Active Probing of a RuO2/CZ Catalyst Surface as a Tool for Bridging the Gap Between CO Oxidation Catalytic Tests in a Model and Realistic Exhaust Gas Stream.
Ewa M Iwanek Nee Wilczkowska, Leonarda Francesca Liotta, Giuseppe Pantaleo, Linje Hu, Shazam Williams, Donald W Kirk, Zbigniew Kaszkur
{"title":"Active Probing of a RuO<sub>2</sub>/CZ Catalyst Surface as a Tool for Bridging the Gap Between CO Oxidation Catalytic Tests in a Model and Realistic Exhaust Gas Stream.","authors":"Ewa M Iwanek Nee Wilczkowska, Leonarda Francesca Liotta, Giuseppe Pantaleo, Linje Hu, Shazam Williams, Donald W Kirk, Zbigniew Kaszkur","doi":"10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Herein, we present a paper that attempts to bridge the gap between CO oxidation catalytic tests performed in a model stream and a more realistic exhaust gas stream by incorporating characterization methods that allow for active probing of the catalyst surface. The results have shown that it is not just the abundance of a given type of species on the surface that impacts the activity of a system but also the ease of extraction of ions from their surface (time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry) and the response of the support to change in the feed composition (dynamic in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) with variable atmosphere). The study utilizes the method of doping a catalyst (RuO<sub>2</sub>/CZ) with a small amount of alkali-metal (K<sup>+</sup> or Na<sup>+</sup>) carbonates in order to slightly modify its surface to gain insight into parameters that may cause discrepancies between model stream activity and complex stream activity. The most pronounced difference is that in the model stream, which contains only CO and O<sub>2</sub> in helium, both alkali ions improve the activity of the system at temperatures around 175 °C, whereas in the complex stream, which mimics the exhaust stream from a diesel engine under oxygen lean conditions, the K<sup>+</sup>-doped catalyst is slightly worse than RuO<sub>2</sub> /CZ and RuO<sub>2</sub> + Na<sup>+</sup>/CZ and much worse in propane combustion. The total hydrogen consumption values (temperature-programmed reduction) and the O<sub>ads</sub>/O<sub>latt</sub> ratios (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) both place the RuO<sub>2</sub> + K<sup>+</sup>/CZ system between the other two and hence provided no reason for the unusual behavior of the K<sup>+</sup>-doped catalyst. In contrast, both in situ XRD measurement tests and ToF SIMS results show a pronounced difference between the RuO<sub>2</sub> + K<sup>+</sup>/CZ catalyst and the other two systems, which indicates that the interaction of the surfaces with the reagents might be the cause of the discrepancy. The CO<sub>2</sub>-TPD results show that this system retains more CO<sub>2</sub>, i.e., the product, at adsorption sites, which might reduce the adsorption of other reagents, i.e., oxygen ions, CO, and propane, hence lowering the overall activity of the system.</p>","PeriodicalId":29798,"journal":{"name":"ACS Materials Au","volume":"4 6","pages":"643-653"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Materials Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Herein, we present a paper that attempts to bridge the gap between CO oxidation catalytic tests performed in a model stream and a more realistic exhaust gas stream by incorporating characterization methods that allow for active probing of the catalyst surface. The results have shown that it is not just the abundance of a given type of species on the surface that impacts the activity of a system but also the ease of extraction of ions from their surface (time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry) and the response of the support to change in the feed composition (dynamic in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) with variable atmosphere). The study utilizes the method of doping a catalyst (RuO2/CZ) with a small amount of alkali-metal (K+ or Na+) carbonates in order to slightly modify its surface to gain insight into parameters that may cause discrepancies between model stream activity and complex stream activity. The most pronounced difference is that in the model stream, which contains only CO and O2 in helium, both alkali ions improve the activity of the system at temperatures around 175 °C, whereas in the complex stream, which mimics the exhaust stream from a diesel engine under oxygen lean conditions, the K+-doped catalyst is slightly worse than RuO2 /CZ and RuO2 + Na+/CZ and much worse in propane combustion. The total hydrogen consumption values (temperature-programmed reduction) and the Oads/Olatt ratios (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) both place the RuO2 + K+/CZ system between the other two and hence provided no reason for the unusual behavior of the K+-doped catalyst. In contrast, both in situ XRD measurement tests and ToF SIMS results show a pronounced difference between the RuO2 + K+/CZ catalyst and the other two systems, which indicates that the interaction of the surfaces with the reagents might be the cause of the discrepancy. The CO2-TPD results show that this system retains more CO2, i.e., the product, at adsorption sites, which might reduce the adsorption of other reagents, i.e., oxygen ions, CO, and propane, hence lowering the overall activity of the system.
期刊介绍:
ACS Materials Au is an open access journal publishing letters articles reviews and perspectives describing high-quality research at the forefront of fundamental and applied research and at the interface between materials and other disciplines such as chemistry engineering and biology. Papers that showcase multidisciplinary and innovative materials research addressing global challenges are especially welcome. Areas of interest include but are not limited to:Design synthesis characterization and evaluation of forefront and emerging materialsUnderstanding structure property performance relationships and their underlying mechanismsDevelopment of materials for energy environmental biomedical electronic and catalytic applications