A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Biosecurity in Disease Prevention and Control in Livestock Farms in Africa

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ronald Vougat Ngom, Gaspard J. Ayissi, Adonis M. M. Akoussa, Andrea Laconi, Saleh M. Jajere, Henriette A. Zangue, Alessandra Piccirillo
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Biosecurity in Disease Prevention and Control in Livestock Farms in Africa","authors":"Ronald Vougat Ngom,&nbsp;Gaspard J. Ayissi,&nbsp;Adonis M. M. Akoussa,&nbsp;Andrea Laconi,&nbsp;Saleh M. Jajere,&nbsp;Henriette A. Zangue,&nbsp;Alessandra Piccirillo","doi":"10.1155/2024/8683715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>In Africa, livestock production plays a crucial role for sustainable food security and economic growth. However, the development of this sector has been delayed by livestock diseases, one of the main constraints, which can cause important production and economic losses. To overcome these constraints, farmers extensively use antimicrobials, which in turn can lead to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), one of the main threats to global health and food security. Biosecurity has been identified as a key strategy to reduce livestock diseases. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted according to the Cochrane guideline, aimed at determining the efficacy of biosecurity in preventing and controlling infectious diseases in livestock farms in Africa. Of the 1408 records retrieved from five different databases, only 16 met the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted in Egypt (31.2%), Nigeria (31.2%), Uganda (18.8%), Ethiopia (12.5%) and Tunisia (6.3%) and concerned poultry (62.4%), pigs (18.8%) and cattle (18.8%). Investigations focused mainly on avian influenza (AI) (15.0%) and coccidiosis (10.0%) in poultry and African swine fever (ASF) (10.0%) in pigs. In poultry farms, the results of the pairwise meta-analysis showed that biosecurity measures related to visitors and farmworkers could be effective at reducing the risk of introduction and spread of AI viruses (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.82). Moreover, inadequate biosecurity seemed to be a factor promoting coccidiosis (OR = 4.20; 95% CI 2.4–7.4) and AI (OR = 1.74; 95% CI 1.23–2.48). Prevention of ASF was significantly associated with the application of biosecurity measures related to animals’ transport, removal of carcasses and manure (OR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.12–0.88). Despite their importance, these findings cannot be translated to the entire African continent, since no studies were available for more than 90% of its countries. More research should be carried out to fill in the gaps identified by this review.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8683715","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8683715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Africa, livestock production plays a crucial role for sustainable food security and economic growth. However, the development of this sector has been delayed by livestock diseases, one of the main constraints, which can cause important production and economic losses. To overcome these constraints, farmers extensively use antimicrobials, which in turn can lead to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), one of the main threats to global health and food security. Biosecurity has been identified as a key strategy to reduce livestock diseases. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted according to the Cochrane guideline, aimed at determining the efficacy of biosecurity in preventing and controlling infectious diseases in livestock farms in Africa. Of the 1408 records retrieved from five different databases, only 16 met the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted in Egypt (31.2%), Nigeria (31.2%), Uganda (18.8%), Ethiopia (12.5%) and Tunisia (6.3%) and concerned poultry (62.4%), pigs (18.8%) and cattle (18.8%). Investigations focused mainly on avian influenza (AI) (15.0%) and coccidiosis (10.0%) in poultry and African swine fever (ASF) (10.0%) in pigs. In poultry farms, the results of the pairwise meta-analysis showed that biosecurity measures related to visitors and farmworkers could be effective at reducing the risk of introduction and spread of AI viruses (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.82). Moreover, inadequate biosecurity seemed to be a factor promoting coccidiosis (OR = 4.20; 95% CI 2.4–7.4) and AI (OR = 1.74; 95% CI 1.23–2.48). Prevention of ASF was significantly associated with the application of biosecurity measures related to animals’ transport, removal of carcasses and manure (OR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.12–0.88). Despite their importance, these findings cannot be translated to the entire African continent, since no studies were available for more than 90% of its countries. More research should be carried out to fill in the gaps identified by this review.

Abstract Image

非洲畜牧场生物安全防控疾病功效的系统回顾和元分析
在非洲,畜牧业生产对可持续粮食安全和经济增长起着至关重要的作用。然而,作为主要制约因素之一的牲畜疾病却延误了这一行业的发展,并可能造成重大的生产和经济损失。为了克服这些制约因素,农民广泛使用抗菌素,而这反过来又会导致抗菌素抗药性(AMR),这是对全球健康和粮食安全的主要威胁之一。生物安全已被确定为减少牲畜疾病的关键战略。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析根据 Cochrane 指南进行,旨在确定生物安全在预防和控制非洲畜牧场传染病方面的功效。从五个不同数据库中检索到的 1408 条记录中,只有 16 条符合纳入标准。这些研究分别在埃及(31.2%)、尼日利亚(31.2%)、乌干达(18.8%)、埃塞俄比亚(12.5%)和突尼斯(6.3%)进行,涉及家禽(62.4%)、猪(18.8%)和牛(18.8%)。调查主要集中在家禽的禽流感(15.0%)和球虫病(10.0%)以及猪的非洲猪瘟(10.0%)。在家禽养殖场,配对荟萃分析结果显示,与访客和农场工人有关的生物安全措施可有效降低禽流感病毒传入和传播的风险(几率比 [OR] = 0.48;95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.28-0.82)。此外,生物安全不足似乎也是诱发球虫病(OR = 4.20;95% CI 2.4-7.4)和禽流感(OR = 1.74;95% CI 1.23-2.48)的一个因素。ASF 的预防与动物运输、清除尸体和粪便的生物安全措施的应用密切相关(OR = 0.33;95% CI 0.12-0.88)。尽管这些研究结果非常重要,但不能将其推广到整个非洲大陆,因为90%以上的非洲国家都没有相关研究。应开展更多研究,以填补本综述所发现的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 农林科学-传染病学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
350
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions): Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread. Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope. Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies. Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies). Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信