Optimal Number of Replications for Obtaining Stable Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Xinran Liu, Daniel McNeish
{"title":"Optimal Number of Replications for Obtaining Stable Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs.","authors":"Xinran Liu, Daniel McNeish","doi":"10.1177/00131644241290172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Factor analysis is commonly used in behavioral sciences to measure latent constructs, and researchers routinely consider approximate fit indices to ensure adequate model fit and to provide important validity evidence. Due to a lack of generalizable fit index cutoffs, methodologists suggest simulation-based methods to create customized cutoffs that allow researchers to assess model fit more accurately. However, simulation-based methods are computationally intensive. An open question is: How many simulation replications are needed for these custom cutoffs to stabilize? This Monte Carlo simulation study focuses on one such simulation-based method-dynamic fit index (DFI) cutoffs-to determine the optimal number of replications for obtaining stable cutoffs. Results indicated that the DFI approach generates stable cutoffs with 500 replications (the currently recommended number), but the process can be more efficient with fewer replications, especially in simulations with categorical data. Using fewer replications significantly reduces the computational time for determining cutoff values with minimal impact on the results. For one-factor or three-factor models, results suggested that in most conditions 200 DFI replications were optimal for balancing fit index cutoff stability and computational efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"00131644241290172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644241290172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Factor analysis is commonly used in behavioral sciences to measure latent constructs, and researchers routinely consider approximate fit indices to ensure adequate model fit and to provide important validity evidence. Due to a lack of generalizable fit index cutoffs, methodologists suggest simulation-based methods to create customized cutoffs that allow researchers to assess model fit more accurately. However, simulation-based methods are computationally intensive. An open question is: How many simulation replications are needed for these custom cutoffs to stabilize? This Monte Carlo simulation study focuses on one such simulation-based method-dynamic fit index (DFI) cutoffs-to determine the optimal number of replications for obtaining stable cutoffs. Results indicated that the DFI approach generates stable cutoffs with 500 replications (the currently recommended number), but the process can be more efficient with fewer replications, especially in simulations with categorical data. Using fewer replications significantly reduces the computational time for determining cutoff values with minimal impact on the results. For one-factor or three-factor models, results suggested that in most conditions 200 DFI replications were optimal for balancing fit index cutoff stability and computational efficiency.

获得稳定动态拟合指数临界值的最佳重复次数
因子分析常用于行为科学中潜在结构的测量,研究人员通常会考虑近似的拟合指数,以确保模型充分拟合并提供重要的有效性证据。由于缺乏通用的拟合指数临界值,方法论专家建议采用基于模拟的方法来创建自定义临界值,以便研究人员更准确地评估模型拟合度。然而,基于模拟的方法需要大量计算。一个悬而未决的问题是:需要多少次模拟重复才能使这些自定义截断值趋于稳定?这项蒙特卡洛模拟研究主要针对这样一种基于模拟的方法--动态拟合指数(DFI)截断值,以确定获得稳定截断值的最佳重复次数。研究结果表明,DFI 方法可以通过 500 次重复(目前推荐的次数)生成稳定的临界值,但如果重复次数更少,这一过程的效率会更高,尤其是在使用分类数据进行模拟时。使用更少的重复次数可以大大减少确定临界值的计算时间,而对结果的影响却很小。对于单因素或三因素模型,结果表明,在大多数情况下,200 次 DFI 重复是兼顾拟合指数临界值稳定性和计算效率的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Educational and Psychological Measurement 医学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Educational and Psychological Measurement (EPM) publishes referred scholarly work from all academic disciplines interested in the study of measurement theory, problems, and issues. Theoretical articles address new developments and techniques, and applied articles deal with innovation applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信