Quantifying public support for culling crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster spp.) on the Great Barrier Reef

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Stewart Lockie, Henry A. Bartelet, Brent W. Ritchie, Lintje Sie, Gillian Paxton
{"title":"Quantifying public support for culling crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster spp.) on the Great Barrier Reef","authors":"Stewart Lockie,&nbsp;Henry A. Bartelet,&nbsp;Brent W. Ritchie,&nbsp;Lintje Sie,&nbsp;Gillian Paxton","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Population surges of crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) (<i>Acanthaster</i> spp.) are a leading cause of coral cover loss on Australia's Great Barrier Reef (GBR). While COTS culling has been undertaken since 2012 little is known about how the public perceive COTS culling or how perceptions vary among social groups. Drawing on survey data collected in 2018 and 2022 we test the relative influence of demographic variables, social and institutional variables, and beliefs concerning the risks and benefits of culling, on public acceptance for the culling of COTS on the GBR. In contrast with previous research suggesting a polarization of views, we found limited opposition to culling (12% in 2018 and 8% in 2022). Remaining respondents, however, were almost equally divided between those who agreed or strongly agreed with culling and those who were neutral or only slightly in agreement. The strongest predictors of support, in terms of standardized mean odds ratios, were the perceived social, environmental, and ethical responsibility of culling (1.57), the manageability of culling risks (1.46), the personal importance of the GBR to the respondent (1.33), trust in science to deliver solutions (1.30), confidence in management of the GBR (1.26), and how much of a threat respondents believed COTS posed to the Reef (1.25). These findings suggest public communications about COTS culling might usefully focus on how scientific understanding, ongoing research, ecosystem monitoring, and partnerships with Reef Traditional Owners and stakeholders guide operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"6 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13252","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13252","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population surges of crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) (Acanthaster spp.) are a leading cause of coral cover loss on Australia's Great Barrier Reef (GBR). While COTS culling has been undertaken since 2012 little is known about how the public perceive COTS culling or how perceptions vary among social groups. Drawing on survey data collected in 2018 and 2022 we test the relative influence of demographic variables, social and institutional variables, and beliefs concerning the risks and benefits of culling, on public acceptance for the culling of COTS on the GBR. In contrast with previous research suggesting a polarization of views, we found limited opposition to culling (12% in 2018 and 8% in 2022). Remaining respondents, however, were almost equally divided between those who agreed or strongly agreed with culling and those who were neutral or only slightly in agreement. The strongest predictors of support, in terms of standardized mean odds ratios, were the perceived social, environmental, and ethical responsibility of culling (1.57), the manageability of culling risks (1.46), the personal importance of the GBR to the respondent (1.33), trust in science to deliver solutions (1.30), confidence in management of the GBR (1.26), and how much of a threat respondents believed COTS posed to the Reef (1.25). These findings suggest public communications about COTS culling might usefully focus on how scientific understanding, ongoing research, ecosystem monitoring, and partnerships with Reef Traditional Owners and stakeholders guide operations.

Abstract Image

量化公众对在大堡礁捕杀棘冠海星(Acanthaster spp.)
刺冠海星(COTS)(Acanthaster spp.)的数量激增是澳大利亚大堡礁(GBR)珊瑚覆盖率下降的主要原因。虽然自 2012 年以来一直在开展捕杀刺冠海星的活动,但人们对公众如何看待捕杀刺冠海星或不同社会群体的看法有何差异知之甚少。利用 2018 年和 2022 年收集的调查数据,我们检验了人口统计学变量、社会和制度变量以及有关扑杀风险和益处的信念对公众接受在 GBR 上扑杀 COTS 的相对影响。与以往研究表明的观点两极分化不同,我们发现反对扑杀的比例有限(2018 年为 12%,2022 年为 8%)。然而,其余的受访者中,同意或非常同意扑杀的人与中立或仅略微同意的人几乎各占一半。从标准化的平均几率比来看,支持率最高的预测因素是:受访者认为扑杀的社会、环境和道德责任(1.57),扑杀风险的可控性(1.46),GBR 对受访者个人的重要性(1.33),对科学提供解决方案的信任(1.30),对 GBR 管理的信心(1.26),以及受访者认为 COTS 对珊瑚礁的威胁程度(1.25)。这些调查结果表明,有关捕杀COTS的公众宣传可以将重点放在如何通过科学理解、持续研究、生态系统监测以及与珊瑚礁传统所有者和利益相关者的合作来指导操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信