Live and learn: Utilizing MyDispense to increase student knowledge and confidence in caring for patients with diverse religious backgrounds

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
William E. Norton Jr , Clark D. Kebodeaux , Adam Phillips , Krista L. Donohoe , Lauren M. Caldas
{"title":"Live and learn: Utilizing MyDispense to increase student knowledge and confidence in caring for patients with diverse religious backgrounds","authors":"William E. Norton Jr ,&nbsp;Clark D. Kebodeaux ,&nbsp;Adam Phillips ,&nbsp;Krista L. Donohoe ,&nbsp;Lauren M. Caldas","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The American Council for Pharmacy Education outlines that pharmacists should be able to “recognize social determinants of health to diminish disparities and inequities in access to quality care.” This randomized, cross-sectional study assessed students' knowledge and confidence in caring for patients with diverse religious backgrounds. Students were assigned to either a series of religious cases created in MyDispense or a control group to read a pamphlet on religious considerations in patient care.</div></div><div><h3>Impact</h3><div>First-year pharmacy students, 44 of 82 (response rate 53.7 %), consented to participate in an optional study, and were randomized to complete one of two religious educational interventions: an interactive simulation activity delivered via MyDispense (<em>n</em> = 23) or the control group of reading an educational pamphlet (<em>n</em> = 21). Both the MyDispense simulation and the control group improved pre- and post-assessment knowledge-based questions and confidence to achieve the three learning objectives.</div></div><div><h3>Recommendations</h3><div>There were three significant limitations to this study. The first was the use of a control group that limited the sample sizes making it difficult to show meaningful changes. The second that students had limited experience with the MyDispense platform making the ease of completing the active-learning religious simulations confounded by also learning the dispensing system. Finally, control group students utilized the pamphlet during the post-assessment, which was not the intention of the study design and significantly limited the ability to identify changes within and between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Future studies will need to use alternative study design methods to determine how religious cultural sensitivity may best be incorporated into the pharmacy curriculum.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 102232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724002648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The American Council for Pharmacy Education outlines that pharmacists should be able to “recognize social determinants of health to diminish disparities and inequities in access to quality care.” This randomized, cross-sectional study assessed students' knowledge and confidence in caring for patients with diverse religious backgrounds. Students were assigned to either a series of religious cases created in MyDispense or a control group to read a pamphlet on religious considerations in patient care.

Impact

First-year pharmacy students, 44 of 82 (response rate 53.7 %), consented to participate in an optional study, and were randomized to complete one of two religious educational interventions: an interactive simulation activity delivered via MyDispense (n = 23) or the control group of reading an educational pamphlet (n = 21). Both the MyDispense simulation and the control group improved pre- and post-assessment knowledge-based questions and confidence to achieve the three learning objectives.

Recommendations

There were three significant limitations to this study. The first was the use of a control group that limited the sample sizes making it difficult to show meaningful changes. The second that students had limited experience with the MyDispense platform making the ease of completing the active-learning religious simulations confounded by also learning the dispensing system. Finally, control group students utilized the pamphlet during the post-assessment, which was not the intention of the study design and significantly limited the ability to identify changes within and between the groups.

Discussion

Future studies will need to use alternative study design methods to determine how religious cultural sensitivity may best be incorporated into the pharmacy curriculum.
活到老,学到老:利用 MyDispense 增加学生在护理具有不同宗教背景的病人方面的知识和信心。
背景:美国药学教育委员会(American Council for Pharmacy Education)规定,药剂师应能够 "认识到健康的社会决定因素,以减少在获得优质护理方面存在的差距和不公平"。这项随机横断面研究评估了学生在护理具有不同宗教背景的患者方面的知识和信心。学生们被分配到 "我的配药"(MyDispense)中创建的一系列宗教案例或对照组中,阅读有关病人护理中宗教因素的小册子:82 名药剂学一年级学生中有 44 名(回复率为 53.7%)同意参加这项自选研究,他们被随机分配完成两种宗教教育干预措施中的一种:通过 MyDispense 开展互动模拟活动(n = 23)或阅读教育小册子的对照组(n = 21)。MyDispense 模拟活动组和对照组都在评估前后提高了基于知识的问题和实现三个学习目标的信心:本研究存在三个重大局限。首先是对照组的使用限制了样本量,因此很难显示有意义的变化。其次,学生对 MyDispense 平台的使用经验有限,这使得他们在轻松完成主动学习宗教模拟的同时,还要学习配药系统。最后,对照组学生在后评估中使用了小册子,这不是研究设计的初衷,也大大限制了识别组内和组间变化的能力:讨论:未来的研究需要使用其他研究设计方法,以确定如何将宗教文化敏感性最好地纳入药剂学课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信