Lu Chen, Yiping Sun, Weijie Liu, Jie Ye, Xiaozhou Hu, Wei Rao, Jiayi Zhang, Mengyuan Gao, Wencan Wu, Yunhai Tu
{"title":"One-Stage Orbital Decompression Combined with Intraoperative Muscle Relaxation for TAO: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Lu Chen, Yiping Sun, Weijie Liu, Jie Ye, Xiaozhou Hu, Wei Rao, Jiayi Zhang, Mengyuan Gao, Wencan Wu, Yunhai Tu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To gauge the efficacy and safety of performing a one-stage endoscopic orbital decompression procedure combined with the intraoperative relaxed medial rectus muscle (MR) positioning technique as a means of treating esotropia associated with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>38 TAO patients fulfilled the study requirements. The patients in Group A (n=19; mean age 52.32 ± 9.90 years; 12 males, 7 females) underwent a one-stage surgical procedure, whereas the patients in Group B (n=19; mean age 52.53 ± 8.49 years; 9 males, 10 females) underwent staged surgery. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field mean deviation (MD), Hertel exophthalmometry, intraocular pressure (IOP), deviation, ocular motility, and diplopia were compared between these two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the patients in Group A, 8 (42.11%) underwent unilateral orbital decompression and 11 underwent bilateral decompression, while all 19 patients in Group B underwent bilateral decompression. Both groups exhibited significant improvements in postoperative BCVA (Group A 0.09 ± 0.15 logMAR, Group B 0.04 ± 0.08 logMAR), MD of visual field (Group A -2.73 ± 3.36 dB, Group B -1.82 ± 3.75 dB), proptosis (Group A 16.23 ± 2.58mm, Group B 17.04 ± 2.70mm), and IOP (Group A 16.23 ± 4.49mmHg, Group B 17.24 ± 4.14mmHg) when comparing postoperative values to preoperative levels, while there were no significant differences between these groups. In each group, 8 patients (42.11%) underwent surgical procedures targeting one single MR, whereas the remaining 11 in each group underwent surgery on two MRs. The respective primary motor and sensory success rates in Group A were 68.40% (13/19) and 78.95% (15/19), whereas those in Group B were 73.70% (14/19) and 84.21% (16/19), with no significant differences between these groups in terms of postoperative residual strabismus, stereoscopic vision improvements, or success rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results demonstrate that a one-stage surgical procedure can simultaneously alleviate proptosis and diplopia while achieving outcomes comparable to those achieved through staged surgery. This treatment strategy can thus provide patients with greater therapeutic convenience, decreasing the overall number of surgical procedures and their attendant risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.11.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To gauge the efficacy and safety of performing a one-stage endoscopic orbital decompression procedure combined with the intraoperative relaxed medial rectus muscle (MR) positioning technique as a means of treating esotropia associated with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO).
Setting: Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University.
Methods: 38 TAO patients fulfilled the study requirements. The patients in Group A (n=19; mean age 52.32 ± 9.90 years; 12 males, 7 females) underwent a one-stage surgical procedure, whereas the patients in Group B (n=19; mean age 52.53 ± 8.49 years; 9 males, 10 females) underwent staged surgery. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field mean deviation (MD), Hertel exophthalmometry, intraocular pressure (IOP), deviation, ocular motility, and diplopia were compared between these two groups.
Results: Of the patients in Group A, 8 (42.11%) underwent unilateral orbital decompression and 11 underwent bilateral decompression, while all 19 patients in Group B underwent bilateral decompression. Both groups exhibited significant improvements in postoperative BCVA (Group A 0.09 ± 0.15 logMAR, Group B 0.04 ± 0.08 logMAR), MD of visual field (Group A -2.73 ± 3.36 dB, Group B -1.82 ± 3.75 dB), proptosis (Group A 16.23 ± 2.58mm, Group B 17.04 ± 2.70mm), and IOP (Group A 16.23 ± 4.49mmHg, Group B 17.24 ± 4.14mmHg) when comparing postoperative values to preoperative levels, while there were no significant differences between these groups. In each group, 8 patients (42.11%) underwent surgical procedures targeting one single MR, whereas the remaining 11 in each group underwent surgery on two MRs. The respective primary motor and sensory success rates in Group A were 68.40% (13/19) and 78.95% (15/19), whereas those in Group B were 73.70% (14/19) and 84.21% (16/19), with no significant differences between these groups in terms of postoperative residual strabismus, stereoscopic vision improvements, or success rates.
Conclusion: These results demonstrate that a one-stage surgical procedure can simultaneously alleviate proptosis and diplopia while achieving outcomes comparable to those achieved through staged surgery. This treatment strategy can thus provide patients with greater therapeutic convenience, decreasing the overall number of surgical procedures and their attendant risks.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.