Characterizing Physiologic Swallowing Impairment Profiles: A Large-Scale Exploratory Study of Head and Neck Cancer, Stroke, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, and Parkinson's Disease.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Alex E Clain, Noelle Samia, Kate Davidson, Bonnie Martin-Harris
{"title":"Characterizing Physiologic Swallowing Impairment Profiles: A Large-Scale Exploratory Study of Head and Neck Cancer, Stroke, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, and Parkinson's Disease.","authors":"Alex E Clain, Noelle Samia, Kate Davidson, Bonnie Martin-Harris","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to use a large swallowing database to explore and compare the swallow-physiology impairment profiles of five dysphagia-associated diagnoses: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, head and neck cancer (HNC), Parkinson's disease (PD), and stroke.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 8,190 patients across five diagnoses were extracted from a de-identified swallowing database, that is, the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile Swallowing Data Registry, for the present exploratory cross-sectional analysis. To identify the impairment profiles of the five diagnoses, we fit 18 partial proportional odds models, one for each of the 17 Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile components and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale, with impairment score as the dependent variable and diagnoses, age, sex, and race as the independent variables with interactions between age and diagnoses and between PD and dementia (in effect creating a PD with dementia [PDwDem] group). For components with > 5% missingness, we applied inverse probability weighting to correct for bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PD and COPD did not significantly differ on 13 of the 18 outcome variables (all <i>p</i>s > .02). Dementia, stroke, and PDwDem all showed worse impairments than COPD or PD on five of six oral components (all <i>p</i>s < .007). HNC had worse impairment than all diagnoses except PDwDem for nine of 10 pharyngeal components (all <i>p</i>s < .006). Stroke and HNC had worse penetration/aspiration than all other diagnoses (all <i>p</i>s < .003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present results show that there are both common and differing impairment profiles among these five diagnoses. These commonalities and differences in profiles provide a basis for the generation of hypotheses about the nature and severity of dysphagia in these populations. These results are also likely highly generalizable given the size and representativeness of the data set.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27478245.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to use a large swallowing database to explore and compare the swallow-physiology impairment profiles of five dysphagia-associated diagnoses: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, head and neck cancer (HNC), Parkinson's disease (PD), and stroke.

Method: A total of 8,190 patients across five diagnoses were extracted from a de-identified swallowing database, that is, the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile Swallowing Data Registry, for the present exploratory cross-sectional analysis. To identify the impairment profiles of the five diagnoses, we fit 18 partial proportional odds models, one for each of the 17 Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile components and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale, with impairment score as the dependent variable and diagnoses, age, sex, and race as the independent variables with interactions between age and diagnoses and between PD and dementia (in effect creating a PD with dementia [PDwDem] group). For components with > 5% missingness, we applied inverse probability weighting to correct for bias.

Results: PD and COPD did not significantly differ on 13 of the 18 outcome variables (all ps > .02). Dementia, stroke, and PDwDem all showed worse impairments than COPD or PD on five of six oral components (all ps < .007). HNC had worse impairment than all diagnoses except PDwDem for nine of 10 pharyngeal components (all ps < .006). Stroke and HNC had worse penetration/aspiration than all other diagnoses (all ps < .003).

Conclusions: The present results show that there are both common and differing impairment profiles among these five diagnoses. These commonalities and differences in profiles provide a basis for the generation of hypotheses about the nature and severity of dysphagia in these populations. These results are also likely highly generalizable given the size and representativeness of the data set.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27478245.

生理性吞咽障碍特征描述:一项针对头颈癌、中风、慢性阻塞性肺病、痴呆症和帕金森病的大规模探索性研究。
目的:本研究的目的是利用大型吞咽数据库探索和比较五种吞咽困难相关诊断的吞咽生理学损伤特征:慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)、痴呆、头颈部癌症(HNC)、帕金森病(PD)和中风:本探索性横断面分析从去标识化吞咽数据库(即改良吞咽钡损伤特征吞咽数据登记处)中提取了五种诊断的 8190 名患者。为了确定五种诊断的损伤概况,我们拟合了 18 个偏比例几率模型,17 个 "改良型吞咽钡损伤概况 "成分和 "穿刺-吞咽量表 "各一个,损伤评分为因变量,诊断、年龄、性别和种族为自变量,年龄与诊断之间以及与帕金森病和痴呆之间存在交互作用(实际上创建了一个帕金森病伴痴呆[PDwDem]组)。对于缺失率>5%的成分,我们采用了反概率加权法来纠正偏差:在 18 个结果变量中,有 13 个结果变量与慢性阻塞性肺病无显著差异(所有 ps 均大于 0.02)。痴呆症、中风和慢性阻塞性肺病患者在六项口腔成分中的五项上都比慢性阻塞性肺病或慢性阻塞性肺病患者的损伤更严重(所有 ps 均小于 .007)。在 10 个咽部检查项目中,HNC 比除 PDwDem 以外的所有诊断项目中的 9 个都更严重(所有 ps 均小于 .006)。中风和 HNC 的穿透力/吸入力比所有其他诊断更差(所有 ps < .003):本研究结果表明,这五种诊断既有共同的损伤特征,也有不同的损伤特征。这些共同点和不同点为提出有关这些人群吞咽困难的性质和严重程度的假设提供了依据。鉴于数据集的规模和代表性,这些结果也可能具有很强的普遍性。补充材料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27478245。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信