Sarah Loveday, Natalie White, Leanne Constable, Anthony Gates, Lena Sanci, Sharon Goldfeld, Harriet Hiscock
{"title":"Lessons Learned From the Implementation of an Integrated Health and Social Care Child and Family Hub - a Case Study.","authors":"Sarah Loveday, Natalie White, Leanne Constable, Anthony Gates, Lena Sanci, Sharon Goldfeld, Harriet Hiscock","doi":"10.5334/ijic.8631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Childhood adversity is associated with poor physical and mental health outcomes across the lifespan. Integration of health and social care may provide a solution to childhood adversity through practices of better detection and response. There is growing interest in the creation of child and family hubs that integrate health and social care but little literature that describes the development process.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>We aimed to evaluate and describe the implementation of a co-designed health and social care child and family hub in Victoria, Australia. Rapid ethnographic methodology was used to iterate the hub components. Practitioners and researchers co-created solutions to barriers identified during implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There were five key learnings: (i) Practice change takes time and intensive coaching, (ii) Lived experience is a powerful motivator for practice change, (iii) Integration of services requires more than co-location to break down silos, (iv) Reflective practice is a key driver of practice change, and (v) Using real time data enabled rapid implementation change and directly informed the development of solutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Maintaining and developing practice change during implementation requires time and access to a broad range of data to enable iteration and the development of solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"24 4","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.8631","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Childhood adversity is associated with poor physical and mental health outcomes across the lifespan. Integration of health and social care may provide a solution to childhood adversity through practices of better detection and response. There is growing interest in the creation of child and family hubs that integrate health and social care but little literature that describes the development process.
Description: We aimed to evaluate and describe the implementation of a co-designed health and social care child and family hub in Victoria, Australia. Rapid ethnographic methodology was used to iterate the hub components. Practitioners and researchers co-created solutions to barriers identified during implementation.
Discussion: There were five key learnings: (i) Practice change takes time and intensive coaching, (ii) Lived experience is a powerful motivator for practice change, (iii) Integration of services requires more than co-location to break down silos, (iv) Reflective practice is a key driver of practice change, and (v) Using real time data enabled rapid implementation change and directly informed the development of solutions.
Conclusions: Maintaining and developing practice change during implementation requires time and access to a broad range of data to enable iteration and the development of solutions.
期刊介绍:
Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness.
The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer.
The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).