Machine learning for stroke in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction but without atrial fibrillation: A post-hoc analysis of the WARCEF trial.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hironori Ishiguchi, Yang Chen, Bi Huang, Ying Gue, Elon Correa, Shunichi Homma, John L P Thompson, Min Qian, Gregory Y H Lip, Azmil H Abdul-Rahim
{"title":"Machine learning for stroke in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction but without atrial fibrillation: A post-hoc analysis of the WARCEF trial.","authors":"Hironori Ishiguchi, Yang Chen, Bi Huang, Ying Gue, Elon Correa, Shunichi Homma, John L P Thompson, Min Qian, Gregory Y H Lip, Azmil H Abdul-Rahim","doi":"10.1111/eci.14360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prediction of ischaemic stroke in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but without atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) in identifying the development of ischaemic stroke in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a post-hoc analysis of the WARCEF trial, only including patients without a history of AF. We evaluated the performance of 9 ML models for identifying incident stroke using metrics including area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis. The importance of each feature used in the model was ranked by SAPley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2213 patients with HFrEF but without AF (mean age 58 ± 11 years; 80% male). Of these, 74 (3.3%) had an ischaemic stroke in sinus rhythm during a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 1.8 years. Out of the 29 patient-demographics variables, 12 were selected for the ML training. Almost all ML models demonstrated high AUC values, outperforming the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score (AUC: 0.643, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.512-0.767). The Support Vector Machine (SVM) and XGBoost models achieved the highest AUCs, with 0.874 (95% CI: 0.769-0.959) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.783-0.953), respectively. The SVM and LightGBM consistently provided significant net clinical benefits. Key features consistently identified across these models were creatinine clearance (CrCl), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and warfarin use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine-learning models can be useful in identifying incident ischaemic strokes in patients with HFrEF but without AF. CrCl, BUN and warfarin use were the key features.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e14360"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prediction of ischaemic stroke in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but without atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) in identifying the development of ischaemic stroke in this population.

Methods: We performed a post-hoc analysis of the WARCEF trial, only including patients without a history of AF. We evaluated the performance of 9 ML models for identifying incident stroke using metrics including area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis. The importance of each feature used in the model was ranked by SAPley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values.

Results: We included 2213 patients with HFrEF but without AF (mean age 58 ± 11 years; 80% male). Of these, 74 (3.3%) had an ischaemic stroke in sinus rhythm during a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 1.8 years. Out of the 29 patient-demographics variables, 12 were selected for the ML training. Almost all ML models demonstrated high AUC values, outperforming the CHA2DS2-VASc score (AUC: 0.643, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.512-0.767). The Support Vector Machine (SVM) and XGBoost models achieved the highest AUCs, with 0.874 (95% CI: 0.769-0.959) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.783-0.953), respectively. The SVM and LightGBM consistently provided significant net clinical benefits. Key features consistently identified across these models were creatinine clearance (CrCl), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and warfarin use.

Conclusions: Machine-learning models can be useful in identifying incident ischaemic strokes in patients with HFrEF but without AF. CrCl, BUN and warfarin use were the key features.

机器学习治疗射血分数降低但无心房颤动的心力衰竭患者的中风:WARCEF 试验的事后分析。
背景:预测射血分数降低(HFrEF)但无心房颤动(AF)的心力衰竭患者发生缺血性脑卒中仍是一项挑战。我们的目的是评估机器学习(ML)在识别该人群缺血性卒中发生方面的性能:我们对 WARCEF 试验进行了事后分析,仅包括无房颤病史的患者。我们使用曲线下面积(AUC)和决策曲线分析等指标评估了 9 个 ML 模型识别卒中事件的性能。根据 SAPley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)值对模型中使用的每个特征的重要性进行排序:我们纳入了 2213 名患有 HFrEF 但无房颤的患者(平均年龄为 58 ± 11 岁;80% 为男性)。在平均 3.3 ± 1.8 年的随访期间,其中 74 人(3.3%)在窦性心律时发生缺血性卒中。在 29 个患者人口统计学变量中,有 12 个被选中进行 ML 训练。几乎所有的 ML 模型都显示出较高的 AUC 值,优于 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分(AUC:0.643,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.512-0.767)。支持向量机(SVM)和 XGBoost 模型的 AUC 最高,分别为 0.874(95% CI:0.769-0.959)和 0.873(95% CI:0.783-0.953)。SVM 和 LightGBM 始终能提供显著的净临床效益。这些模型一致识别出的关键特征是肌酐清除率(CrCl)、血尿素氮(BUN)和华法林使用情况:结论:机器学习模型有助于识别高房颤但无房颤的缺血性脑卒中患者。CrCl、BUN和使用华法林是关键特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信