Workplace-based prevention and management of knee pain: a systematic review.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sebastian Venge Skovlund, Mark Skovbye Eg Østergaard, Karina G V Seeberg, Charlotte Suetta, Per Aagaard, Lars Louis Andersen, Emil Sundstrup
{"title":"Workplace-based prevention and management of knee pain: a systematic review.","authors":"Sebastian Venge Skovlund, Mark Skovbye Eg Østergaard, Karina G V Seeberg, Charlotte Suetta, Per Aagaard, Lars Louis Andersen, Emil Sundstrup","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Knee pain is highly prevalent and disabling among the general and working population. This systematic review explored the effectiveness of workplace-based interventions on knee pain among workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PICO-guided systematic search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection for articles published from 2003 until January 2023. Eligible articles included randomized and non-randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of workplace-based interventions on knee pain among currently employed adult workers. The quality assessment and evidence synthesis adhered to the systematic review approach, which the Institute for Work & Health developed, and was focused on developing practical recommendations for stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 13 identified studies, 11 medium- and high-quality studies were entered into the evidence synthesis. Importantly, none of the included studies specifically aimed at reducing of knee pain. Still, among the included studies, a strong level of evidence suggested no benefit of workplace-based physical exercise/activity intervention on knee pain. The level of evidence was deemed too uncertain to guide current policy/practices for ergonomic and multifaceted interventions. No intervention types were associated with negative effects on knee pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current evidence-base pertaining to workplace-based prevention and management of knee pain is insufficient to guide effective preventive workplace practice or policy development. Considering the global prevalence and health impact of knee pain, development and implementation of effective workplace interventions aimed at prevention and management of knee pain is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Knee pain is highly prevalent and disabling among the general and working population. This systematic review explored the effectiveness of workplace-based interventions on knee pain among workers.

Methods: A PICO-guided systematic search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection for articles published from 2003 until January 2023. Eligible articles included randomized and non-randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of workplace-based interventions on knee pain among currently employed adult workers. The quality assessment and evidence synthesis adhered to the systematic review approach, which the Institute for Work & Health developed, and was focused on developing practical recommendations for stakeholders.

Results: Of the 13 identified studies, 11 medium- and high-quality studies were entered into the evidence synthesis. Importantly, none of the included studies specifically aimed at reducing of knee pain. Still, among the included studies, a strong level of evidence suggested no benefit of workplace-based physical exercise/activity intervention on knee pain. The level of evidence was deemed too uncertain to guide current policy/practices for ergonomic and multifaceted interventions. No intervention types were associated with negative effects on knee pain.

Conclusions: The current evidence-base pertaining to workplace-based prevention and management of knee pain is insufficient to guide effective preventive workplace practice or policy development. Considering the global prevalence and health impact of knee pain, development and implementation of effective workplace interventions aimed at prevention and management of knee pain is needed.

基于工作场所的膝关节疼痛预防和管理:系统性综述。
目的:膝关节疼痛在普通人群和工作人群中发病率很高,而且会致残。本系统综述探讨了基于工作场所的干预措施对工人膝关节疼痛的有效性:在 PICO 的指导下,在 PubMed 和 Web of Science 核心数据库中对 2003 年至 2023 年 1 月期间发表的文章进行了系统检索。符合条件的文章包括随机和非随机对照试验,这些试验评估了基于工作场所的干预措施对目前就业的成年工人膝关节疼痛的影响。质量评估和证据综述遵循了工作与健康研究所制定的系统综述方法,重点是为利益相关者制定切实可行的建议:在已确定的 13 项研究中,有 11 项中高级研究被纳入证据综合。重要的是,所纳入的研究中没有一项是专门针对减轻膝关节疼痛的。此外,在纳入的研究中,有大量证据表明,基于工作场所的体育锻炼/活动干预对膝关节疼痛没有益处。证据水平被认为过于不确定,无法指导人体工程学和多方面干预的现行政策/实践。没有任何干预类型对膝关节疼痛有负面影响:目前有关工作场所膝关节疼痛预防和管理的证据不足以指导有效的工作场所预防实践或政策制定。考虑到膝关节疼痛在全球的发病率和对健康的影响,需要制定和实施有效的工作场所干预措施,以预防和管理膝关节疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信