Functional Redundancy Enables a Simplified Consortium to Match the Lignocellulose Degradation Capacity of the Original Consortium.

IF 7.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yan Pang, Jingjing Wang, Shijia Dai, Wanyi Zhang, Xinyuan Wang, Xiaoxia Zhang, Zhiyong Huang
{"title":"Functional Redundancy Enables a Simplified Consortium to Match the Lignocellulose Degradation Capacity of the Original Consortium.","authors":"Yan Pang, Jingjing Wang, Shijia Dai, Wanyi Zhang, Xinyuan Wang, Xiaoxia Zhang, Zhiyong Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.envres.2024.120373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between structure and function in microbial communities is intriguing and complex. In this study, we used single-carbon source domestication to derive consortium YL from the straw-degrading consortium Y. Y and YL exhibited similar straw degradation capabilities, yet YL harbored only half the species diversity of Y, with distinct dominant species. The most enriched microorganisms in Y were Ureibacillus, Acetanaerobacterium, and Hungateiclostridiaceae, whereas Bacillaceae, Bacillus, and Peptostreptococcales-Tissierellales were most enriched in YL. In-depth analysis revealed that Y and YL had comparable abundances of core lignocellulose-degrading genes, as validated by lignocellulolytic enzyme activity assays. However, the number of species harboring these key lignocellulose-degrading genes (K01179, K01181, K00432) in YL was reduced by over 50%, suggesting that functional redundancy enabled YL to maintain similar degradation capabilities to Y despite reduced diversity. Further analyses of key degradative species and co-occurrence networks highlighted the critical functional roles of dominant degradative species within these communities. An analysis of the overall functional pathways in the two microbial consortia revealed distinct metabolic characteristics between them. Pathways such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation and fluorobenzoate degradation were down-regulated in YL compared to Y, a finding corroborated by the metabolomic data. These results suggest a coupling between community structure and functional capacities within these microbial consortia. Overall, our findings deepen our understanding of the structure-function relationship in microbial communities and provide valuable insights for the design of lignocellulose-degrading consortia.</p>","PeriodicalId":312,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research","volume":" ","pages":"120373"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.120373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between structure and function in microbial communities is intriguing and complex. In this study, we used single-carbon source domestication to derive consortium YL from the straw-degrading consortium Y. Y and YL exhibited similar straw degradation capabilities, yet YL harbored only half the species diversity of Y, with distinct dominant species. The most enriched microorganisms in Y were Ureibacillus, Acetanaerobacterium, and Hungateiclostridiaceae, whereas Bacillaceae, Bacillus, and Peptostreptococcales-Tissierellales were most enriched in YL. In-depth analysis revealed that Y and YL had comparable abundances of core lignocellulose-degrading genes, as validated by lignocellulolytic enzyme activity assays. However, the number of species harboring these key lignocellulose-degrading genes (K01179, K01181, K00432) in YL was reduced by over 50%, suggesting that functional redundancy enabled YL to maintain similar degradation capabilities to Y despite reduced diversity. Further analyses of key degradative species and co-occurrence networks highlighted the critical functional roles of dominant degradative species within these communities. An analysis of the overall functional pathways in the two microbial consortia revealed distinct metabolic characteristics between them. Pathways such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation and fluorobenzoate degradation were down-regulated in YL compared to Y, a finding corroborated by the metabolomic data. These results suggest a coupling between community structure and functional capacities within these microbial consortia. Overall, our findings deepen our understanding of the structure-function relationship in microbial communities and provide valuable insights for the design of lignocellulose-degrading consortia.

功能冗余使简化联合体能够与原联合体的木质纤维素降解能力相匹配。
微生物群落的结构与功能之间的关系既复杂又有趣。在本研究中,我们利用单碳源驯化技术从秸秆降解菌群 Y 中衍生出了菌群 YL。Y 和 YL 具有相似的秸秆降解能力,但 YL 的物种多样性仅为 Y 的一半,且优势物种各不相同。Y 中最富集的微生物是 Ureibacillus、Acetanaerobacterium 和 Hungateiclostridiaceae,而 YL 中最富集的微生物是 Bacillaceae、Bacillus 和 Peptostreptococcales-Tissierellales。深入分析发现,Y 和 YL 中木质纤维素降解核心基因的丰度相当,木质纤维素分解酶活性测定也验证了这一点。然而,YL中携带这些关键木质纤维素降解基因(K01179、K01181、K00432)的物种数量减少了50%以上,这表明尽管多样性减少,但功能冗余使YL能够保持与Y相似的降解能力。对关键降解物种和共生网络的进一步分析强调了优势降解物种在这些群落中的关键功能作用。对两个微生物群落整体功能途径的分析表明,它们之间的代谢特征截然不同。与 Y 群落相比,YL 群落中多环芳烃降解和氟苯甲酸酯降解等途径的调控水平较低,代谢组数据也证实了这一结果。这些结果表明,在这些微生物群落中,群落结构与功能能力之间存在耦合关系。总之,我们的研究结果加深了我们对微生物群落结构-功能关系的理解,并为木质纤维素降解联合体的设计提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Research
Environmental Research 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
8.40%
发文量
2480
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The Environmental Research journal presents a broad range of interdisciplinary research, focused on addressing worldwide environmental concerns and featuring innovative findings. Our publication strives to explore relevant anthropogenic issues across various environmental sectors, showcasing practical applications in real-life settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信