Frailty as an independent predictor for midterm adverse outcomes in the elderly undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A longitudinal cohort study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Quyen The Nguyen, Tri Van Nguyen, Thuy Viet Phuong Nguyen, Huy Minh Tran, Son Ngoc Dang, Bang Ngoc Hoan Nguyen, Hai Hoang Pham, Trung Tien Tran, Dang Ngoc Tran, Vien Truong Nguyen, Tan Van Nguyen
{"title":"Frailty as an independent predictor for midterm adverse outcomes in the elderly undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"Quyen The Nguyen, Tri Van Nguyen, Thuy Viet Phuong Nguyen, Huy Minh Tran, Son Ngoc Dang, Bang Ngoc Hoan Nguyen, Hai Hoang Pham, Trung Tien Tran, Dang Ngoc Tran, Vien Truong Nguyen, Tan Van Nguyen","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty is associated with poor health outcomes in elderly population. However, its effect on midterm outcomes in elderly patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the association between frailty, as classified by the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and midterm adverse outcomes in elderly STEMI patients after primary PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study, frailty status of 426 STEMI patients aged ≥60 years undergoing primary PCI was determined using the nine-point CFS 2 weeks before the occurrence of STEMI. Patients scoring at least four points on the CFS were considered frail. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or readmission. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular death, cardiovascular readmission, heart failure-related death or readmission, and myocardial reinfarction. Follow-up data were collected through medical record reviews and/or telephone interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 426 elderly patients, 116 were frail. The median follow-up period was 15 months (interquartile range 5-19 months). Primary outcome events occurred in 87 (75.0%) frail and 75 (24.2%) nonfrail patients. The adjusted hazard ratio was 3.278 after model selection using the Bayesian Model Averaging approach (95% confidence interval 2.372-4.531). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard survival analysis showed that frailty was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of all secondary outcome events after adjusting for TIMI, PAMI, and CADILLAC risk scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty, as defined by the CFS, was independently associated with midterm adverse outcomes in elderly patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty is associated with poor health outcomes in elderly population. However, its effect on midterm outcomes in elderly patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unknown.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the association between frailty, as classified by the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and midterm adverse outcomes in elderly STEMI patients after primary PCI.

Methods: In this prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study, frailty status of 426 STEMI patients aged ≥60 years undergoing primary PCI was determined using the nine-point CFS 2 weeks before the occurrence of STEMI. Patients scoring at least four points on the CFS were considered frail. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or readmission. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular death, cardiovascular readmission, heart failure-related death or readmission, and myocardial reinfarction. Follow-up data were collected through medical record reviews and/or telephone interviews.

Results: Of 426 elderly patients, 116 were frail. The median follow-up period was 15 months (interquartile range 5-19 months). Primary outcome events occurred in 87 (75.0%) frail and 75 (24.2%) nonfrail patients. The adjusted hazard ratio was 3.278 after model selection using the Bayesian Model Averaging approach (95% confidence interval 2.372-4.531). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard survival analysis showed that frailty was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of all secondary outcome events after adjusting for TIMI, PAMI, and CADILLAC risk scores.

Conclusions: Frailty, as defined by the CFS, was independently associated with midterm adverse outcomes in elderly patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI.

虚弱是接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年人中期不良预后的独立预测因素:纵向队列研究。
背景虚弱与老年人的不良健康状况有关。目的:本研究旨在评估根据临床虚弱量表(CFS)分类的虚弱与接受初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 STEMI 老年患者中期不良预后之间的关系:在这项前瞻性、观察性、多中心队列研究中,在 STEMI 发生前 2 周使用九分 CFS 测定了 426 名年龄≥60 岁、接受初级 PCI 治疗的 STEMI 患者的虚弱状况。在 CFS 上至少得 4 分的患者被视为体弱。主要结果是心血管死亡或再入院的复合结果。次要结果包括心血管死亡、心血管再入院、心衰相关死亡或再入院以及心肌再梗塞。随访数据通过病历审查和/或电话访谈收集:结果:在 426 名老年患者中,有 116 名体弱者。随访时间中位数为 15 个月(四分位数间距为 5-19 个月)。87名(75.0%)体弱患者和75名(24.2%)非体弱患者发生了主要结局事件。使用贝叶斯模型平均法选择模型后,调整后的危险比为 3.278(95% 置信区间为 2.372-4.531)。多变量考克斯比例危险生存分析显示,在调整了TIMI、PAMI和CADILLAC风险评分后,虚弱与所有次要结局事件的发生率显著相关:结论:根据 CFS 定义的体弱与接受 STEMI 初级 PCI 治疗的老年患者的中期不良预后密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信