Intraoperative ultrasound for uterine septum resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Giulia Galati, Michela Buccilli, Gina Bongiorno, Oriana Capri, Daniela Pietrangeli, Ludovico Muzii
{"title":"Intraoperative ultrasound for uterine septum resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Giulia Galati, Michela Buccilli, Gina Bongiorno, Oriana Capri, Daniela Pietrangeli, Ludovico Muzii","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07814-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Septate uterus is one of the most common uterine malformations. Recent studies suggest that uterine septa may negatively affect fertility. In cases of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or infertility, hysteroscopic metroplasty has been considered the primary treatment for septate uterus. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether intraoperative ultrasound monitoring may improve the efficacy of hysteroscopic metroplasty compared to other types of intraoperative monitoring or to unguided resections. An electronic database search was performed to identify articles published until June 15, 2023. Five studies (two randomized clinical trials, two prospective studies and one retrospective cohort study) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the rate of residual septum > 10 mm after hysteroscopic metroplasty in the ultrasound (US) monitoring group compared to the rate of residual septum using other types of intraoperative monitoring/no monitoring (control group). The secondary outcomes were any residual septa, surgical time, complications, uterine perforations and reproductive outcomes. Intraoperative ultrasound for uterine septum resection significantly reduced the rate of residual septum > 10 mm and the rate of any residual septa compared to the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the procedure time between women undergoing intraoperative US monitoring versus the control group. A trend toward reduction of surgical complications was observed in the intraoperative US group compared to the control group. In conclusion, intraoperative ultrasound during metroplasty may reduce the rate of the residual septum with no surgical time differences. Further studies are warranted to understand how this may improve reproductive outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07814-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Septate uterus is one of the most common uterine malformations. Recent studies suggest that uterine septa may negatively affect fertility. In cases of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or infertility, hysteroscopic metroplasty has been considered the primary treatment for septate uterus. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether intraoperative ultrasound monitoring may improve the efficacy of hysteroscopic metroplasty compared to other types of intraoperative monitoring or to unguided resections. An electronic database search was performed to identify articles published until June 15, 2023. Five studies (two randomized clinical trials, two prospective studies and one retrospective cohort study) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the rate of residual septum > 10 mm after hysteroscopic metroplasty in the ultrasound (US) monitoring group compared to the rate of residual septum using other types of intraoperative monitoring/no monitoring (control group). The secondary outcomes were any residual septa, surgical time, complications, uterine perforations and reproductive outcomes. Intraoperative ultrasound for uterine septum resection significantly reduced the rate of residual septum > 10 mm and the rate of any residual septa compared to the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the procedure time between women undergoing intraoperative US monitoring versus the control group. A trend toward reduction of surgical complications was observed in the intraoperative US group compared to the control group. In conclusion, intraoperative ultrasound during metroplasty may reduce the rate of the residual septum with no surgical time differences. Further studies are warranted to understand how this may improve reproductive outcomes.

子宫中隔切除术的术中超声:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
子宫纵隔是最常见的子宫畸形之一。最近的研究表明,子宫纵隔可能会对生育能力产生负面影响。在复发性妊娠失败(RPL)或不孕的病例中,宫腔镜下子宫中隔成形术一直被认为是治疗子宫中隔的主要方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估与其他类型的术中监测或无引导切除术相比,术中超声监测是否能提高宫腔镜下子宫中隔成形术的疗效。通过电子数据库检索,找到了截至2023年6月15日发表的文章。五项研究(两项随机临床试验、两项前瞻性研究和一项回顾性队列研究)符合纳入标准。主要结果是超声(US)监测组与使用其他类型术中监测/无监测组(对照组)相比,宫腔镜地铁成形术后中隔残留>10 mm的比率。次要结果包括任何残留隔膜、手术时间、并发症、子宫穿孔和生殖结果。与对照组相比,术中超声子宫隔切除术显著降低了子宫隔残留>10毫米的比率和任何残留子宫隔的比率。与对照组相比,接受术中超声监测的妇女在手术时间上没有统计学差异。与对照组相比,术中超声组的手术并发症有减少的趋势。总之,在鼻中隔成形术中进行术中超声检查可能会降低鼻中隔残留率,但手术时间并无差异。我们需要进一步研究,以了解这将如何改善生殖效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信