Equivalent Pain and Opioid Use Between Transabdominal and Retroperitoneal Adrenalectomy

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Lauren Haskins DO, MBA , Nicole Tobin MD , Elle Reineman , Rebecca Sippel MD , David Schneider MD , Kristin Long MD, MPH , Dawn Elfenbein MD , Courtney Balentine MD , Alexander Chiu MD, MPH
{"title":"Equivalent Pain and Opioid Use Between Transabdominal and Retroperitoneal Adrenalectomy","authors":"Lauren Haskins DO, MBA ,&nbsp;Nicole Tobin MD ,&nbsp;Elle Reineman ,&nbsp;Rebecca Sippel MD ,&nbsp;David Schneider MD ,&nbsp;Kristin Long MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Dawn Elfenbein MD ,&nbsp;Courtney Balentine MD ,&nbsp;Alexander Chiu MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy (LTA) and posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) are safe, effective surgical approaches. A direct comparison of postoperative pain and narcotic use is needed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adults who had laparoscopic adrenalectomy at a tertiary institution from 2015 to 2021 were identified from a surgical database. Evaluated key outcomes included opioid use and patient-reported pain during the perioperative period, which were analyzed by surgical approach and compared using multivariate linear regression. Additional data on pain postdischarge, prescription refills, length of stay, and 30-d readmission were also collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-eight (69.3%) surgeries were LTA and 39 (30.7%) were PRA. The studied patient population was 58% female and had an average age of 54 (standard deviation 13). Adrenal tumors were 75% functional and 3.4 cm on average (standard deviation 2.6). Postoperative pain scores at rest (4.4 LTA <em>versus</em> 4.5 PRA, <em>P</em> = 0.87) and activity (4.7 LTA <em>versus</em> 5.6 PRA, <em>P</em> = 0.08) did not reach statistical significance. Patients undergoing LTA used a median of 110.3 morphine milligram equivalents (interquartile range 70.1-144.5) of opioids during their hospital stay compared to 91.0 (interquartile range 59.1-133.3) for PRA (<em>P</em> = 0.16). Linear regression demonstrated no significant difference in postoperative opioid use between approaches (−9.3 morphine milligram equivalents [95% confidence interval −40.7 to 22.1]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our analysis found no significant advantage of PRA over LTA in terms of postoperative pain or opioid use, contrary to earlier findings by Barczyński <em>et al.</em>, who reported lower postoperative pain with PRA. Both approaches show similar clinical outcomes, and the choice between them should be based on individual patient factors rather than differences in patient-reported pain and opioid usage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"304 ","pages":"Pages 173-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424006619","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy (LTA) and posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) are safe, effective surgical approaches. A direct comparison of postoperative pain and narcotic use is needed.

Methods

Adults who had laparoscopic adrenalectomy at a tertiary institution from 2015 to 2021 were identified from a surgical database. Evaluated key outcomes included opioid use and patient-reported pain during the perioperative period, which were analyzed by surgical approach and compared using multivariate linear regression. Additional data on pain postdischarge, prescription refills, length of stay, and 30-d readmission were also collected.

Results

Eighty-eight (69.3%) surgeries were LTA and 39 (30.7%) were PRA. The studied patient population was 58% female and had an average age of 54 (standard deviation 13). Adrenal tumors were 75% functional and 3.4 cm on average (standard deviation 2.6). Postoperative pain scores at rest (4.4 LTA versus 4.5 PRA, P = 0.87) and activity (4.7 LTA versus 5.6 PRA, P = 0.08) did not reach statistical significance. Patients undergoing LTA used a median of 110.3 morphine milligram equivalents (interquartile range 70.1-144.5) of opioids during their hospital stay compared to 91.0 (interquartile range 59.1-133.3) for PRA (P = 0.16). Linear regression demonstrated no significant difference in postoperative opioid use between approaches (−9.3 morphine milligram equivalents [95% confidence interval −40.7 to 22.1]).

Conclusions

Our analysis found no significant advantage of PRA over LTA in terms of postoperative pain or opioid use, contrary to earlier findings by Barczyński et al., who reported lower postoperative pain with PRA. Both approaches show similar clinical outcomes, and the choice between them should be based on individual patient factors rather than differences in patient-reported pain and opioid usage.
经腹肾上腺切除术和腹膜后肾上腺切除术的疼痛和阿片类药物使用量相当。
简介:腹腔镜经腹肾上腺切除术(LTA)和后腹膜后肾上腺切除术(PRA)是安全、有效的手术方法。需要对术后疼痛和麻醉剂使用情况进行直接比较:方法:从手术数据库中筛选出 2015 年至 2021 年期间在一家三级医院接受腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的成年人。评估的主要结果包括围手术期阿片类药物的使用情况和患者报告的疼痛情况,这些结果按手术方式进行分析,并使用多变量线性回归进行比较。此外,还收集了出院后疼痛、处方续订、住院时间和 30 天再入院的其他数据:88例(69.3%)手术为LTA,39例(30.7%)为PRA。研究对象中58%为女性,平均年龄54岁(标准偏差13)。功能性肾上腺肿瘤占 75%,平均 3.4 厘米(标准差 2.6)。术后休息时(4.4 LTA 对 4.5 PRA,P = 0.87)和活动时(4.7 LTA 对 5.6 PRA,P = 0.08)的疼痛评分没有统计学意义。接受 LTA 的患者在住院期间使用的阿片类药物中位数为 110.3 吗啡毫克当量(四分位数间距为 70.1-144.5),而接受 PRA 的患者使用的阿片类药物中位数为 91.0(四分位数间距为 59.1-133.3)(P = 0.16)。线性回归结果显示,不同方法的术后阿片类药物使用量无明显差异(-9.3吗啡毫克当量[95%置信区间-40.7至22.1]):我们的分析发现,在术后疼痛或阿片类药物使用方面,PRA 与 LTA 相比没有明显优势,这与 Barczyński 等人早前的研究结果相反,他们报告称 PRA 术后疼痛更低。这两种方法显示出相似的临床结果,在两者之间做出选择时应基于患者的个体因素,而不是患者报告的疼痛和阿片类药物使用量的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信