Sebastian Venge Skovlund, Mark Skovbye Eg Østergaard, Karina G V Seeberg, Charlotte Suetta, Per Aagaard, Lars Louis Andersen, Emil Sundstrup
{"title":"Workplace-based prevention and management of knee pain: a systematic review.","authors":"Sebastian Venge Skovlund, Mark Skovbye Eg Østergaard, Karina G V Seeberg, Charlotte Suetta, Per Aagaard, Lars Louis Andersen, Emil Sundstrup","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Knee pain is highly prevalent and disabling among the general and working population. This systematic review explored the effectiveness of workplace-based interventions on knee pain among workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PICO-guided systematic search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection for articles published from 2003 until January 2023. Eligible articles included randomized and non-randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of workplace-based interventions on knee pain among currently employed adult workers. The quality assessment and evidence synthesis adhered to the systematic review approach, which the Institute for Work & Health developed, and was focused on developing practical recommendations for stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 13 identified studies, 11 medium- and high-quality studies were entered into the evidence synthesis. Importantly, none of the included studies specifically aimed at reducing of knee pain. Still, among the included studies, a strong level of evidence suggested no benefit of workplace-based physical exercise/activity intervention on knee pain. The level of evidence was deemed too uncertain to guide current policy/practices for ergonomic and multifaceted interventions. No intervention types were associated with negative effects on knee pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current evidence-base pertaining to workplace-based prevention and management of knee pain is insufficient to guide effective preventive workplace practice or policy development. Considering the global prevalence and health impact of knee pain, development and implementation of effective workplace interventions aimed at prevention and management of knee pain is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Knee pain is highly prevalent and disabling among the general and working population. This systematic review explored the effectiveness of workplace-based interventions on knee pain among workers.
Methods: A PICO-guided systematic search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection for articles published from 2003 until January 2023. Eligible articles included randomized and non-randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of workplace-based interventions on knee pain among currently employed adult workers. The quality assessment and evidence synthesis adhered to the systematic review approach, which the Institute for Work & Health developed, and was focused on developing practical recommendations for stakeholders.
Results: Of the 13 identified studies, 11 medium- and high-quality studies were entered into the evidence synthesis. Importantly, none of the included studies specifically aimed at reducing of knee pain. Still, among the included studies, a strong level of evidence suggested no benefit of workplace-based physical exercise/activity intervention on knee pain. The level of evidence was deemed too uncertain to guide current policy/practices for ergonomic and multifaceted interventions. No intervention types were associated with negative effects on knee pain.
Conclusions: The current evidence-base pertaining to workplace-based prevention and management of knee pain is insufficient to guide effective preventive workplace practice or policy development. Considering the global prevalence and health impact of knee pain, development and implementation of effective workplace interventions aimed at prevention and management of knee pain is needed.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).