cyst formation; and (3) signs of secondary instability. Two of the criteria needed to be fulfilled to confirm subtalar impingement.

Results: While no significant difference between X-ray and WBCT measurements was evident for TCO, significant differences were found for TNC. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was with an intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9 excellent for both measurements on X-rays. The mean bias of measurement (between X-ray and WBCT) was 0.2 mm for TCO and -22 degrees for TNC. Cohen's Kappa for inter- and intra-rater reliability to assess patients for subtalar instability was > 0.9. The probability to infer subtalar impingement was ≥ 0.85 if TCO was > 15 mm or TNC was > 25 degrees on X-ray.

Conclusion: The examined imaging parameters are reliably assessable through conventional radiographs (TCO/TNC) or WBCT (osseous subtalar impingement). In situations where WBCT is unavailable, X-ray-assessed TCO and TNC can serve as predictors for osseous sinus tarsi impingement. This finding plays a pivotal role in evaluating PCFD patients, aiding in the surgical decision-making process between joint-preserving interventions (e.g., osteotomies) and joint-sacrificing procedures (e.g., realignment fusion).

Level of evidence: Level IV, observational study.

在评估进行性塌足畸形的传统 X 光片时整合负重 CT 结果。
背景:进行性塌足畸形(PCFD)的治疗仍然具有挑战性。手术计划取决于畸形的数量和复杂程度,这就需要通过精确成像进行准确区分。负重 CT(WBCT)成像增强了对 PCFD 的三维(3D)评估。然而,目前仍不清楚 WBCT 上 PCFD 的发现与传统负重 X 光片的评估有何关联。因此,我们的目的是:(1) 将特定的 X 射线测量结果与相应的 WBCT 测量结果进行比较;(2) 评估相关 X 射线测量结果的可靠性;(3) 研究 X 射线测量结果能否推断出通过 WBCT 确定的距下关节区域的骨性撞击:方法: 在标准化负重X光片(手动)和WBCT数据集(自动生成)上评估了两种临床公认的测量方法:(1)距骨-桡骨重叠(TCO,毫米);(2)距骨-舟骨覆盖(TNC,°)。除测量结果外,WBCT 还采用三项标准评估距下关节区域的骨性撞击情况,并在评分者之间和评分者内部进行比较:(1) 关节阻塞;(2) 囊肿形成;(3) 继发性不稳定迹象。需要满足其中两个标准才能确定为距骨下撞击:虽然X光和WBCT的测量结果在TCO方面没有明显差异,但在TNC方面却有明显差异。X 射线测量和 WBCT 测量的观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性都很好,类内相关系数大于 0.9。TCO 的平均测量偏差(X 光和 WBCT 之间)为 0.2 毫米,TNC 为-22 度。评估患者距骨下不稳的评分者间和评分者内可靠性的科恩卡帕(Cohen's Kappa)大于 0.9。如果X光片上的TCO>15毫米或TNC>25度,则推断出距骨下撞击的概率≥0.85:结论:通过传统X光片(TCO/TNC)或WBCT(骨性踝关节下撞击)可以可靠地评估所检查的成像参数。在没有 WBCT 的情况下,X 射线评估的 TCO 和 TNC 可作为骨性窦股撞击的预测指标。这一发现在评估 PCFD 患者时起着关键作用,有助于在保留关节的干预措施(如截骨术)和牺牲关节的手术(如复位融合术)之间进行手术决策:证据等级:IV级,观察性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信