Sex disparities in myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Elma J Peters, Sanne Ten Berg, Margriet Bogerd, Annemarie E Engström, Wim K Lagrand, Marijke J C Timmermans, Luuk C Otterspoor, Krischan D Sjauw, Niels J W Verouden, Alexander P J Vlaar, José P S Henriques
{"title":"Sex disparities in myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.","authors":"Elma J Peters, Sanne Ten Berg, Margriet Bogerd, Annemarie E Engström, Wim K Lagrand, Marijke J C Timmermans, Luuk C Otterspoor, Krischan D Sjauw, Niels J W Verouden, Alexander P J Vlaar, José P S Henriques","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women are underrepresented In cardiovascular disease research, constituting only 30 % of the cardiogenic shock (CS) population. Consequently, guidelines are mainly based on male patients. This study aims to comprehensively examine the sex-specific aspects of acute myocardial infarction (AMI)-related CS, encompassing presentation, treatment and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with CS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2017 and 2021 were identified using the national Netherlands Heart Registration. Mortality was assessed using the Kaplan Meier method, and logistic regression was performed to investigate differences in clinical management between sexes. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2274 patients, 614 (27 %) were female. Women were older (70 vs. 66 years, p < 0.001) and presented with longer symptom duration (> 3 h: 52 % vs. 37 %, p < 0.001). Men more often presented with multivessel disease (62 % vs. 56 %, p < 0.001), a prior myocardial infarction (23 % vs. 15 %, p < 0.001) and after an OHCA (46 % vs. 29 %, p < 0.001). A trend towards more usage of mechanical circulatory support in men was observed (adjusted OR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.67-1.09). Mortality, both adjusted and unadjusted, was not statistically different for men and women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with CS present with distinct clinical characteristics, including longer symptom duration, underscoring the importance of symptom recognition. Furthermore, men present at younger age and with more OHCA. Mortality in men and women was similar despite differences in presentation and clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132730","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women are underrepresented In cardiovascular disease research, constituting only 30 % of the cardiogenic shock (CS) population. Consequently, guidelines are mainly based on male patients. This study aims to comprehensively examine the sex-specific aspects of acute myocardial infarction (AMI)-related CS, encompassing presentation, treatment and outcomes.

Methods: Patients with CS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2017 and 2021 were identified using the national Netherlands Heart Registration. Mortality was assessed using the Kaplan Meier method, and logistic regression was performed to investigate differences in clinical management between sexes. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) was conducted.

Results: Among 2274 patients, 614 (27 %) were female. Women were older (70 vs. 66 years, p < 0.001) and presented with longer symptom duration (> 3 h: 52 % vs. 37 %, p < 0.001). Men more often presented with multivessel disease (62 % vs. 56 %, p < 0.001), a prior myocardial infarction (23 % vs. 15 %, p < 0.001) and after an OHCA (46 % vs. 29 %, p < 0.001). A trend towards more usage of mechanical circulatory support in men was observed (adjusted OR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.67-1.09). Mortality, both adjusted and unadjusted, was not statistically different for men and women.

Conclusion: Women with CS present with distinct clinical characteristics, including longer symptom duration, underscoring the importance of symptom recognition. Furthermore, men present at younger age and with more OHCA. Mortality in men and women was similar despite differences in presentation and clinical management.

与心肌梗死相关的心源性休克的性别差异。
背景:女性在心血管疾病研究中的代表性不足,在心源性休克(CS)患者中仅占 30%。因此,指南主要以男性患者为基础。本研究旨在全面考察急性心肌梗死(AMI)相关心源性休克的性别特异性,包括表现、治疗和结果:通过荷兰全国心脏登记,对2017年至2021年间接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的CS患者进行识别。采用卡普兰-梅耶尔法评估死亡率,并进行逻辑回归以研究不同性别在临床管理方面的差异。此外,还进行了一项敏感性分析,排除了院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者:在 2274 名患者中,有 614 名女性(占 27%)。女性年龄更大(70 岁对 66 岁,p 3 h:52% 对 37%,P 结论:女性 CS 患者具有独特的临床特征:女性 CS 患者有明显的临床特征,包括症状持续时间较长,这突出了症状识别的重要性。此外,男性发病年龄更小,发生 OHCA 的几率更高。尽管表现和临床治疗方法不同,但男性和女性的死亡率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信