Visual and Anatomic Responses in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and a Suboptimal Response to Anti-VEGF Therapy Switched to Faricimab.

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ali Khodor, Stephanie Choi, Tavish Nanda, Jonathan T Caranfa, Raul E Ruiz-Lozano, Shilpa H Desai, Michelle Liang, Caroline R Baumal, David C Reed, Tina S Cleary, Jeffrey S Heier, Chirag P Shah, Andre J Witkin
{"title":"Visual and Anatomic Responses in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and a Suboptimal Response to Anti-VEGF Therapy Switched to Faricimab.","authors":"Ali Khodor, Stephanie Choi, Tavish Nanda, Jonathan T Caranfa, Raul E Ruiz-Lozano, Shilpa H Desai, Michelle Liang, Caroline R Baumal, David C Reed, Tina S Cleary, Jeffrey S Heier, Chirag P Shah, Andre J Witkin","doi":"10.1177/24741264241271649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To determine the efficacy of switching to intravitreal (IVT) faricimab in patients with treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and determine the rates of reversion to original antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with nAMD and persistent fluid on optical coherence tomography previously treated with anti-VEGF injections who received at least 1 IVT faricimab injection between March 1, 2022, and January 31, 2023. <b>Results:</b> The study comprised 135 eyes of 119 patients. Before switching to IVT faricimab, the mean number of anti-VEGF injections in the previous 12 months was 10.7 ± 2.6 (SD) with a mean interval of 4.8 ± 1.3 weeks (range, 2-8). The mean follow-up was 11.6 ± 2 months. Thirty eyes (22.2%) switched to IVT faricimab returned to the original therapy. Of 105 eyes remaining on IVT faricimab, 66 (62.9%) had no fluid at the last follow-up. Compared with the original treatment, there was a significant improvement in logMAR visual acuity at the last follow-up in eyes on IVT faricimab (0.42 vs 0.38; <i>P</i> < .01) and in central subfield thickness (286 µm vs 246 µm; <i>P</i> < .0001). There was also a significant increase in the dosing interval after the third injection vs before IVT faricimab was prescribed (4.8 weeks vs 5.5 weeks; <i>P</i> < .001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Faricimab has a potent drying effect and potential for increasing the injection interval in many eyes with nAMD and persistent fluid on other anti-VEGF agents. Although nearly 25% of eyes reverted to the original therapy because of an insufficient response or adverse events, the majority did not achieve fluid resolution after reversion.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264241271649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264241271649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of switching to intravitreal (IVT) faricimab in patients with treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and determine the rates of reversion to original antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with nAMD and persistent fluid on optical coherence tomography previously treated with anti-VEGF injections who received at least 1 IVT faricimab injection between March 1, 2022, and January 31, 2023. Results: The study comprised 135 eyes of 119 patients. Before switching to IVT faricimab, the mean number of anti-VEGF injections in the previous 12 months was 10.7 ± 2.6 (SD) with a mean interval of 4.8 ± 1.3 weeks (range, 2-8). The mean follow-up was 11.6 ± 2 months. Thirty eyes (22.2%) switched to IVT faricimab returned to the original therapy. Of 105 eyes remaining on IVT faricimab, 66 (62.9%) had no fluid at the last follow-up. Compared with the original treatment, there was a significant improvement in logMAR visual acuity at the last follow-up in eyes on IVT faricimab (0.42 vs 0.38; P < .01) and in central subfield thickness (286 µm vs 246 µm; P < .0001). There was also a significant increase in the dosing interval after the third injection vs before IVT faricimab was prescribed (4.8 weeks vs 5.5 weeks; P < .001). Conclusions: Faricimab has a potent drying effect and potential for increasing the injection interval in many eyes with nAMD and persistent fluid on other anti-VEGF agents. Although nearly 25% of eyes reverted to the original therapy because of an insufficient response or adverse events, the majority did not achieve fluid resolution after reversion.

抗血管内皮生长因子疗法疗效不佳的新生血管性老年黄斑变性患者转用法利单抗后的视觉和解剖反应。
目的:确定治疗耐药的新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)患者改用玻璃体内法尼单抗(IVT)治疗的疗效,并确定改用原来的抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)疗法的比例。方法对曾接受过抗血管内皮生长因子注射治疗、在 2022 年 3 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 31 日期间至少接受过一次 IVT 法替单抗注射的 nAMD 患者和光学相干断层扫描上的持续性积液患者进行回顾性病历审查。研究结果该研究包括 119 名患者的 135 只眼睛。在改用 IVT 法替单抗之前,过去 12 个月中抗血管内皮生长因子注射的平均次数为 10.7 ± 2.6(标度),平均间隔时间为 4.8 ± 1.3 周(范围为 2-8 周)。平均随访时间为 11.6 ± 2 个月。30只(22.2%)改用静脉滴注法替单抗的眼睛又恢复了原来的疗法。在继续使用静脉滴注法替单抗的 105 只眼睛中,66 只(62.9%)在最后一次随访时没有积液。与原来的治疗方法相比,使用 IVT 法尼单抗的眼睛在最后一次随访时的对数 MAR 视力有显著改善(0.42 对 0.38;P P P P 结论:对于许多患有 nAMD 且使用其他抗血管内皮生长因子药物后仍有积液的眼睛来说,法利单抗具有强效的干燥作用和延长注射间隔的潜力。虽然有近 25% 的眼球因反应不充分或不良反应而转回原来的疗法,但大多数眼球在转回原来疗法后积液并没有得到缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信