A study of machine learning to predict NRDS severity based on lung ultrasound score and clinical indicators.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1481830
Chunyan Huang, Xiaoming Ha, Yanfang Cui, Hongxia Zhang
{"title":"A study of machine learning to predict NRDS severity based on lung ultrasound score and clinical indicators.","authors":"Chunyan Huang, Xiaoming Ha, Yanfang Cui, Hongxia Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1481830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop predictive models for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) using machine learning algorithms to improve the accuracy of severity predictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind cohort study included 230 neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Yantaishan Hospital between December 2020 and June 2023. Of these, 119 neonates were diagnosed with NRDS and placed in the NRDS group, while 111 neonates with other conditions formed the non-NRDS (N-NRDS) group. All neonates underwent lung ultrasound and various clinical assessments, with data collected on the oxygenation index (OI), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), respiratory index (RI), and lung ultrasound score (LUS). An independent sample test was used to compare the groups' LUS, OI, RI, SOFA scores, and clinical data. Use Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression to identify predictor variables, and construct a model for predicting NRDS severity using logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (NN), and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms. The importance of predictive variables and performance metrics was evaluated for each model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NRDS group showed significantly higher LUS, SOFA, and RI scores and lower OI values than the N-NRDS group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). LUS, SOFA, and RI scores were significantly higher in the severe NRDS group compared to the mild and moderate groups, while OI was markedly lower (<i>p</i> < 0.01). LUS, OI, RI, and SOFA scores were the most impactful variables for the predictive efficacy of the models. The RF model performed best of the four models, with an AUC of 0.894, accuracy of 0.808, and sensitivity of 0.706. In contrast, the LR, NN, and SVM models have lower AUC values than the RF model with 0.841, 0.828, and 0.726, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Four predictive models based on machine learning can accurately assess the severity of NRDS. Among them, the RF model exhibits the best predictive performance, offering more effective support for the treatment and care of neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1481830"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1481830","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop predictive models for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) using machine learning algorithms to improve the accuracy of severity predictions.

Methods: This double-blind cohort study included 230 neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Yantaishan Hospital between December 2020 and June 2023. Of these, 119 neonates were diagnosed with NRDS and placed in the NRDS group, while 111 neonates with other conditions formed the non-NRDS (N-NRDS) group. All neonates underwent lung ultrasound and various clinical assessments, with data collected on the oxygenation index (OI), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), respiratory index (RI), and lung ultrasound score (LUS). An independent sample test was used to compare the groups' LUS, OI, RI, SOFA scores, and clinical data. Use Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression to identify predictor variables, and construct a model for predicting NRDS severity using logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (NN), and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms. The importance of predictive variables and performance metrics was evaluated for each model.

Results: The NRDS group showed significantly higher LUS, SOFA, and RI scores and lower OI values than the N-NRDS group (p < 0.01). LUS, SOFA, and RI scores were significantly higher in the severe NRDS group compared to the mild and moderate groups, while OI was markedly lower (p < 0.01). LUS, OI, RI, and SOFA scores were the most impactful variables for the predictive efficacy of the models. The RF model performed best of the four models, with an AUC of 0.894, accuracy of 0.808, and sensitivity of 0.706. In contrast, the LR, NN, and SVM models have lower AUC values than the RF model with 0.841, 0.828, and 0.726, respectively.

Conclusion: Four predictive models based on machine learning can accurately assess the severity of NRDS. Among them, the RF model exhibits the best predictive performance, offering more effective support for the treatment and care of neonates.

基于肺部超声波评分和临床指标预测 NRDS 严重程度的机器学习研究。
目的:利用机器学习算法开发新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)预测模型:利用机器学习算法开发新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)预测模型,以提高严重程度预测的准确性:这项双盲队列研究纳入了2020年12月至2023年6月期间入住烟台山医院新生儿重症监护室(NICU)的230名新生儿。其中,119 名新生儿被诊断为 NRDS 并被归入 NRDS 组,111 名患有其他疾病的新生儿被归入非 NRDS(N-NRDS)组。所有新生儿都接受了肺部超声检查和各种临床评估,并收集了氧合指数(OI)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、呼吸指数(RI)和肺部超声评分(LUS)等数据。采用独立样本检验比较各组的 LUS、OI、RI、SOFA 评分和临床数据。使用最小绝对收缩和选择操作器(LASSO)回归确定预测变量,并使用逻辑回归(LR)、随机森林(RF)、人工神经网络(NN)和支持向量机(SVM)算法构建预测 NRDS 严重程度的模型。对每个模型的预测变量和性能指标的重要性进行了评估:结果:与 N-NRDS 组相比,NRDS 组的 LUS、SOFA 和 RI 分数明显更高,OI 值更低(p p 结论:NRDS 组的 LUS、SOFA 和 RI 分数明显更高,OI 值更低(p p 结论):四个基于机器学习的预测模型可以准确评估 NRDS 的严重程度。其中,RF 模型的预测性能最佳,可为新生儿的治疗和护理提供更有效的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信