Model Based on Ultrasound Radiomics and Machine Learning to Preoperative Differentiation of Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Yiwen Deng, Qiao Zeng, Yu Zhao, Zhen Hu, Changmiao Zhan, Liangyun Guo, Binghuang Lai, Zhiping Huang, Zhiyong Fu, Chunquan Zhang
{"title":"Model Based on Ultrasound Radiomics and Machine Learning to Preoperative Differentiation of Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm.","authors":"Yiwen Deng, Qiao Zeng, Yu Zhao, Zhen Hu, Changmiao Zhan, Liangyun Guo, Binghuang Lai, Zhiping Huang, Zhiyong Fu, Chunquan Zhang","doi":"10.1002/jum.16620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the value of radiomics based on ultrasonography in differentiating follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) and follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) and construct a tool for preoperative noninvasive predicting FTC and FTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data and ultrasound images of 389 patients diagnosed with FTC or FTA postoperatively were retrospectively analyzed at 3 institutions from January 2017 to December 2023. Patients in our hospital were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio to training cohort and validation cohort. External test cohort consisted of data collected from other 2 hospitals. Radiomics features were used to develop models based on different machine learning classifiers. A combined model was developed combining radiomics features with clinical characteristics and a nomogram was depicted. The performance of the models was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve and decision curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiomics model based on random forest showed best performance in discriminating FTC and FTA, with AUCs 0.880 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8290-0.9308), 0.871 (95% CI: 0.7690-0.9734), and 0.821 (95% CI: 0.7036-0.9389) in training, validation, and test cohort, respectively. The combined model presented better efficacy comparing with clinical model and radiomics model, with AUCs 0.883 (95% CI: 0.8359-0.9295), 0.874 (95% CI: 0.7873-0.9615), and 0.876 (0.7809-0.9714) in training, validation, and test cohort, respectively. The calibration curves suggested good consistency and decision curves showed the highest overall clinical benefit for the combined model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound radiomics model based on random forest is feasible to differentiate FTC and FTA, and the combined model is an intuitively noninvasive tool for FTC and FTA preoperative identification.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the value of radiomics based on ultrasonography in differentiating follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) and follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) and construct a tool for preoperative noninvasive predicting FTC and FTA.

Methods: The clinical data and ultrasound images of 389 patients diagnosed with FTC or FTA postoperatively were retrospectively analyzed at 3 institutions from January 2017 to December 2023. Patients in our hospital were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio to training cohort and validation cohort. External test cohort consisted of data collected from other 2 hospitals. Radiomics features were used to develop models based on different machine learning classifiers. A combined model was developed combining radiomics features with clinical characteristics and a nomogram was depicted. The performance of the models was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve and decision curve.

Results: Radiomics model based on random forest showed best performance in discriminating FTC and FTA, with AUCs 0.880 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8290-0.9308), 0.871 (95% CI: 0.7690-0.9734), and 0.821 (95% CI: 0.7036-0.9389) in training, validation, and test cohort, respectively. The combined model presented better efficacy comparing with clinical model and radiomics model, with AUCs 0.883 (95% CI: 0.8359-0.9295), 0.874 (95% CI: 0.7873-0.9615), and 0.876 (0.7809-0.9714) in training, validation, and test cohort, respectively. The calibration curves suggested good consistency and decision curves showed the highest overall clinical benefit for the combined model.

Conclusions: Ultrasound radiomics model based on random forest is feasible to differentiate FTC and FTA, and the combined model is an intuitively noninvasive tool for FTC and FTA preoperative identification.

基于超声放射组学和机器学习的甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤术前分化模型
研究目的评估基于超声造影的放射组学在鉴别甲状腺滤泡癌(FTC)和甲状腺滤泡腺瘤(FTA)中的价值,并构建术前无创预测FTC和FTA的工具:回顾性分析了2017年1月至2023年12月期间3家机构389例术后诊断为FTC或FTA患者的临床数据和超声图像。本院患者按 7:3 的比例随机分配到训练队列和验证队列。外部测试队列由其他两家医院收集的数据组成。放射组学特征被用于开发基于不同机器学习分类器的模型。结合放射组学特征和临床特征建立了一个综合模型,并绘制了一个提名图。模型的性能通过接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、校准曲线和决策曲线进行评估:基于随机森林的放射组学模型在鉴别 FTC 和 FTA 方面表现最佳,在训练队列、验证队列和测试队列中的 AUC 分别为 0.880(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.8290-0.9308)、0.871(95% CI:0.7690-0.9734)和 0.821(95% CI:0.7036-0.9389)。与临床模型和放射组学模型相比,联合模型具有更好的疗效,在训练队列、验证队列和测试队列中的AUC分别为0.883(95% CI:0.8359-0.9295)、0.874(95% CI:0.7873-0.9615)和0.876(0.7809-0.9714)。校准曲线显示出良好的一致性,而决策曲线则显示出组合模型的总体临床效益最高:结论:基于随机森林的超声放射组学模型可用于鉴别 FTC 和 FTA,该组合模型是一种直观无创的 FTC 和 FTA 术前鉴别工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信