{"title":"Yield gap analysis for rainfed grain sorghum in Kansas","authors":"Sarah Sexton-Bowser, Andres Patrignani","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the United States, grain sorghum [<i>Sorghum bicolor</i> (L.) Moench] production is concentrated in the US Great Plains region, with the state of Kansas accounting for ∼50% of the planted area. In Kansas, state-level grain yields steadily increased at a rate of 0.07 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> from 1957 to 1990. However, since 1990, sorghum yield trends across the United States and Kansas have been exhibiting signs of yield stagnation. The objectives of this study were to (1) quantify the magnitude of the yield gap and (2) identify possible reasons for yield stagnation of rainfed sorghum in Kansas. Current yield (<i>Y</i><sub>c</sub>) was estimated as the average yield of the most recently reported 10 years. Maximum attainable yield (<i>Y</i><sub>a</sub>) and water-limited potential yield (<i>Y</i><sub>w</sub>) were estimated with a frontier yield function using an extensive dataset of crop performance trials, yield contest data, and county-level survey yield data totaling 2997 site-years. State-level <i>Y</i><sub>c</sub> was 4.7 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>, which represents 77% of <i>Y</i><sub>a</sub> and 49% of <i>Y</i><sub>w</sub>. At a regional level, there is a trend of increasing yield gap in central and western Kansas sorghum-producing regions. Sorghum yield in Kansas appears to be stagnant due to a small exploitable yield gap relative to <i>Y</i><sub>a</sub> rather than <i>Y</i><sub>w</sub>, a statewide shift in planting area to environments more vulnerable to water deficits, and cultivation in soils with moderate to severe limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"2901-2911"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21684","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the United States, grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production is concentrated in the US Great Plains region, with the state of Kansas accounting for ∼50% of the planted area. In Kansas, state-level grain yields steadily increased at a rate of 0.07 Mg ha−1 year−1 from 1957 to 1990. However, since 1990, sorghum yield trends across the United States and Kansas have been exhibiting signs of yield stagnation. The objectives of this study were to (1) quantify the magnitude of the yield gap and (2) identify possible reasons for yield stagnation of rainfed sorghum in Kansas. Current yield (Yc) was estimated as the average yield of the most recently reported 10 years. Maximum attainable yield (Ya) and water-limited potential yield (Yw) were estimated with a frontier yield function using an extensive dataset of crop performance trials, yield contest data, and county-level survey yield data totaling 2997 site-years. State-level Yc was 4.7 Mg ha−1, which represents 77% of Ya and 49% of Yw. At a regional level, there is a trend of increasing yield gap in central and western Kansas sorghum-producing regions. Sorghum yield in Kansas appears to be stagnant due to a small exploitable yield gap relative to Ya rather than Yw, a statewide shift in planting area to environments more vulnerable to water deficits, and cultivation in soils with moderate to severe limitations.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.