Comfort advantages demonstrated with a novel soft contact lens: A randomized clinical trial.

IF 3.4 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Heliyon Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39995
John R Buch, Patricia Martin, Jie Xu
{"title":"Comfort advantages demonstrated with a novel soft contact lens: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"John R Buch, Patricia Martin, Jie Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare comfort outcomes between a novel daily disposable contact lens - designed to maximize comfort - and an established control. The hypothesis was that the test lens would be superior to the control for four key comfort questionnaire items: end-of-day comfort, all-day comfort, visual comfort while driving at night, and reduction of ocular fatigue from digital device use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, controlled, subject-masked, parallel-arm study enrolled young (18-39 years), healthy, myopic, contact lens wearers with an up-to-date prescription at 19 investigational sites in the United States. Subjects wore either the test (ACUVUE® OASYS MAX 1-Day, senofilcon A) or control (Dailies Total1®, delefilcon A) lens for 2 weeks of bilateral, daily disposable wear before completing comfort questionnaire items, each of which had 5 or 6 response options. For each item, the odds ratio for positive (top-two-box) responses was estimated from a binomial generalized linear mixed model. A gatekeeping approach combined with the truncated Hochberg procedure was used for multiplicity adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 344 enrolled subjects, 342 subjects were randomized and dispensed lenses, with 171 subjects per lens group. Among the 342 subjects, 68.4% were female, 83.6% were White, and the average age was 29.7 (±5.53) years. The test lens was statistically superior to the control for all four comfort questions: odds ratios (test vs. control) were 2.01 (95% CI: 1.25, 3.22) for end-of-day comfort, 2.17 (alpha-adjusted CI: 1.30, 3.64) for all-day comfort, 2.00 (alpha-adjusted CI: 1.18, 3.41) for reducing ocular fatigue from digital device use, and 1.77 (95% CI: 1.04, 3.02) for comfortable vision while driving at night.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The test lens demonstrated statistically superior physical and visual comfort, as measured by the four comfort endpoints, compared to the control. The test lens had significantly greater odds of favorable responses for all comfort items compared to the control.</p>","PeriodicalId":12894,"journal":{"name":"Heliyon","volume":"10 21","pages":"e39995"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heliyon","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39995","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare comfort outcomes between a novel daily disposable contact lens - designed to maximize comfort - and an established control. The hypothesis was that the test lens would be superior to the control for four key comfort questionnaire items: end-of-day comfort, all-day comfort, visual comfort while driving at night, and reduction of ocular fatigue from digital device use.

Methods: This randomized, controlled, subject-masked, parallel-arm study enrolled young (18-39 years), healthy, myopic, contact lens wearers with an up-to-date prescription at 19 investigational sites in the United States. Subjects wore either the test (ACUVUE® OASYS MAX 1-Day, senofilcon A) or control (Dailies Total1®, delefilcon A) lens for 2 weeks of bilateral, daily disposable wear before completing comfort questionnaire items, each of which had 5 or 6 response options. For each item, the odds ratio for positive (top-two-box) responses was estimated from a binomial generalized linear mixed model. A gatekeeping approach combined with the truncated Hochberg procedure was used for multiplicity adjustment.

Results: Of 344 enrolled subjects, 342 subjects were randomized and dispensed lenses, with 171 subjects per lens group. Among the 342 subjects, 68.4% were female, 83.6% were White, and the average age was 29.7 (±5.53) years. The test lens was statistically superior to the control for all four comfort questions: odds ratios (test vs. control) were 2.01 (95% CI: 1.25, 3.22) for end-of-day comfort, 2.17 (alpha-adjusted CI: 1.30, 3.64) for all-day comfort, 2.00 (alpha-adjusted CI: 1.18, 3.41) for reducing ocular fatigue from digital device use, and 1.77 (95% CI: 1.04, 3.02) for comfortable vision while driving at night.

Conclusion: The test lens demonstrated statistically superior physical and visual comfort, as measured by the four comfort endpoints, compared to the control. The test lens had significantly greater odds of favorable responses for all comfort items compared to the control.

新型软性隐形眼镜的舒适优势:随机临床试验
目的:比较一种新型日抛隐形眼镜(旨在最大限度地提高舒适度)和一种成熟的对照镜片的舒适度结果。假设测试镜片在以下四个关键的舒适度问卷项目上优于对照镜片:日终舒适度、全天舒适度、夜间驾驶时的视觉舒适度,以及减少因使用数字设备造成的眼部疲劳:这项随机对照、受试者掩蔽、平行臂研究在美国的 19 个调查点招募了年轻(18-39 岁)、健康、近视、有最新处方的隐形眼镜佩戴者。受试者佩戴测试镜片(ACUVUE® OASYS MAX 1-Day,senofilcon A)或对照镜片(Dailies Total1®,delefilcon A)进行为期两周的双侧每日抛型佩戴,然后完成舒适度问卷调查,每个项目有 5 或 6 个回答选项。对于每个项目,都通过二叉广义线性混合模型估算出正面回答(前两格)的几率比。采用把关法结合截断霍奇伯格程序进行多重性调整:在 344 名注册受试者中,342 名受试者被随机分配了镜片,每个镜片组有 171 名受试者。在 342 名受试者中,68.4% 为女性,83.6% 为白人,平均年龄为 29.7 (±5.53) 岁。在所有四个舒适度问题上,测试镜片在统计学上都优于对照镜片:日终舒适度的几率比(测试镜片 vs. 对照镜片)为 2.01(95% CI:1.25, 3.22),全天舒适度为 2.17(经阿尔法调整的 CI:1.30, 3.64),减少因使用数字设备造成的眼部疲劳的几率比为 2.00(经阿尔法调整的 CI:1.18, 3.41),夜间驾驶视力舒适度为 1.77(95% CI:1.04, 3.02):与对照组相比,测试镜片在四项舒适度终点指标上都表现出了更高的物理和视觉舒适度。与对照组相比,测试镜片在所有舒适度项目上的良好反应几率明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heliyon
Heliyon MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
2793
期刊介绍: Heliyon is an all-science, open access journal that is part of the Cell Press family. Any paper reporting scientifically accurate and valuable research, which adheres to accepted ethical and scientific publishing standards, will be considered for publication. Our growing team of dedicated section editors, along with our in-house team, handle your paper and manage the publication process end-to-end, giving your research the editorial support it deserves.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信