Decoding the Challenges: navigating Intact Peptide Mass Spectrometry-Based Analysis for Biological Applications.

IF 4.2 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Mariano De Cristofaro, Alessio Lenzi, Silvia Ghimenti, Denise Biagini, Giulia Bertazzo, Federico Maria Vivaldi, Silvia Armenia, Nicola Riccardo Pugliese, Stefano Masi, Fabio Di Francesco, Tommaso Lomonaco
{"title":"Decoding the Challenges: navigating Intact Peptide Mass Spectrometry-Based Analysis for Biological Applications.","authors":"Mariano De Cristofaro, Alessio Lenzi, Silvia Ghimenti, Denise Biagini, Giulia Bertazzo, Federico Maria Vivaldi, Silvia Armenia, Nicola Riccardo Pugliese, Stefano Masi, Fabio Di Francesco, Tommaso Lomonaco","doi":"10.1080/10408347.2024.2427140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative analysis of peptides in biological fluids offers a high diagnostic and prognostic tool to reflect the pathophysiological condition of the patient. Recently, methods based on liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) for the quantitative determination of intact peptides have been replacing traditionally used ligand-binding assays, which suffer from cross-reactivity issues. The use of \"top-down\" analysis of peptides is rapidly increasing since it does not undergo incomplete or non-reproducible digestion like \"bottom-up\" approaches. However, the low abundance of peptides and their peculiar characteristics, as well as the complexity of biological fluids, make their quantification challenging. Herein, the analytical pitfalls that may be encountered during the development of an LC-MS method for the analysis of intact peptides in biological fluids are discussed. Challenges in the pre-analytical phase, stability after sampling and sample processing, significantly impact the accuracy of peptide quantification. Emerging techniques, such as microextractions, are becoming crucial for improved sample cleanup and enrichment of target analytes. A comparison between the roles of high-resolution and low-resolution mass spectrometry in the quantification of intact peptides, as well as the introduction of supercharging reagents to enhance ionization, will be discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10744,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2024.2427140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative analysis of peptides in biological fluids offers a high diagnostic and prognostic tool to reflect the pathophysiological condition of the patient. Recently, methods based on liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) for the quantitative determination of intact peptides have been replacing traditionally used ligand-binding assays, which suffer from cross-reactivity issues. The use of "top-down" analysis of peptides is rapidly increasing since it does not undergo incomplete or non-reproducible digestion like "bottom-up" approaches. However, the low abundance of peptides and their peculiar characteristics, as well as the complexity of biological fluids, make their quantification challenging. Herein, the analytical pitfalls that may be encountered during the development of an LC-MS method for the analysis of intact peptides in biological fluids are discussed. Challenges in the pre-analytical phase, stability after sampling and sample processing, significantly impact the accuracy of peptide quantification. Emerging techniques, such as microextractions, are becoming crucial for improved sample cleanup and enrichment of target analytes. A comparison between the roles of high-resolution and low-resolution mass spectrometry in the quantification of intact peptides, as well as the introduction of supercharging reagents to enhance ionization, will be discussed.

解码挑战:基于完整肽质谱分析的生物应用导航。
对生物液体中的肽进行定量分析,是反映病人病理生理状况的重要诊断和预后工具。最近,基于液相色谱-质谱联用技术(LC-MS)的完整肽定量测定方法正在取代受交叉反应问题困扰的传统配体结合测定方法。由于肽的 "自上而下 "分析不像 "自下而上 "的方法那样需要进行不完全或不可再现的消化,因此肽的 "自上而下 "分析正在迅速增加。然而,由于肽的丰度低、特性特殊以及生物液体的复杂性,肽的定量分析具有挑战性。本文讨论了在开发用于分析生物液体中完整多肽的 LC-MS 方法过程中可能遇到的分析陷阱。分析前阶段的挑战、采样后的稳定性和样品处理都会对肽定量的准确性产生重大影响。微萃取等新兴技术正成为改进样品净化和富集目标分析物的关键。此外,还将讨论高分辨率和低分辨率质谱在完整肽定量中的作用比较,以及引入增压试剂以增强电离效果的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry continues to be a dependable resource for both the expert and the student by providing in-depth, scholarly, insightful reviews of important topics within the discipline of analytical chemistry and related measurement sciences. The journal exclusively publishes review articles that illuminate the underlying science, that evaluate the field''s status by putting recent developments into proper perspective and context, and that speculate on possible future developments. A limited number of articles are of a "tutorial" format written by experts for scientists seeking introduction or clarification in a new area. This journal serves as a forum for linking various underlying components in broad and interdisciplinary means, while maintaining balance between applied and fundamental research. Topics we are interested in receiving reviews on are the following: · chemical analysis; · instrumentation; · chemometrics; · analytical biochemistry; · medicinal analysis; · forensics; · environmental sciences; · applied physics; · and material science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信