Impact of Prior Cesarean Delivery on Pregnancy Outcomes and Hemorrhage Risks in Complete Placenta Previa: A Decade-Long Retrospective Analysis.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Xuemin Wei, Weiwei Cheng
{"title":"Impact of Prior Cesarean Delivery on Pregnancy Outcomes and Hemorrhage Risks in Complete Placenta Previa: A Decade-Long Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Xuemin Wei, Weiwei Cheng","doi":"10.12659/MSM.944432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Complete placenta previa (CPP) is a life-threatening condition with increasing incidence worldwide. This retrospective study investigated the impact of prior cesarean delivery on pregnancy outcomes in women with CPP. MATERIAL AND METHODS The data of 476 patients with CPP who underwent cesarean delivery in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China, from January 2013 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into prior cesarean delivery and no-prior cesarean delivery groups. Diagnosis of CPP was confirmed by last preoperative ultrasound/MRI. Maternal characteristics, intrapartum conditions, maternal complications, and neonatal outcomes were compared between groups. Independent predictors of hemorrhage were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The prior cesarean delivery group had significantly higher maternal age (36 [3.7)] vs 34.2 [4.2)], P=0.012), rates of intraoperative bleeding (982.9 [202.9] vs 588.8 [134.2], P=0.001), hysterectomy (6.4% vs 0.9%, P=0.002), premature birth (60.9% vs 36.6%, P<0.001), and neonatal hospitalization (13.5% vs 6.3%, P=0.008). The no-prior cesarean delivery group had higher rates of assisted reproduction (30.0% vs 3.8%, P<0.001) and endometriosis history (14.1% vs 8.3%, P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed a history of cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.67), 2 or more previous cesarean deliveries (aOR 5.22), anterior placenta (aOR 2.53), abnormal percreta (aOR 5.24), and antepartum bleeding (aOR 1.90) were strongly associated with massive hemorrhage (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Prior cesarean delivery increases risks of hemorrhage, hysterectomy, premature birth, and neonatal hospitalization in patients with CPP. Independent risk factors for hemorrhage in these patients include prior cesarean delivery (especially 2 or more), anterior placenta, abnormal placentation, and prenatal bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e944432"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.944432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Complete placenta previa (CPP) is a life-threatening condition with increasing incidence worldwide. This retrospective study investigated the impact of prior cesarean delivery on pregnancy outcomes in women with CPP. MATERIAL AND METHODS The data of 476 patients with CPP who underwent cesarean delivery in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China, from January 2013 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into prior cesarean delivery and no-prior cesarean delivery groups. Diagnosis of CPP was confirmed by last preoperative ultrasound/MRI. Maternal characteristics, intrapartum conditions, maternal complications, and neonatal outcomes were compared between groups. Independent predictors of hemorrhage were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The prior cesarean delivery group had significantly higher maternal age (36 [3.7)] vs 34.2 [4.2)], P=0.012), rates of intraoperative bleeding (982.9 [202.9] vs 588.8 [134.2], P=0.001), hysterectomy (6.4% vs 0.9%, P=0.002), premature birth (60.9% vs 36.6%, P<0.001), and neonatal hospitalization (13.5% vs 6.3%, P=0.008). The no-prior cesarean delivery group had higher rates of assisted reproduction (30.0% vs 3.8%, P<0.001) and endometriosis history (14.1% vs 8.3%, P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed a history of cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.67), 2 or more previous cesarean deliveries (aOR 5.22), anterior placenta (aOR 2.53), abnormal percreta (aOR 5.24), and antepartum bleeding (aOR 1.90) were strongly associated with massive hemorrhage (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Prior cesarean delivery increases risks of hemorrhage, hysterectomy, premature birth, and neonatal hospitalization in patients with CPP. Independent risk factors for hemorrhage in these patients include prior cesarean delivery (especially 2 or more), anterior placenta, abnormal placentation, and prenatal bleeding.

剖宫产对完全性前置胎盘妊娠结局和出血风险的影响:长达十年的回顾性分析。
背景完全性前置胎盘(CPP)是一种危及生命的疾病,在全球的发病率越来越高。这项回顾性研究探讨了剖宫产对 CPP 患者妊娠结局的影响。材料与方法 回顾性分析了 2013 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在中国上海一家三级甲等医院接受剖宫产的 476 例 CPP 患者的数据。患者分为曾行剖宫产组和未行剖宫产组。术前最后一次超声/MRI检查确诊为CPP。比较了两组产妇的特征、产时情况、产妇并发症和新生儿结局。通过逻辑回归分析了出血的独立预测因素。结果 既往剖宫产组的产妇年龄(36 [3.7)] vs 34.2 [4.2)],P=0.012)、术中出血率(982.9 [202.9] vs 588.8 [134.2],P=0.001)、子宫切除率(6.4% vs 0.9%,P=0.002)、早产率(60.9% vs 36.6%,P=0.001)、产后并发症和新生儿预后均显著高于剖宫产组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信