Explosion dynamics for thermal runaway gases of 314 Ah LiFePO4 lithium-ion batteries triggered by overheating and overcharging

IF 6.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Hao Chen , Kai Yang , Jian Shao , Youwei Liu , Mingjie Zhang , Bin Wei , Haoyu Song , Peng Xiao , Tong Liu , Yuxuan Wan
{"title":"Explosion dynamics for thermal runaway gases of 314 Ah LiFePO4 lithium-ion batteries triggered by overheating and overcharging","authors":"Hao Chen ,&nbsp;Kai Yang ,&nbsp;Jian Shao ,&nbsp;Youwei Liu ,&nbsp;Mingjie Zhang ,&nbsp;Bin Wei ,&nbsp;Haoyu Song ,&nbsp;Peng Xiao ,&nbsp;Tong Liu ,&nbsp;Yuxuan Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2024.10.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thermal runaway (TR) of LiFePO<sub>4</sub> lithium-ion batteries (LFPs) can produce significant amounts of smoke, posing serious explosion hazards. This paper systematically investigated TR gas generation, explosion limits, explosion overpressure, and post-explosion gas compositions of 314 Ah LFPs under overcharging and overheating. Quantum chemical and explosion reaction kinetics calculations clarified the elementary reactions and compositional alterations occurring in gases and free radicals during the explosion process. The findings revealed that H<sub>2</sub> constituted the primary component of TR gases, comprising 47.64 % and 53.12 % of the overcharging and overheating, respectively, followed by CO<sub>2</sub> and CO. The ranges of explosion concentration for TR gases, when subjected to overheating and overcharging conditions, were 6.32–29.3 % and 6.83–26.91 %, respectively. At the point of maximum explosion overpressure (<em>P</em><sub>max</sub>), the gas concentrations peaked at 15.86 % and 16.25 %. The elementary reaction R1 held a pivotal position in enhancing the explosion overpressure. As the TR gas concentration escalated, the Rate of Production (ROP) of R31 and R35 also surged, ultimately resulting in elevated concentrations of CO. The reactions R123, R250, and R279 facilitated the generation of H<sub>2</sub> while simultaneously consuming hydrocarbon gases. This resulted in a risk of secondary explosion of the TR gas after the explosion. Post-explosion gas residual quantities followed the order: C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub> &lt; C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> &lt; CH<sub>4</sub> &lt; H<sub>2</sub> &lt; CO. The results revealed crucial insights for developing explosion prevention and suppression in the process safety industry and Energy Storage Systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"192 ","pages":"Pages 1238-1248"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582024013995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thermal runaway (TR) of LiFePO4 lithium-ion batteries (LFPs) can produce significant amounts of smoke, posing serious explosion hazards. This paper systematically investigated TR gas generation, explosion limits, explosion overpressure, and post-explosion gas compositions of 314 Ah LFPs under overcharging and overheating. Quantum chemical and explosion reaction kinetics calculations clarified the elementary reactions and compositional alterations occurring in gases and free radicals during the explosion process. The findings revealed that H2 constituted the primary component of TR gases, comprising 47.64 % and 53.12 % of the overcharging and overheating, respectively, followed by CO2 and CO. The ranges of explosion concentration for TR gases, when subjected to overheating and overcharging conditions, were 6.32–29.3 % and 6.83–26.91 %, respectively. At the point of maximum explosion overpressure (Pmax), the gas concentrations peaked at 15.86 % and 16.25 %. The elementary reaction R1 held a pivotal position in enhancing the explosion overpressure. As the TR gas concentration escalated, the Rate of Production (ROP) of R31 and R35 also surged, ultimately resulting in elevated concentrations of CO. The reactions R123, R250, and R279 facilitated the generation of H2 while simultaneously consuming hydrocarbon gases. This resulted in a risk of secondary explosion of the TR gas after the explosion. Post-explosion gas residual quantities followed the order: C2H6 < C2H4 < CH4 < H2 < CO. The results revealed crucial insights for developing explosion prevention and suppression in the process safety industry and Energy Storage Systems.
过热和过度充电引发的 314 Ah LiFePO4 锂离子电池热失控气体的爆炸动力学特性
磷酸铁锂离子电池(LFP)的热失控(TR)会产生大量烟雾,带来严重的爆炸危险。本文系统研究了 314 Ah 锂离子电池在过充电和过热情况下的 TR 气体产生、爆炸极限、爆炸超压和爆炸后气体成分。量子化学和爆炸反应动力学计算阐明了爆炸过程中气体和自由基发生的基本反应和成分变化。研究结果表明,H2 是 TR 气体的主要成分,分别占过充和过热气体的 47.64% 和 53.12%,其次是 CO2 和 CO。在过热和过压条件下,TR 气体的爆炸浓度范围分别为 6.32-29.3 % 和 6.83-26.91%。在最大爆炸超压点(Pmax),气体浓度分别达到 15.86 % 和 16.25 % 的峰值。基本反应 R1 在提高爆炸超压方面起着关键作用。随着 TR 气体浓度的上升,R31 和 R35 的生产率 (ROP) 也急剧上升,最终导致 CO 浓度升高。反应 R123、R250 和 R279 在消耗碳氢化合物气体的同时促进了 H2 的生成。这导致了爆炸后 TR 气体二次爆炸的风险。爆炸后气体残留量的顺序为C2H6 < C2H4 < CH4 < H2 < CO。研究结果为流程安全行业和储能系统的防爆和抑爆发展提供了重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信