Comparison of tissue damage and inflammation for robotic laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy in early endometrial cancer.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1492469
Shengnan Meng, Yanling Cao, Qingwei Shen, Ling Dong, Nan Wang
{"title":"Comparison of tissue damage and inflammation for robotic laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy in early endometrial cancer.","authors":"Shengnan Meng, Yanling Cao, Qingwei Shen, Ling Dong, Nan Wang","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1492469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study was to analyze the dynamics of tissue damage and inflammatory response markers perioperatively and whether these differ between robotic laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy in early endometrial cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized controlled trial conducted at SHANGHAI FIRST MATERNITY and INFANT HOSPITAL, eighty women with early-stage, low-risk endometrial cancer were randomly assigned to receive either robotic or conventional laparoscopy. Blood samples were collected at admission, immediately before surgery, 2 h after surgery, 24 h after surgery, 48 h after surgery, and 1 week after surgery. The samples were analyzed for various biomarkers associated with inflammatory processes and tissue damage. These included high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count, interleukin-6 (IL-6), cortisol, creatine kinase (CK), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-<i>α</i>). These markers provide insights into the underlying physiological responses and potential tissue-level changes within the study participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in clinical and preoperative data between two groups. The results showed that the patients who underwent robotic laparoscopy had a longer pre-surgical time compared to the conventional laparoscopy group. However, the robotic group had shorter operating times, quicker vaginal cuff closures, and lower estimated blood loss compared to the conventional laparoscopy group. The hospital stays, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and drainage volume on the first day after operation were lower in robotic group compared to conventional laparoscopy group. hs-CRP, WBC, IL-6 and cortisol were significantly lower in the robotic group, though the differences were transient.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrated that robotic laparoscopy, used in early endometrial cancer treatment, leads to a reduced inflammatory response, less tissue damage, and lower stress levels, as evidenced by decreased levels of hs-CRP, IL-6, and cortisol, compared to conventional laparoscopy. These findings suggest that robot- laparoscopy may facilitate a quicker recovery and improve patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1492469"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1492469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study was to analyze the dynamics of tissue damage and inflammatory response markers perioperatively and whether these differ between robotic laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy in early endometrial cancer.

Methods: In a randomized controlled trial conducted at SHANGHAI FIRST MATERNITY and INFANT HOSPITAL, eighty women with early-stage, low-risk endometrial cancer were randomly assigned to receive either robotic or conventional laparoscopy. Blood samples were collected at admission, immediately before surgery, 2 h after surgery, 24 h after surgery, 48 h after surgery, and 1 week after surgery. The samples were analyzed for various biomarkers associated with inflammatory processes and tissue damage. These included high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count, interleukin-6 (IL-6), cortisol, creatine kinase (CK), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). These markers provide insights into the underlying physiological responses and potential tissue-level changes within the study participants.

Results: There was no significant difference in clinical and preoperative data between two groups. The results showed that the patients who underwent robotic laparoscopy had a longer pre-surgical time compared to the conventional laparoscopy group. However, the robotic group had shorter operating times, quicker vaginal cuff closures, and lower estimated blood loss compared to the conventional laparoscopy group. The hospital stays, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and drainage volume on the first day after operation were lower in robotic group compared to conventional laparoscopy group. hs-CRP, WBC, IL-6 and cortisol were significantly lower in the robotic group, though the differences were transient.

Discussion: This study demonstrated that robotic laparoscopy, used in early endometrial cancer treatment, leads to a reduced inflammatory response, less tissue damage, and lower stress levels, as evidenced by decreased levels of hs-CRP, IL-6, and cortisol, compared to conventional laparoscopy. These findings suggest that robot- laparoscopy may facilitate a quicker recovery and improve patient-reported outcomes.

在早期子宫内膜癌中比较机器人腹腔镜和传统腹腔镜对组织的损伤和炎症。
引言本研究旨在分析早期子宫内膜癌患者围手术期组织损伤和炎症反应指标的动态变化,以及机器人腹腔镜手术和传统腹腔镜手术在这些指标上是否存在差异:在上海第一妇婴保健院进行的一项随机对照试验中,80名患有早期、低风险子宫内膜癌的妇女被随机分配接受机器人腹腔镜或传统腹腔镜手术。在入院时、手术前、手术后 2 小时、手术后 24 小时、手术后 48 小时和手术后 1 周采集血液样本。对样本进行了分析,以检测与炎症过程和组织损伤相关的各种生物标记物。这些指标包括高敏 C 反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞计数(WBC)、血小板计数、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、皮质醇、肌酸激酶(CK)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)。这些指标有助于了解研究参与者体内潜在的生理反应和组织水平的变化:两组患者的临床和术前数据无明显差异。结果显示,与传统腹腔镜手术组相比,接受机器人腹腔镜手术的患者术前时间更长。不过,与传统腹腔镜手术组相比,机器人腹腔镜手术组的手术时间更短、阴道袖带闭合更快、估计失血量更低。与传统腹腔镜手术组相比,机器人手术组的住院时间、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和术后第一天的引流量更低:本研究表明,与传统腹腔镜手术相比,机器人腹腔镜手术用于早期子宫内膜癌治疗时,会导致炎症反应减轻、组织损伤减少和应激水平降低,这从hs-CRP、IL-6和皮质醇水平的降低中可见一斑。这些研究结果表明,机器人腹腔镜手术可以促进患者更快地康复,并改善患者报告的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信