Alfalfa potassium and phosphorus uptake and use efficiencies as impacted by irrigation technology, deficit irrigation, and alfalfa cultivar

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Dakota Boren, Tina Sullivan, Bradley S. Crookston, Matt Yost, Grant Cardon, Joseph Creech
{"title":"Alfalfa potassium and phosphorus uptake and use efficiencies as impacted by irrigation technology, deficit irrigation, and alfalfa cultivar","authors":"Dakota Boren,&nbsp;Tina Sullivan,&nbsp;Bradley S. Crookston,&nbsp;Matt Yost,&nbsp;Grant Cardon,&nbsp;Joseph Creech","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As competition for limited water resources in the western United States and other arid and semiarid regions intensifies, there is a need to provide alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i>) growers with knowledge of how water-optimizing practices impact alfalfa nutrient use. The objective of this research was to evaluate how three water management strategies, and their interactions, influence alfalfa K and P concentration, uptake, uptake efficiency, and internal use efficiency. Alfalfa cultivars, deficit irrigation, and irrigation technologies were tested at two sites in Utah during 2020–2021. A single drought-tolerant (DT) cultivar (‘Ladak II’) was compared to a conventional alfalfa cultivar specific to each location. Four irrigation rates (100%, uniform reductions of 25% and 50%, and a targeted reduction of ∼50%) were nested within five pivot irrigation technologies. Few alfalfa K and P nutrient dynamics responded to the interactions of cultivar and rate or technology. Nutrient responses to the irrigation technologies were strongly associated with the technology effect on alfalfa yield such that uptake efficiency was sometimes greater with low-elevation sprinkler technologies. The K and P responses to deficit irrigation were most pronounced at the uniform or targeted 50% irrigation rate. Alfalfa cultivar had the least impact on alfalfa K and P dynamics, and the DT cultivar never improved uptake or efficiencies. These results indicate that few adjustments in K and P management may be needed with the three water optimization approaches evaluated in this study. The most notable is that K and P fertilizer input can likely be reduced with severe deficit irrigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"3273-3286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As competition for limited water resources in the western United States and other arid and semiarid regions intensifies, there is a need to provide alfalfa (Medicago sativa) growers with knowledge of how water-optimizing practices impact alfalfa nutrient use. The objective of this research was to evaluate how three water management strategies, and their interactions, influence alfalfa K and P concentration, uptake, uptake efficiency, and internal use efficiency. Alfalfa cultivars, deficit irrigation, and irrigation technologies were tested at two sites in Utah during 2020–2021. A single drought-tolerant (DT) cultivar (‘Ladak II’) was compared to a conventional alfalfa cultivar specific to each location. Four irrigation rates (100%, uniform reductions of 25% and 50%, and a targeted reduction of ∼50%) were nested within five pivot irrigation technologies. Few alfalfa K and P nutrient dynamics responded to the interactions of cultivar and rate or technology. Nutrient responses to the irrigation technologies were strongly associated with the technology effect on alfalfa yield such that uptake efficiency was sometimes greater with low-elevation sprinkler technologies. The K and P responses to deficit irrigation were most pronounced at the uniform or targeted 50% irrigation rate. Alfalfa cultivar had the least impact on alfalfa K and P dynamics, and the DT cultivar never improved uptake or efficiencies. These results indicate that few adjustments in K and P management may be needed with the three water optimization approaches evaluated in this study. The most notable is that K and P fertilizer input can likely be reduced with severe deficit irrigation.

灌溉技术、亏缺灌溉和紫花苜蓿栽培品种对紫花苜蓿钾和磷吸收和利用效率的影响
随着美国西部及其他干旱和半干旱地区对有限水资源的争夺日益加剧,有必要让紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)种植者了解水优化措施对紫花苜蓿养分利用的影响。本研究的目的是评估三种水分管理策略及其相互作用如何影响紫花苜蓿钾和钾的浓度、吸收量、吸收效率和内部利用效率。2020-2021 年期间,在犹他州的两个地点对紫花苜蓿栽培品种、亏缺灌溉和灌溉技术进行了测试。将单一耐旱(DT)栽培品种('Ladak II')与每个地点特有的传统紫花苜蓿栽培品种进行了比较。四种灌溉率(100%、均匀减少 25% 和 50% 以及目标减少 50%)被嵌套在五种枢轴灌溉技术中。几乎没有苜蓿钾和钾养分动态对栽培品种和灌溉速率或技术的相互作用做出反应。养分对灌溉技术的响应与技术对紫花苜蓿产量的影响密切相关,因此低海拔喷灌技术的吸收效率有时更高。钾和磷对亏缺灌溉的反应在均匀灌溉率或目标灌溉率为 50%时最为明显。紫花苜蓿栽培品种对苜蓿钾和钾动态的影响最小,而DT栽培品种从未提高吸收率或效率。这些结果表明,本研究评估的三种水分优化方法可能只需对钾和磷的管理进行少量调整。最值得注意的是,严重亏缺灌溉可能会减少钾肥和磷肥的投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信