The dose-response of the Copenhagen adduction exercise on adductor strength in high-level youth hockey players: A three-arm randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Marcos Quintana-Cepedal, Omar de la Calle, María Medina-Sánchez, Irene Crespo, Hugo Olmedillas
{"title":"The dose-response of the Copenhagen adduction exercise on adductor strength in high-level youth hockey players: A three-arm randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Marcos Quintana-Cepedal, Omar de la Calle, María Medina-Sánchez, Irene Crespo, Hugo Olmedillas","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2024.2430875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this cluster-randomised controlled trial was to investigate the training and detraining effects of two different-volume Copenhagen Adduction Exercise (CAE) protocols on adductor squeeze strength. Thirty high-level rink hockey players (14 y.o.) were allocated to a warm-up low-volume (LVG), high-volume (HVG) protocol, or a control group. Adductor strength change was evaluated over a period of 11 weeks (eight of intervention + three of detraining). Adherence to the intervention and reporting of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) were also collected. Adductor strength increase was significantly higher in HVG compared to LVG (+24%, mean difference 0.68 Nm/kg, <i>p</i> = 0.03) or controls (+34%, mean difference 0.9 Nm/kg, <i>p</i> = 0.009) at the end of the intervention. No significant strength drop was observed after three weeks of detraining in any group (-2.7% - 6%, <i>p</i> = 0.16 - 0.66), while HVG values were still significantly higher compared to controls (+27%, mean difference 0.71 Nm/kg, <i>p</i> = 0.027) at week 11. Compliance was identical in both intervention groups (LVG: 92.3%, HVG: 93.3%) and one case of DOMS was reported across 208 individual sessions (0.48%). The CAE protocol performed twice a week enhances squeeze strength to a further extent compared to one weekly session.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2430875","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this cluster-randomised controlled trial was to investigate the training and detraining effects of two different-volume Copenhagen Adduction Exercise (CAE) protocols on adductor squeeze strength. Thirty high-level rink hockey players (14 y.o.) were allocated to a warm-up low-volume (LVG), high-volume (HVG) protocol, or a control group. Adductor strength change was evaluated over a period of 11 weeks (eight of intervention + three of detraining). Adherence to the intervention and reporting of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) were also collected. Adductor strength increase was significantly higher in HVG compared to LVG (+24%, mean difference 0.68 Nm/kg, p = 0.03) or controls (+34%, mean difference 0.9 Nm/kg, p = 0.009) at the end of the intervention. No significant strength drop was observed after three weeks of detraining in any group (-2.7% - 6%, p = 0.16 - 0.66), while HVG values were still significantly higher compared to controls (+27%, mean difference 0.71 Nm/kg, p = 0.027) at week 11. Compliance was identical in both intervention groups (LVG: 92.3%, HVG: 93.3%) and one case of DOMS was reported across 208 individual sessions (0.48%). The CAE protocol performed twice a week enhances squeeze strength to a further extent compared to one weekly session.

哥本哈根内收训练对高水平青少年曲棍球运动员内收肌力量的剂量反应:三臂随机对照试验
这项分组随机对照试验旨在研究两种不同运动量的哥本哈根内收运动(CAE)方案对内收肌挤压力量的训练和非训练效果。30 名高水平冰球场曲棍球运动员(14 岁)被分配到热身低运动量组(LVG)、高运动量组(HVG)或对照组。在为期 11 周(8 周干预 + 3 周恢复训练)的时间内对内收肌力量变化进行评估。此外,还收集了干预的坚持情况和延迟性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)的报告。在干预结束时,HVG 的内收肌力量增幅明显高于 LVG(+24%,平均差异为 0.68 牛米/公斤,P = 0.03)或对照组(+34%,平均差异为 0.9 牛米/公斤,P = 0.009)。脱离训练三周后,各组的力量均未出现明显下降(-2.7% - 6%,p = 0.16 - 0.66),而在第 11 周时,HVG 值仍明显高于对照组(+27%,平均差异为 0.71 牛米/公斤,p = 0.027)。两个干预组的依从性相同(LVG:92.3%,HVG:93.3%),208 次单次训练中报告了一例 DOMS(0.48%)。每周两次的 CAE 方案与每周一次的方案相比,能进一步增强挤压强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信