Does money motivate prospective foster parents? Are responses from high vs. low-income towns different? Evidence from Google advertising

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Subroto Roy, Jayanti Roy
{"title":"Does money motivate prospective foster parents? Are responses from high vs. low-income towns different? Evidence from Google advertising","authors":"Subroto Roy,&nbsp;Jayanti Roy","doi":"10.1002/car.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recruiting foster parents is a worldwide challenge. In the US, foster parents are supposed to volunteer but receive stipends to cover the cost of foster children. Thus, Foster Care agencies hesitate to highlight the Stipend in their recruitment messaging to prospective foster parents. This hesitation is to weed out extrinsically (stipend) motivated prospective parents early in the application, training and licensing process.</p><p>The first step in foster parent recruitment is to start the conversation between prospective foster care parents and foster parent recruiters.</p><p>Extant research has relied on <i>current or former</i> foster parents to find their motivations for fostering and continuing to foster. We believe ours is the first study to empirically examine whether mentioning money (stipend) early in the recruitment process makes a difference in the response of <i>prospective</i> foster parents.</p><p>The research reports Google ads data from two foster parent recruitment campaigns. These Google search ads showed when “foster parenting” related words were Googled. One ad had the word “stipend,” and the other did not. We then examine differences in response between high and low-income towns. Next, we analysed differences in click behaviour over 207 days between the two versions of the ads. We then examined differences in click behaviour between residents of high and low-income towns. We used the <i>t</i>-test to test for differences in our data analysis approach.</p><p>We find no statistical difference in response between the ads that mention ‘stipend’ and those that do not (<i>t</i> = 0.64, <i>p</i> = 0.26). However, residents of low-income towns are five times more likely to click on a foster parent ad than residents from high-income towns, irrespective of whether the stipend is mentioned in the ad (without mentioning stipend: <i>t</i> = 3.21, <i>p</i> = 0.0008; mentioning Stipend: <i>t</i> = 3.77, <i>p</i> = 0.0001).</p>","PeriodicalId":47371,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse Review","volume":"33 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recruiting foster parents is a worldwide challenge. In the US, foster parents are supposed to volunteer but receive stipends to cover the cost of foster children. Thus, Foster Care agencies hesitate to highlight the Stipend in their recruitment messaging to prospective foster parents. This hesitation is to weed out extrinsically (stipend) motivated prospective parents early in the application, training and licensing process.

The first step in foster parent recruitment is to start the conversation between prospective foster care parents and foster parent recruiters.

Extant research has relied on current or former foster parents to find their motivations for fostering and continuing to foster. We believe ours is the first study to empirically examine whether mentioning money (stipend) early in the recruitment process makes a difference in the response of prospective foster parents.

The research reports Google ads data from two foster parent recruitment campaigns. These Google search ads showed when “foster parenting” related words were Googled. One ad had the word “stipend,” and the other did not. We then examine differences in response between high and low-income towns. Next, we analysed differences in click behaviour over 207 days between the two versions of the ads. We then examined differences in click behaviour between residents of high and low-income towns. We used the t-test to test for differences in our data analysis approach.

We find no statistical difference in response between the ads that mention ‘stipend’ and those that do not (t = 0.64, p = 0.26). However, residents of low-income towns are five times more likely to click on a foster parent ad than residents from high-income towns, irrespective of whether the stipend is mentioned in the ad (without mentioning stipend: t = 3.21, p = 0.0008; mentioning Stipend: t = 3.77, p = 0.0001).

金钱是否会激励未来的寄养父母?高收入城镇与低收入城镇的反应是否不同?来自谷歌广告的证据
招募寄养父母是一项世界性挑战。在美国,寄养父母应该是自愿的,但他们可以领取津贴,以支付寄养儿童的费用。因此,寄养机构在向潜在寄养父母发出招募信息时,并不愿意强调津贴。这种犹豫不决的态度是为了在申请、培训和许可过程的早期,就将那些出于外在动机(津贴)的准养父母淘汰出局。我们相信,我们的研究是第一项以实证研究的方式探讨在招募过程中尽早提及金钱(津贴)是否会对潜在寄养父母的反应产生影响的研究。这项研究报告了两次寄养父母招募活动中的谷歌广告数据。这些谷歌搜索广告显示了 "寄养父母 "相关词汇在谷歌上的搜索情况。其中一个广告有 "津贴 "一词,另一个则没有。然后,我们研究了高收入城镇和低收入城镇之间的响应差异。接着,我们分析了两个版本的广告在 207 天内的点击行为差异。然后,我们研究了高收入城镇居民和低收入城镇居民点击行为的差异。我们使用 t 检验来检验数据分析方法的差异。我们发现,提及 "津贴 "的广告与未提及 "津贴 "的广告在响应度上没有统计学差异(t = 0.64,p = 0.26)。然而,无论广告中是否提及津贴,低收入城镇居民点击寄养父母广告的可能性是高收入城镇居民的五倍(未提及津贴:t = 3.21,p = 0.0008;提及津贴:t = 3.77,p = 0.0001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child Abuse Review
Child Abuse Review Multiple-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Child Abuse Review provides a forum for all professionals working in the field of child protection, giving them access to the latest research findings, practice developments, training initiatives and policy issues. The Journal"s remit includes all forms of maltreatment, whether they occur inside or outside the family environment. Papers are written in a style appropriate for a multidisciplinary audience and those from outside Britain are welcomed. The Journal maintains a practice orientated focus and authors of research papers are encouraged to examine and discuss implications for practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信