Economic evaluation of corn relative maturity hybrids in corn–pennycress–soybean rotations

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Yesuf Assen Mohammed, Russ W. Gesch, Samantha Wells, Nicholas J. Heller, Alexander J. Lindsey, Alexander W. Hard, Winthrop B. Phippen
{"title":"Economic evaluation of corn relative maturity hybrids in corn–pennycress–soybean rotations","authors":"Yesuf Assen Mohammed,&nbsp;Russ W. Gesch,&nbsp;Samantha Wells,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Heller,&nbsp;Alexander J. Lindsey,&nbsp;Alexander W. Hard,&nbsp;Winthrop B. Phippen","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This manuscript is a follow-up of previously published results that presented findings on pennycress (<i>Thlaspi arvense</i> L.) establishment and agronomics in response to previous corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) relative maturity (CRM) hybrids grown for grain and silage in the corn–pennycress–soybean [<i>Glycine m</i>ax (L.)] rotations. In this manuscript, we compared the economics of grain corn–pennycress–soybean rotations (grain rotation) with silage corn–pennycress–soybean rotations (silage rotation). The treatments were CRM hybrids ranging from 76 to 95 days (full season) at northern sites (Morris and Rosemount, MN) and 95 to 113 days (full season) at southern sites (Lexington, IL, and Custar, OH). Full-season corn harvested for silage was included as a control treatment representing optimum conditions for sowing pennycress. A partial budget procedure was used for economic analysis. The results showed that the annualized net benefits (ANBs) ranged from $315 to $945 ha<sup>−1</sup>. The silage rotation produced greater ANBs than the grain rotation at all sites due to increased pennycress seed yield. In the grain rotation, the 105 days in the south, 95 days corn at Morris, and 86 days corn at Rosemount resulted in minimal ANB losses compared with silage rotation. Among grain corn treatments, some of the early CRM hybrids resulted in greater ANBs (up to 40%) than the full season hybrid. Results demonstrate potential to integrate pennycress into a grain rotation using early CRM hybrids. In addition, valuing the diverse ecosystem benefits that pennycress offers as a cash cover crop during the offseason between corn and soybean rotation may help to attract growers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"3171-3180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This manuscript is a follow-up of previously published results that presented findings on pennycress (Thlaspi arvense L.) establishment and agronomics in response to previous corn (Zea mays L.) relative maturity (CRM) hybrids grown for grain and silage in the corn–pennycress–soybean [Glycine max (L.)] rotations. In this manuscript, we compared the economics of grain corn–pennycress–soybean rotations (grain rotation) with silage corn–pennycress–soybean rotations (silage rotation). The treatments were CRM hybrids ranging from 76 to 95 days (full season) at northern sites (Morris and Rosemount, MN) and 95 to 113 days (full season) at southern sites (Lexington, IL, and Custar, OH). Full-season corn harvested for silage was included as a control treatment representing optimum conditions for sowing pennycress. A partial budget procedure was used for economic analysis. The results showed that the annualized net benefits (ANBs) ranged from $315 to $945 ha−1. The silage rotation produced greater ANBs than the grain rotation at all sites due to increased pennycress seed yield. In the grain rotation, the 105 days in the south, 95 days corn at Morris, and 86 days corn at Rosemount resulted in minimal ANB losses compared with silage rotation. Among grain corn treatments, some of the early CRM hybrids resulted in greater ANBs (up to 40%) than the full season hybrid. Results demonstrate potential to integrate pennycress into a grain rotation using early CRM hybrids. In addition, valuing the diverse ecosystem benefits that pennycress offers as a cash cover crop during the offseason between corn and soybean rotation may help to attract growers.

玉米-芹菜-大豆轮作中玉米相对成熟度杂交种的经济性评估
本手稿是对以前发表的关于菥蓂(Thlaspi arvense L.)在玉米-菥蓂-大豆(Glycine max (L.))轮作的谷物和青贮玉米(Zea mays L.)相对成熟度(CRM)杂交种下的建立和农艺学反应的研究结果的后续。在本手稿中,我们比较了谷物玉米-菥蓂-大豆轮作(谷物轮作)与青贮玉米-菥蓂-大豆轮作(青贮轮作)的经济效益。在北部研究地点(明尼苏达州莫里斯市和罗斯蒙特市),处理为 76 至 95 天(全季)的 CRM 杂交品种;在南部研究地点(伊利诺伊州列克星敦市和俄亥俄州库斯塔市),处理为 95 至 113 天(全季)的 CRM 杂交品种。收获用于青贮的全季玉米作为对照处理,代表了菥蓂播种的最佳条件。经济分析采用了部分预算程序。结果表明,年化净效益(ANBs)从每公顷 315 美元到 945 美元不等。由于菥蓂种子产量增加,在所有地点,青贮轮作产生的年净收益都高于谷物轮作。在谷物轮作中,与青贮轮作相比,南部 105 天、莫里斯 95 天和罗斯蒙特 86 天的玉米轮作产生的 ANB 损失最小。在谷物玉米处理中,一些早期 CRM 杂交种比全季杂交种的 ANB 更大(高达 40%)。结果表明,使用早期 CRM 杂交种将菥蓂纳入谷物轮作中具有潜力。此外,在玉米和大豆轮作的淡季,菥蓂作为经济覆盖作物所带来的多种生态系统效益可能有助于吸引种植者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信