Kristin Rathje, Nico Gagelmann, Anita Badbaran, Claudia Langebrake, Adrin Dadkhah, Johanna Richter, Radwan Massoud, Mathias Schäfersküpper, Franziska E. Marquard, Sofia Oechsler, Evgeny Klyuchnikov, Ina Rudolph, Silke Heidenreich, Christian Niederwieser, Catherina Lueck, Dietlinde Janson, Christine Wolschke, Boris Fehse, Francis Ayuk, Nicolaus Kröger
{"title":"Clinical and Immune Effects of Peri-Transplantation JAK Inhibition for Myelofibrosis","authors":"Kristin Rathje, Nico Gagelmann, Anita Badbaran, Claudia Langebrake, Adrin Dadkhah, Johanna Richter, Radwan Massoud, Mathias Schäfersküpper, Franziska E. Marquard, Sofia Oechsler, Evgeny Klyuchnikov, Ina Rudolph, Silke Heidenreich, Christian Niederwieser, Catherina Lueck, Dietlinde Janson, Christine Wolschke, Boris Fehse, Francis Ayuk, Nicolaus Kröger","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the introduction of JAK inhibitors, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with myelofibrosis but has considerable treatment-related complications. Whether the incorporation of JAK inhibition into the transplant algorithm leads to improved outcomes is still unclear. Here, we analyzed different transplant platforms in myelofibrosis patients undergoing a first transplant, comparing immune profiles and outcomes of (1) 33 patients continuing JAK inhibition at start of conditioning until stable engraftment (PERI-group), (2) 38 patients receiving JAK inhibition prior to transplant until start of conditioning (PRE-group), and (3) 38 patients that had never received JAK inhibition (NON-group). Patients in the PERI-group showed significantly higher early B-cell recovery as well as significantly increased late recovery of gamma-delta T cells and NK cells. We observed excellent neutrophil and platelet engraftment (100% for both) in the PERI-group and no hematotoxic effects or increased rates of infections following peri-transplant JAK inhibition. Cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) grade II-IV at day 100 after transplant was 15% in the PERI-group versus 29% in the PRE-group versus 34% in the NON-group. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 year after transplant was 9% in the PERI-group compared with 16% in the PRE-group and 18% in the NON-group. In conclusion, peri-transplant JAK inhibition was feasible with promising engraftment and acute GvHD rates, though deserves further investigation.","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27529","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite the introduction of JAK inhibitors, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with myelofibrosis but has considerable treatment-related complications. Whether the incorporation of JAK inhibition into the transplant algorithm leads to improved outcomes is still unclear. Here, we analyzed different transplant platforms in myelofibrosis patients undergoing a first transplant, comparing immune profiles and outcomes of (1) 33 patients continuing JAK inhibition at start of conditioning until stable engraftment (PERI-group), (2) 38 patients receiving JAK inhibition prior to transplant until start of conditioning (PRE-group), and (3) 38 patients that had never received JAK inhibition (NON-group). Patients in the PERI-group showed significantly higher early B-cell recovery as well as significantly increased late recovery of gamma-delta T cells and NK cells. We observed excellent neutrophil and platelet engraftment (100% for both) in the PERI-group and no hematotoxic effects or increased rates of infections following peri-transplant JAK inhibition. Cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) grade II-IV at day 100 after transplant was 15% in the PERI-group versus 29% in the PRE-group versus 34% in the NON-group. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 year after transplant was 9% in the PERI-group compared with 16% in the PRE-group and 18% in the NON-group. In conclusion, peri-transplant JAK inhibition was feasible with promising engraftment and acute GvHD rates, though deserves further investigation.
尽管引入了JAK抑制剂,异基因造血细胞移植仍是骨髓纤维化患者唯一可能治愈的治疗方法,但治疗相关并发症也相当多。将JAK抑制剂纳入移植算法是否会改善治疗效果,目前仍不清楚。在此,我们对首次接受移植的骨髓纤维化患者的不同移植平台进行了分析,比较了(1)33 例患者在调理开始时继续使用 JAK 抑制剂直至稳定移植(PERI 组);(2)38 例患者在移植前接受 JAK 抑制剂直至调理开始(PRE 组);(3)38 例患者从未使用过 JAK 抑制剂(NON 组)的免疫概况和预后。PERI 组患者的早期 B 细胞恢复能力明显提高,后期γ-δ T 细胞和 NK 细胞恢复能力也明显提高。我们观察到,PERI 组患者的中性粒细胞和血小板移植效果极佳(均为 100%),而且在移植前抑制 JAK 后没有出现血液毒性反应或感染率升高。移植后第 100 天,急性移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)II-IV 级的累积发生率在 PERI 组为 15%,在 PRE 组为 29%,在 NON 组为 34%。移植后 1 年,PERI 组的累积复发率为 9%,而 PRE 组为 16%,NON 组为 18%。总之,移植前抑制 JAK 是可行的,其移植率和急性 GvHD 发生率都很乐观,但仍值得进一步研究。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Hematology offers extensive coverage of experimental and clinical aspects of blood diseases in humans and animal models. The journal publishes original contributions in both non-malignant and malignant hematological diseases, encompassing clinical and basic studies in areas such as hemostasis, thrombosis, immunology, blood banking, and stem cell biology. Clinical translational reports highlighting innovative therapeutic approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases are actively encouraged.The American Journal of Hematology features regular original laboratory and clinical research articles, brief research reports, critical reviews, images in hematology, as well as letters and correspondence.