{"title":"Efficacy of Percutaneous vs Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Overactive Bladder Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Tannaz Ahadi, Ismaeel Noori, Shayesteh Khalifeh Soltani, Pouya Ghaboosi, Gholam Reza Raissi","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2023.4896.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Overactive bladder (OAB) is a symptom syndrome consisting of urgency, frequency, and nocturia. It is a common urologic disorder. Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a minimally invasive, well-tolerated, and effective treatment of OAB. Recently, transcutaneous PTN stimulation (TTNS) with surface electrodes has been used, which is non-invasive. This study examines and compares the efficacy of these two therapy methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, 44 patients with OAB were randomly assigned to PTNS and TTNS groups. In both groups, the therapeutic interventions were performed thrice a week for four weeks, 12 sessions. Incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL) and OAB symptom score (OABSS) were evaluated before the intervention, then one week and four weeks after completing the sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 44 patients (41 females and 3 males), the mean age of the subjects was 51.95 years in the PTNS group and 56.86 years in the TTNS group (P=0.9). In our study, the patients' urinary symptoms and QOL improved in both groups over time. Both interventions had no significant difference (P=0.796, P=0.372, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PTNS and TTNS effectively improved patients' symptoms of OAB and their QOL. TTNS can be considered as effective as conventional PTNS and a less invasive alternative for PTNS in OAB treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8701,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"15 4","pages":"499-508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2023.4896.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a symptom syndrome consisting of urgency, frequency, and nocturia. It is a common urologic disorder. Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a minimally invasive, well-tolerated, and effective treatment of OAB. Recently, transcutaneous PTN stimulation (TTNS) with surface electrodes has been used, which is non-invasive. This study examines and compares the efficacy of these two therapy methods.
Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 44 patients with OAB were randomly assigned to PTNS and TTNS groups. In both groups, the therapeutic interventions were performed thrice a week for four weeks, 12 sessions. Incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL) and OAB symptom score (OABSS) were evaluated before the intervention, then one week and four weeks after completing the sessions.
Results: Of 44 patients (41 females and 3 males), the mean age of the subjects was 51.95 years in the PTNS group and 56.86 years in the TTNS group (P=0.9). In our study, the patients' urinary symptoms and QOL improved in both groups over time. Both interventions had no significant difference (P=0.796, P=0.372, respectively).
Conclusion: PTNS and TTNS effectively improved patients' symptoms of OAB and their QOL. TTNS can be considered as effective as conventional PTNS and a less invasive alternative for PTNS in OAB treatment.
期刊介绍:
BCN is an international multidisciplinary journal that publishes editorials, original full-length research articles, short communications, reviews, methodological papers, commentaries, perspectives and “news and reports” in the broad fields of developmental, molecular, cellular, system, computational, behavioral, cognitive, and clinical neuroscience. No area in the neural related sciences is excluded from consideration, although priority is given to studies that provide applied insights into the functioning of the nervous system. BCN aims to advance our understanding of organization and function of the nervous system in health and disease, thereby improving the diagnosis and treatment of neural-related disorders. Manuscripts submitted to BCN should describe novel results generated by experiments that were guided by clearly defined aims or hypotheses. BCN aims to provide serious ties in interdisciplinary communication, accessibility to a broad readership inside Iran and the region and also in all other international academic sites, effective peer review process, and independence from all possible non-scientific interests. BCN also tries to empower national, regional and international collaborative networks in the field of neuroscience in Iran, Middle East, Central Asia and North Africa and to be the voice of the Iranian and regional neuroscience community in the world of neuroscientists. In this way, the journal encourages submission of editorials, review papers, commentaries, methodological notes and perspectives that address this scope.