Associations of physical activity and sedentary time with health-related quality of life in patients with localized renal cell cancer: a cross-sectional analysis within the ReLife study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alina Vrieling, Jake S F Maurits, Job Gerritsen, Laurien M Buffart, Katja K H Aben, J P Michiel Sedelaar, Esmée A Bakker, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney
{"title":"Associations of physical activity and sedentary time with health-related quality of life in patients with localized renal cell cancer: a cross-sectional analysis within the ReLife study.","authors":"Alina Vrieling, Jake S F Maurits, Job Gerritsen, Laurien M Buffart, Katja K H Aben, J P Michiel Sedelaar, Esmée A Bakker, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08969-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the associations of device-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time as well as self-reported MVPA with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with localized renal cell cancer (RCC) in the recovery phase after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At 3 months post-surgery, 341 patients with stage I-III RCC participating in the ReLife study wore an ActivPAL3 device to determine MVPA and sedentary time. The SQUASH questionnaire was used for assessing self-reported MVPA, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 for assessing HRQoL (range 0-100). Multivariable linear regression models were used to examine the cross-sectional associations of MVPA and sedentary time with HRQoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest (≥ 6.7 h/week) versus lowest (≤ 2.7 h/week) quartile of MVPA was associated with a better global health status (β, 10.2; 95% CI, 5.1, 15.3), summary score (β, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.1, 8.1), physical (β, 7.7; 95% CI, 3.8, 11.6), role (β, 12.4; 95% CI, 4.7, 20.2), and social functioning (β, 7.3; 95% CI, 0.2, 14.4), and lower fatigue (β, - 11.2; 95% CI, - 18.1, - 4.2). Results for self-reported MVPA were in the same direction but weaker. The lowest (≤ 8.8 h/day) versus highest (≥ 11.5 h/day) quartile of sedentary time was associated with better physical functioning (β, 4.6; 95% CI, 0.8, 8.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with localized RCC, higher MVPA 3 months post-surgery was associated with better HRQoL outcomes including less fatigue whereas lower sedentary time was only associated with better physical functioning. This information can contribute to the development of physical activity guidelines and interventions to improve HRQoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"800"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08969-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the associations of device-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time as well as self-reported MVPA with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with localized renal cell cancer (RCC) in the recovery phase after surgery.

Methods: At 3 months post-surgery, 341 patients with stage I-III RCC participating in the ReLife study wore an ActivPAL3 device to determine MVPA and sedentary time. The SQUASH questionnaire was used for assessing self-reported MVPA, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 for assessing HRQoL (range 0-100). Multivariable linear regression models were used to examine the cross-sectional associations of MVPA and sedentary time with HRQoL.

Results: The highest (≥ 6.7 h/week) versus lowest (≤ 2.7 h/week) quartile of MVPA was associated with a better global health status (β, 10.2; 95% CI, 5.1, 15.3), summary score (β, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.1, 8.1), physical (β, 7.7; 95% CI, 3.8, 11.6), role (β, 12.4; 95% CI, 4.7, 20.2), and social functioning (β, 7.3; 95% CI, 0.2, 14.4), and lower fatigue (β, - 11.2; 95% CI, - 18.1, - 4.2). Results for self-reported MVPA were in the same direction but weaker. The lowest (≤ 8.8 h/day) versus highest (≥ 11.5 h/day) quartile of sedentary time was associated with better physical functioning (β, 4.6; 95% CI, 0.8, 8.5).

Conclusions: In patients with localized RCC, higher MVPA 3 months post-surgery was associated with better HRQoL outcomes including less fatigue whereas lower sedentary time was only associated with better physical functioning. This information can contribute to the development of physical activity guidelines and interventions to improve HRQoL.

局部肾细胞癌患者的体力活动和久坐时间与健康相关生活质量的关系:ReLife 研究中的横断面分析。
目的:本研究探讨了局部肾细胞癌(RCC)患者术后恢复阶段通过设备测量的中度到剧烈运动(MVPA)和久坐时间以及自我报告的 MVPA 与健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)之间的关系:341名参与ReLife研究的I-III期RCC患者在术后3个月佩戴了ActivPAL3设备,以测定MVPA和久坐时间。SQUASH 问卷用于评估自我报告的 MVPA,EORTC QLQ-C30 用于评估 HRQoL(范围 0-100)。采用多变量线性回归模型研究了MVPA和久坐时间与HRQoL的横截面关系:结果:最高(≥ 6.7 小时/周)与最低(≤ 2.7 小时/周)四分位数的 MVPA 与更好的总体健康状况(β,10.2;95% CI,5.1,15.3)、总分(β,4.6;95% CI,1.1,8.1)、体力(β,10.2;95% CI,5.1,15.3)和健康生活质量(HRQoL)相关。1)、体能(β,7.7;95% CI,3.8,11.6)、角色(β,12.4;95% CI,4.7,20.2)和社会功能(β,7.3;95% CI,0.2,14.4),以及较低的疲劳度(β,- 11.2;95% CI,- 18.1,- 4.2)。自我报告的 MVPA 结果方向相同,但较弱。久坐时间最低(≤ 8.8 小时/天)与最高(≥ 11.5 小时/天)的四分位数与更好的身体功能相关(β,4.6;95% CI,0.8,8.5):在局部RCC患者中,术后3个月MVPA越高,其HRQoL结果越好,包括疲劳越少,而久坐时间越短,其身体功能越好。这些信息有助于制定体育锻炼指南和干预措施,以改善患者的 HRQoL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信