[EVALUATION OF THE BASIC PERFORMANCE IN THE SPECIFIC IGE ANTIBODY TEST KITS, VIEW ALLERGY 39 AND SILIS ALLERGY 45+1].

Q4 Medicine

Japanese Journal of Allergology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.15036/arerugi.73.1150

Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada, Kenji Toyokuni, Miori Sato, Sayaka Hamaguchi, Fumi Ishikawa, Mayako Saito-Abe, Yasuaki Matsumoto, Hisako Ogasawara, Daichi Suzuki, Kotaro Umezawa, Hideaki Morita, Tatsuki Fukuie, Misao Oda, Shintaro Suzuki, Ken Fukuda, Takeshi Nakahara, Shigeharu Fujieda, Yukihiro Ohya

{"title":"[EVALUATION OF THE BASIC PERFORMANCE IN THE SPECIFIC IGE ANTIBODY TEST KITS, VIEW ALLERGY 39 AND SILIS ALLERGY 45+1].","authors":"Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada, Kenji Toyokuni, Miori Sato, Sayaka Hamaguchi, Fumi Ishikawa, Mayako Saito-Abe, Yasuaki Matsumoto, Hisako Ogasawara, Daichi Suzuki, Kotaro Umezawa, Hideaki Morita, Tatsuki Fukuie, Misao Oda, Shintaro Suzuki, Ken Fukuda, Takeshi Nakahara, Shigeharu Fujieda, Yukihiro Ohya","doi":"10.15036/arerugi.73.1150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the basic performance and accuracy as a screening test by comparing SiLIS Allergy 45+1 with View Allergy 39.Methods: Measurements were performed with reagents and measuring instruments for View Allergy 39 and SiLIS Allergy 45+1 using blood samples of individuals with a previous history of IgE sensitizations. We compared the results between SiLIS Allergy 45+1 with View Allergy 39.Results: The agreement rates for positive, negative, judgment, and class of inhalant allergens were 88.7%, 95.1%, 90.8%, and 93.8%, respectively. The correlation rates for food allergens were 90.9%, 69.9%, 78.2%, and 89.2%, respectively. In triplicate measurements, the class agreement rate for SiLIS Allergy 45+1 was 94.2%. In correlation tests with previously approved drugs (FEIA method), the positive agreement rate for specific IgE was 94.9%, negative agreement rate was 95.0%, judgment agreement rate was 95.0%, and the class agreement rate for nonspecific IgE correlation tests was 100.0%, showing good results.Conclusion: Multi-item screening tests with SiLIS Allergy 45+1 showed high correlation with existing products such as View Allergy 39, suggesting high accuracy as a measurement method.","PeriodicalId":35521,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Allergology","volume":"73 9","pages":"1150-1157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Allergology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15036/arerugi.73.1150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the basic performance and accuracy as a screening test by comparing SiLIS Allergy 45+1 with View Allergy 39.

Methods: Measurements were performed with reagents and measuring instruments for View Allergy 39 and SiLIS Allergy 45+1 using blood samples of individuals with a previous history of IgE sensitizations. We compared the results between SiLIS Allergy 45+1 with View Allergy 39.

Results: The agreement rates for positive, negative, judgment, and class of inhalant allergens were 88.7%, 95.1%, 90.8%, and 93.8%, respectively. The correlation rates for food allergens were 90.9%, 69.9%, 78.2%, and 89.2%, respectively. In triplicate measurements, the class agreement rate for SiLIS Allergy 45+1 was 94.2%. In correlation tests with previously approved drugs (FEIA method), the positive agreement rate for specific IgE was 94.9%, negative agreement rate was 95.0%, judgment agreement rate was 95.0%, and the class agreement rate for nonspecific IgE correlation tests was 100.0%, showing good results.

Conclusion: Multi-item screening tests with SiLIS Allergy 45+1 showed high correlation with existing products such as View Allergy 39, suggesting high accuracy as a measurement method.

查看原文本刊更多论文

[特异性 ig 抗体检测试剂盒、view 过敏 39 和 silis 过敏 45+1 的基本性能评估]。

背景和目的：本研究旨在通过比较 SiLIS Allergy 45+1 和 View Allergy 39，评估其作为筛查试验的基本性能和准确性：方法：使用 View Allergy 39 和 SiLIS Allergy 45+1 的试剂和测量仪器，对曾有 IgE 过敏史的人的血样进行测量。我们比较了 SiLIS Allergy 45+1 和 View Allergy 39 的结果：结果：吸入剂过敏原的阳性、阴性、判断和类别的一致率分别为 88.7%、95.1%、90.8% 和 93.8%。食物过敏原的相关率分别为 90.9%、69.9%、78.2% 和 89.2%。在一式三份的测量中，SiLIS Allergy 45+1 的等级一致率为 94.2%。在与以前批准的药物（FEIA 方法）的相关测试中，特异性 IgE 的阳性一致率为 94.9%，阴性一致率为 95.0%，判断一致率为 95.0%，非特异性 IgE 相关测试的等级一致率为 100.0%，显示出良好的结果：SiLIS过敏45+1的多项目筛查测试与现有产品（如View Allergy 39）具有很高的相关性，表明其作为一种测量方法具有很高的准确性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Japanese Journal of Allergology Medicine-Immunology and Allergy

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Japanese Society of Allergology is made up of medical researchers and clinical physicians who share an involvement in the study of allergies and clinical immunology. Clinical subspecialties include such allergies and immune-response disorders as bronchial asthma, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, collagen disease, allergic rhinitis, pollenosis, hives, atopic dermatitis, and immunodeficiency. However, there are many patients afflicted by other allergies as well. The Society considers all such patients and disorders within its purview.