Evaluation of Post-Operative Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fracture Interventions: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21514593241273326
Erin Sheffels, Mariam Khalil, Kristen Hutchison, Nicole J Hardy, Ranita Tarchand, John M Pederson, Anjani Parikh, Michael Blauth
{"title":"Evaluation of Post-Operative Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fracture Interventions: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Erin Sheffels, Mariam Khalil, Kristen Hutchison, Nicole J Hardy, Ranita Tarchand, John M Pederson, Anjani Parikh, Michael Blauth","doi":"10.1177/21514593241273326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Femoral neck fractures (FNF) represent a significant challenge in orthopedic practice, demanding prompt intervention to restore function and mobility in affected individuals. Numerous surgical interventions have been developed to address these fractures, including internal fixation with devices such as the Femoral Neck System (FNS, DePuy Synthes, Inc., West Chester, PA, USA). However, the optimal fixation system remains unclear. Understanding the postoperative outcomes associated with these interventions is crucial for optimizing patient care and informing treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review evaluates the efficacy and safety of the Femoral Neck System relative to other operative treatment options. Clinical and safety outcomes included mortality, perioperative complications, postoperative complications at 1 year, and reoperation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 studies with 68,567 patients with FNF treated with internal fixation were identified. Of these, thirteen included FNS as a treatment arm (1078 patients). Due to heterogeneity in study designs and populations, only the eleven studies that directly compared FNS to other operative treatments, and 2 non-comparative studies that treated with FNS were included in the systematic review. Seven of the eleven included studies had high risk of bias, 2 had moderate risk of bias, and 2 had low risk of bias. FNS groups had similar or significantly lower incidences of postoperative complications, reoperations, and mortality compared to cannulated screw, cancellous screw, or dynamic or sliding hip screw groups in all studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNS can be a safe and effective operative treatment option for FNF. Safety outcomes and reoperation rates are comparable between patients treated with FNS and patients treated with cannulated screws, cancellous screws, and dynamic or sliding hips screws. Future prospective, controlled studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of FNS relative to other operative treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"15 ","pages":"21514593241273326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593241273326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) represent a significant challenge in orthopedic practice, demanding prompt intervention to restore function and mobility in affected individuals. Numerous surgical interventions have been developed to address these fractures, including internal fixation with devices such as the Femoral Neck System (FNS, DePuy Synthes, Inc., West Chester, PA, USA). However, the optimal fixation system remains unclear. Understanding the postoperative outcomes associated with these interventions is crucial for optimizing patient care and informing treatment decisions.

Significance: This PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review evaluates the efficacy and safety of the Femoral Neck System relative to other operative treatment options. Clinical and safety outcomes included mortality, perioperative complications, postoperative complications at 1 year, and reoperation.

Results: A total of 117 studies with 68,567 patients with FNF treated with internal fixation were identified. Of these, thirteen included FNS as a treatment arm (1078 patients). Due to heterogeneity in study designs and populations, only the eleven studies that directly compared FNS to other operative treatments, and 2 non-comparative studies that treated with FNS were included in the systematic review. Seven of the eleven included studies had high risk of bias, 2 had moderate risk of bias, and 2 had low risk of bias. FNS groups had similar or significantly lower incidences of postoperative complications, reoperations, and mortality compared to cannulated screw, cancellous screw, or dynamic or sliding hip screw groups in all studies.

Conclusion: FNS can be a safe and effective operative treatment option for FNF. Safety outcomes and reoperation rates are comparable between patients treated with FNS and patients treated with cannulated screws, cancellous screws, and dynamic or sliding hips screws. Future prospective, controlled studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of FNS relative to other operative treatment options.

股骨颈骨折干预术后效果评估:系统回顾
简介:股骨颈骨折(FNF)是骨科治疗中的一大难题,需要及时干预以恢复患者的功能和活动能力。目前已开发出许多手术干预措施来治疗这类骨折,包括使用股骨颈系统(FNS,DePuy Synthes, Inc.)然而,最佳的固定系统仍不明确。了解与这些干预措施相关的术后结果对于优化患者护理和为治疗决策提供依据至关重要:这篇符合 PRISMA 标准的系统性文献综述评估了股骨颈系统相对于其他手术治疗方案的有效性和安全性。临床和安全性结果包括死亡率、围手术期并发症、术后1年并发症以及再次手术:结果:共发现了117项研究,68567名股骨颈骨折患者接受了内固定治疗。其中,13 项研究将 FNS 作为治疗手段(1078 名患者)。由于研究设计和研究人群的异质性,只有11项直接比较FNS和其他手术治疗的研究,以及2项使用FNS治疗的非比较性研究被纳入系统综述。在纳入的 11 项研究中,7 项存在高偏倚风险,2 项存在中度偏倚风险,2 项存在低偏倚风险。在所有研究中,FNS组与套管螺钉组、松质骨螺钉组、动态或滑动髋关节螺钉组相比,术后并发症、再次手术和死亡率的发生率相似或明显较低:结论:FNS是一种安全有效的FNF手术治疗方案。结论:FNS 是治疗 FNF 的一种安全有效的手术方案,采用 FNS 治疗的患者与采用套管螺钉、松质骨螺钉、动态或滑动髋关节螺钉治疗的患者在安全性和再手术率方面具有可比性。未来需要进行前瞻性对照研究,以确认 FNS 相对于其他手术治疗方案的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信