Comparison of Transcatheter versus Surgical Tricuspid Repair among Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation: Two-Year Results.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tomonari Shimoda, Hiroki Ueyama, Yoshihisa Miyamoto, Atsuyuki Watanabe, Hiroshi Gotanda, Dhaval Kolte, Azeem Latib, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Alan Zajarias, Sammy Elmariah, Hiroo Takayama, Yusuke Tsugawa, Toshiki Kuno
{"title":"Comparison of Transcatheter versus Surgical Tricuspid Repair among Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation: Two-Year Results.","authors":"Tomonari Shimoda, Hiroki Ueyama, Yoshihisa Miyamoto, Atsuyuki Watanabe, Hiroshi Gotanda, Dhaval Kolte, Azeem Latib, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Alan Zajarias, Sammy Elmariah, Hiroo Takayama, Yusuke Tsugawa, Toshiki Kuno","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Evidence is limited as to whether outcomes differ between patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) treated with tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) versus surgical tricuspid valve repair. We aimed to compare outcomes between these two approaches. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed the data on Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 to 99 with TR who underwent T-TEER or isolated surgical repair between July 2016 and December 2020. The primary outcome was two-year all-cause mortality. Other outcomes included in-hospital mortality and permanent pacemaker implantation as well as two-year heart failure hospitalization and tricuspid valve reintervention. A propensity score matching weight analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1,143 patients were included (409 T-TEER versus 734 surgery). The proportion of T-TEER cases increased from 2% in the third quarter of 2016 to 67% in the last quarter of 2020 among all isolated TR procedures. After adjustment for potential confounders, we found no evidence that two-year all-cause mortality differs between patients treated with T-TEER versus surgical repair (adjusted HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63-1.13). Patients treated with T-TEER experienced lower in-hospital mortality (2.5% versus 12.5%, P<0.001) and permanent pacemaker implantation rates (0.0% versus 12.7%, P<0.001) than those treated by surgical repair. At two years, we found no differences in heart failure hospitalizations, but tricuspid valve reinterventions were more frequent in the T-TEER group (subdistribution HR, 8.03; 95% CI, 2.87-22.48). <b>Conclusions:</b> Among Medicare beneficiaries with TR, two-year mortality rate was comparable between T-TEER and surgical repair. T-TEER showed advantages in perioperative outcomes, including lower in-hospital mortality and pacemaker implantation rates, while tricuspid valve reinterventions were more frequent in the T-TEER group. Further studies are necessary to refine indications, patient selections, and optimal timing for intervention with either treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014825","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence is limited as to whether outcomes differ between patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) treated with tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) versus surgical tricuspid valve repair. We aimed to compare outcomes between these two approaches. Methods: We analyzed the data on Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 to 99 with TR who underwent T-TEER or isolated surgical repair between July 2016 and December 2020. The primary outcome was two-year all-cause mortality. Other outcomes included in-hospital mortality and permanent pacemaker implantation as well as two-year heart failure hospitalization and tricuspid valve reintervention. A propensity score matching weight analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders. Results: A total of 1,143 patients were included (409 T-TEER versus 734 surgery). The proportion of T-TEER cases increased from 2% in the third quarter of 2016 to 67% in the last quarter of 2020 among all isolated TR procedures. After adjustment for potential confounders, we found no evidence that two-year all-cause mortality differs between patients treated with T-TEER versus surgical repair (adjusted HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63-1.13). Patients treated with T-TEER experienced lower in-hospital mortality (2.5% versus 12.5%, P<0.001) and permanent pacemaker implantation rates (0.0% versus 12.7%, P<0.001) than those treated by surgical repair. At two years, we found no differences in heart failure hospitalizations, but tricuspid valve reinterventions were more frequent in the T-TEER group (subdistribution HR, 8.03; 95% CI, 2.87-22.48). Conclusions: Among Medicare beneficiaries with TR, two-year mortality rate was comparable between T-TEER and surgical repair. T-TEER showed advantages in perioperative outcomes, including lower in-hospital mortality and pacemaker implantation rates, while tricuspid valve reinterventions were more frequent in the T-TEER group. Further studies are necessary to refine indications, patient selections, and optimal timing for intervention with either treatment strategy.

三尖瓣反流患者经导管三尖瓣修复术与手术三尖瓣修复术的比较:两年结果
背景:关于三尖瓣反流(TR)患者接受三尖瓣经导管边缘到边缘修补术(T-TEER)与三尖瓣手术修补术治疗的疗效是否存在差异的证据很有限。我们旨在比较这两种方法的疗效。方法:我们分析了在 2016 年 7 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受 T-TEER 或孤立手术修复的 65 岁至 99 岁三尖瓣狭窄联邦医疗保险付费服务受益人的数据。主要结果是两年全因死亡率。其他结果包括院内死亡率、永久起搏器植入、两年心衰住院和三尖瓣再介入。采用倾向评分匹配权重分析法调整潜在的混杂因素。研究结果共纳入 1143 例患者(409 例 T-TEER 对 734 例手术)。在所有孤立的TR手术中,T-TEER病例的比例从2016年第三季度的2%增至2020年第四季度的67%。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,我们发现没有证据表明接受T-TEER治疗的患者与接受手术修复的患者两年内的全因死亡率存在差异(调整后HR为0.84;95% CI为0.63-1.13)。接受T-TEER治疗的患者的院内死亡率较低(2.5%对12.5%,PConclusions.Net):在患有 TR 的医疗保险受益人中,T-TEER 和手术修复的两年死亡率相当。T-TEER在围手术期结果方面具有优势,包括较低的院内死亡率和起搏器植入率,而T-TEER组的三尖瓣再介入治疗更为频繁。有必要开展进一步研究,以完善两种治疗策略的适应症、患者选择和最佳干预时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信