Single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Konstantinos Kossenas, Dimitrios Kalomoiris, Filippos Georgopoulos
{"title":"Single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Konstantinos Kossenas, Dimitrios Kalomoiris, Filippos Georgopoulos","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02167-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have compared single-port robotic cholecystectomy (SPRC) to single-incision laparoscopic (SILC). However, there is not a systematic review and meta-analysis in patient with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> even though higher BMI is a risk factor for gallstone disease, a common indication for cholecystectomy. PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched for related literature. Studies and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Inverse variances weighted mean differences (WMD) with random effects model were used for continues values and odds ratios (OR) with random effects model using the Mantel-Haenszel's formula were used for dichotomous value. Heterogeneity using Higgins I<sup>2</sup> and p values were calculated. Sensitivity analysis was performed for operative duration and intraoperative complications. In this meta-analysis, six studies involving a total of 734 patients examined SPRC and SILC. The analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in operative duration for SPRC compared to SILC, with a weighted mean difference of 26.67 min (95% CI 14.99, 38.34; I<sup>2</sup> = 93%; P<sub>heterogeneity</sub> < 0.00001; P<sub>overall</sub> < 0.00001). Regarding conversion to multi-port cholecystectomy (MC), no statistically significant difference was found, yielding an odds ratio of 0.94 (95% CI 0.36, 2.45; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; P<sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.78; P<sub>overall</sub> = 0.89). Intra-operative blood loss showed non-significant differences, with a weighted mean difference of - 16.76 ml (95% CI - 48.56, 15.03; I<sup>2</sup> = 78%; P<sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.03; P<sub>overall</sub> = 0.30). Length of hospitalization was significantly reduced by approximately half a day for SPRC compared to SILC, with a weighted mean difference of - 0.52 days (95% CI - 0.89, - 0.14; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; P<sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.52; P<sub>overall</sub> = 0.007). Intra-operative complications did not differ significantly between the techniques, resulting in an odds ratio of 0.59 (95% CI 0.19, 1.81; I<sup>2</sup> = 70%; P<sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.04; P<sub>overall</sub> = 0.36). Finally, two studies evaluated bile leak rates, concluding no significant difference with an odds ratio of 0.86 (95% CI 0.39, 1.88; I<sup>2</sup> = 23%; P<sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.25; P<sub>overall</sub> = 0.70). Sensitivity analyses indicated that no single study unduly influenced the results for operative duration, while one study was identified as a source of heterogeneity in intra-operative complications. SPRC is associated with longer operative duration, but shorter length of hospitalization in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, compared to laparoscopic. Future studies should aim to examine incisional hernias rates as well as determine the long-term outcomes. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024602514.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02167-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have compared single-port robotic cholecystectomy (SPRC) to single-incision laparoscopic (SILC). However, there is not a systematic review and meta-analysis in patient with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 even though higher BMI is a risk factor for gallstone disease, a common indication for cholecystectomy. PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched for related literature. Studies and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Inverse variances weighted mean differences (WMD) with random effects model were used for continues values and odds ratios (OR) with random effects model using the Mantel-Haenszel's formula were used for dichotomous value. Heterogeneity using Higgins I2 and p values were calculated. Sensitivity analysis was performed for operative duration and intraoperative complications. In this meta-analysis, six studies involving a total of 734 patients examined SPRC and SILC. The analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in operative duration for SPRC compared to SILC, with a weighted mean difference of 26.67 min (95% CI 14.99, 38.34; I2 = 93%; Pheterogeneity < 0.00001; Poverall < 0.00001). Regarding conversion to multi-port cholecystectomy (MC), no statistically significant difference was found, yielding an odds ratio of 0.94 (95% CI 0.36, 2.45; I2 = 0%; Pheterogeneity = 0.78; Poverall = 0.89). Intra-operative blood loss showed non-significant differences, with a weighted mean difference of - 16.76 ml (95% CI - 48.56, 15.03; I2 = 78%; Pheterogeneity = 0.03; Poverall = 0.30). Length of hospitalization was significantly reduced by approximately half a day for SPRC compared to SILC, with a weighted mean difference of - 0.52 days (95% CI - 0.89, - 0.14; I2 = 0%; Pheterogeneity = 0.52; Poverall = 0.007). Intra-operative complications did not differ significantly between the techniques, resulting in an odds ratio of 0.59 (95% CI 0.19, 1.81; I2 = 70%; Pheterogeneity = 0.04; Poverall = 0.36). Finally, two studies evaluated bile leak rates, concluding no significant difference with an odds ratio of 0.86 (95% CI 0.39, 1.88; I2 = 23%; Pheterogeneity = 0.25; Poverall = 0.70). Sensitivity analyses indicated that no single study unduly influenced the results for operative duration, while one study was identified as a source of heterogeneity in intra-operative complications. SPRC is associated with longer operative duration, but shorter length of hospitalization in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, compared to laparoscopic. Future studies should aim to examine incisional hernias rates as well as determine the long-term outcomes. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024602514.

单孔机器人与单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术在体重指数≥ 25 kg/m2患者中的应用:系统综述和荟萃分析。
以往的研究对单孔机器人胆囊切除术(SPRC)和单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)进行了比较。然而,尽管较高的体重指数是胆石症的风险因素,而胆石症是胆囊切除术的常见适应症,但目前还没有针对体重指数≥25 kg/m2患者的系统性综述和荟萃分析。检索了 PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆的相关文献。由两名独立审稿人对研究和数据进行提取。对于持续值,采用随机效应模型的逆方差加权均差(WMD);对于二分值,采用曼特尔-海恩泽尔公式的随机效应模型的几率比(OR)。使用希金斯 I2 和 p 值计算异质性。对手术时间和术中并发症进行了敏感性分析。在这项荟萃分析中,涉及 734 名患者的六项研究对 SPRC 和 SILC 进行了研究。分析结果显示,SPRC 的手术时间比 SILC 有显著的统计学差异,加权平均差异为 26.67 分钟(95% CI 14.99,38.34;I2 = 93%;Pheterogeneity overall 2 = 0%;Pheterogeneity = 0.78;Poverall = 0.89)。术中失血量差异不显著,加权平均差异为-16.76毫升(95% CI - 48.56, 15.03;I2 = 78%;Pheterogeneity = 0.03;Poverall = 0.30)。与SILC相比,SPRC的住院时间明显缩短了约半天,加权平均差异为-0.52天(95% CI - 0.89, - 0.14;I2 = 0%;Pheterogeneity = 0.52;Poverall = 0.007)。不同技术的术中并发症差异不大,几率比为 0.59 (95% CI 0.19, 1.81; I2 = 70%; Pheterogeneity = 0.04; Poverall = 0.36)。最后,两项研究对胆漏率进行了评估,得出的结论是无显著差异,几率为 0.86(95% CI 0.39,1.88;I2 = 23%;Pheterogeneity = 0.25;Poverall = 0.70)。敏感性分析表明,没有一项研究对手术持续时间的结果产生不当影响,但有一项研究被认为是术中并发症的异质性来源。与腹腔镜相比,SPRC的手术时间更长,但BMI≥25 kg/m2患者的住院时间更短。今后的研究应着眼于检查切口疝的发生率,并确定长期疗效。PROSPERO 注册:CRD42024602514。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信