{"title":"Evaluation and comparison of three high throughput assays (Alinity m CMV, Aptima CMV Quant and cobas CMV) for quantifying CMV DNA in plasma samples","authors":"Jodie D’Costa, Doris Chibo, Katherine Soloczynskyj, Mitchell Batty, Rizmina Sameer, Elaine Lee, Thomas Tran, Dimi Mavroulis, Megan Gooey, Eloise Williams, Kathy Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.jviromet.2024.115068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can cause symptomatic CMV syndrome or tissue-invasive CMV disease in immunocompromised individuals, including solid-organ transplant and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. In these populations, monitoring of CMV load is essential, assessing both risk of disease and response to antiviral therapy. High throughput commercial assays are currently available for CMV quantitation, but they are often evaluated independently, with few studies comparing these assays. This study evaluated CMV quantitative assays for use with the Roche cobas 6800, Abbott Alinity m and Hologic Panther platforms using stored patient plasma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Analytical evaluation was performed using the 1st WHO international standard for human CMV for Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques (cobas and Alinity m) or the Hologic CMV QC Calibrator 6 (Aptima). Parallel testing of 136 clinical plasma samples was performed across the three platforms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Linearity for each assay ranged from 98.6 % to 99.96 % and precision and limit of quantitation were as expected with little variation between platforms. 136 clinical plasma samples were evaluated with similar agreement observed between each assay. The greatest positive agreement was between the Aptima Quant and Alinity m assays (95.6 %, 95 % CI 89–98.6 %) and the lowest between the Aptima Quant and cobas assays (94.1 %, 87.4–97.5 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>All assays were sensitive and accurate when quantifying CMV, and performance across all 3 assays was comparable for monitoring CMV viral loads in patient plasma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of virological methods","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 115068"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of virological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093424001939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can cause symptomatic CMV syndrome or tissue-invasive CMV disease in immunocompromised individuals, including solid-organ transplant and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. In these populations, monitoring of CMV load is essential, assessing both risk of disease and response to antiviral therapy. High throughput commercial assays are currently available for CMV quantitation, but they are often evaluated independently, with few studies comparing these assays. This study evaluated CMV quantitative assays for use with the Roche cobas 6800, Abbott Alinity m and Hologic Panther platforms using stored patient plasma.
Methods
Analytical evaluation was performed using the 1st WHO international standard for human CMV for Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques (cobas and Alinity m) or the Hologic CMV QC Calibrator 6 (Aptima). Parallel testing of 136 clinical plasma samples was performed across the three platforms.
Results
Linearity for each assay ranged from 98.6 % to 99.96 % and precision and limit of quantitation were as expected with little variation between platforms. 136 clinical plasma samples were evaluated with similar agreement observed between each assay. The greatest positive agreement was between the Aptima Quant and Alinity m assays (95.6 %, 95 % CI 89–98.6 %) and the lowest between the Aptima Quant and cobas assays (94.1 %, 87.4–97.5 %).
Conclusions
All assays were sensitive and accurate when quantifying CMV, and performance across all 3 assays was comparable for monitoring CMV viral loads in patient plasma.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Virological Methods focuses on original, high quality research papers that describe novel and comprehensively tested methods which enhance human, animal, plant, bacterial or environmental virology and prions research and discovery.
The methods may include, but not limited to, the study of:
Viral components and morphology-
Virus isolation, propagation and development of viral vectors-
Viral pathogenesis, oncogenesis, vaccines and antivirals-
Virus replication, host-pathogen interactions and responses-
Virus transmission, prevention, control and treatment-
Viral metagenomics and virome-
Virus ecology, adaption and evolution-
Applied virology such as nanotechnology-
Viral diagnosis with novelty and comprehensive evaluation.
We seek articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and laboratory protocols that include comprehensive technical details with statistical confirmations that provide validations against current best practice, international standards or quality assurance programs and which advance knowledge in virology leading to improved medical, veterinary or agricultural practices and management.