Personalized risk prediction of mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure in patients undergoing mitral valve repair surgery.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1470987
Ning Zhou, Kui Zhang, Bokang Qiao, Cong Chen, Xiaobo Guo, Wei Fu, Jubing Zheng, Jie Du, Ran Dong
{"title":"Personalized risk prediction of mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure in patients undergoing mitral valve repair surgery.","authors":"Ning Zhou, Kui Zhang, Bokang Qiao, Cong Chen, Xiaobo Guo, Wei Fu, Jubing Zheng, Jie Du, Ran Dong","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1470987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurately assessing the postoperative mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure risks in patients undergoing mitral valve repair surgery is of significant importance for individualized medical strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to develop and validate a risk assessment system for the prediction of mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Personalized risk prediction system of mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure was developed. For developing a prediction system with death as the outcome, there were 965 patients (70%) and 413 patients (30%) were included in the the derivation cohort and the validation cohort. For developing a prediction system with rehospitalization for heart failure as the outcome, there were 927 patients (70%) and 398 patients (30%) were included in the derivation cohort and the validation cohort. There were 42 routine clinical variables used to develop the models. The performance evaluation of the model is based on the area under the curve (AUC). Evaluate the improvement with Euro Score II according to NRI and IDI net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up time was 685 days, the incidence of death was 3.85% (<i>n</i> = 53), and the incidence of rehospitalization for heart failure was 10.01% (<i>n</i> = 138). The AUC values of the mortality prediction model in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.825 (0.764-0.886) and 0.808 (0.699-0.917), respectively. The AUC values of the rehospitalization for heart failure prediction model in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.794 (0.756-0.832) and 0.812 (0.758-0.866), respectively. NRI and IDI showed that the mortality prediction model exhibited superior performance than the Euro Score II. The mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure risk prediction models effectively stratified patients into different risk subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed and validated models exhibit satisfactory performance in prediction of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure after mitral valve repair surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: (NCT05141292).</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1470987"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1470987","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurately assessing the postoperative mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure risks in patients undergoing mitral valve repair surgery is of significant importance for individualized medical strategies.

Objective: We sought to develop and validate a risk assessment system for the prediction of mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure.

Methods: Personalized risk prediction system of mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure was developed. For developing a prediction system with death as the outcome, there were 965 patients (70%) and 413 patients (30%) were included in the the derivation cohort and the validation cohort. For developing a prediction system with rehospitalization for heart failure as the outcome, there were 927 patients (70%) and 398 patients (30%) were included in the derivation cohort and the validation cohort. There were 42 routine clinical variables used to develop the models. The performance evaluation of the model is based on the area under the curve (AUC). Evaluate the improvement with Euro Score II according to NRI and IDI net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results: The median follow-up time was 685 days, the incidence of death was 3.85% (n = 53), and the incidence of rehospitalization for heart failure was 10.01% (n = 138). The AUC values of the mortality prediction model in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.825 (0.764-0.886) and 0.808 (0.699-0.917), respectively. The AUC values of the rehospitalization for heart failure prediction model in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.794 (0.756-0.832) and 0.812 (0.758-0.866), respectively. NRI and IDI showed that the mortality prediction model exhibited superior performance than the Euro Score II. The mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure risk prediction models effectively stratified patients into different risk subgroups.

Conclusion: The developed and validated models exhibit satisfactory performance in prediction of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure after mitral valve repair surgery.

Clinical trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: (NCT05141292).

二尖瓣修复手术患者死亡率和心衰再住院的个性化风险预测。
背景:准确评估二尖瓣修复手术患者的术后死亡率和心衰再住院风险对个体化医疗策略具有重要意义:我们试图开发并验证一套预测心衰死亡率和再住院率的风险评估系统:方法:开发心力衰竭死亡率和再住院率的个性化风险预测系统。在开发以死亡为结果的预测系统时,965 名患者(70%)和 413 名患者(30%)被纳入推导队列和验证队列。在开发以心衰再住院为结果的预测系统时,衍生队列和验证队列中分别纳入了 927 名患者(70%)和 398 名患者(30%)。共有 42 个常规临床变量用于建立模型。模型的性能评估基于曲线下面积(AUC)。根据净再分类改进(NRI)和综合辨别改进(IDI)评估欧洲评分 II 的改进情况:中位随访时间为 685 天,死亡发生率为 3.85%(n = 53),心衰再住院发生率为 10.01%(n = 138)。推导队列和验证队列中死亡率预测模型的AUC值分别为0.825(0.764-0.886)和0.808(0.699-0.917)。心衰再住院预测模型在推导组和验证组中的AUC值分别为0.794(0.756-0.832)和0.812(0.758-0.866)。NRI和IDI显示,死亡率预测模型的性能优于欧洲评分II。死亡率和心衰再住院风险预测模型有效地将患者分为不同的风险亚组:临床试验注册:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov,唯一标识符:(NCT05141292)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信