Reimagining LGBTIQ+ research – Acknowledging differences across subpopulations, methods, and countries

IF 4 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Tabea Hässler, Nicole Theiss Fogwell, Alejandra Gonzalez, Joel R. Anderson, S. Atwood
{"title":"Reimagining LGBTIQ+ research – Acknowledging differences across subpopulations, methods, and countries","authors":"Tabea Hässler,&nbsp;Nicole Theiss Fogwell,&nbsp;Alejandra Gonzalez,&nbsp;Joel R. Anderson,&nbsp;S. Atwood","doi":"10.1111/josi.12643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Inequalities and discrimination based on gender identity, sexual orientation, and sex characteristics remain pervasive worldwide. Scholars have collaborated to address structural and social barriers in LGBTIQ+ research, creating a substantial literature base. However, much of this work focuses on specific segments of the population, overlooks resilience- and strengths-based approaches, and is predominantly conducted in the U.S. and other Western countries. In this introduction article, we discuss how this special issue extends previous research by uniting scholars globally to collaboratively reimagine the lens through which scientists conduct LGBTIQ+ research. By exploring diverging needs across subgroups of LGBTIQ+ people, discussing the (dis)advantages of various methodological choices, and offering a better understanding of how unique legal and social landscapes affect LGBTIQ+ individuals globally, this special issue aims to provide a comprehensive picture of the current state of research combined with concrete directions for redress. Given that barriers to conducting LGBTIQ+ research differ significantly by nation, we conclude this introductory article by calling for a research community that is more aware of unequal power dynamics within academia, willing to take action to reduce disparities in the global academic system, and inclusive of voices from underrepresented groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"80 3","pages":"821-842"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.12643","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.12643","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inequalities and discrimination based on gender identity, sexual orientation, and sex characteristics remain pervasive worldwide. Scholars have collaborated to address structural and social barriers in LGBTIQ+ research, creating a substantial literature base. However, much of this work focuses on specific segments of the population, overlooks resilience- and strengths-based approaches, and is predominantly conducted in the U.S. and other Western countries. In this introduction article, we discuss how this special issue extends previous research by uniting scholars globally to collaboratively reimagine the lens through which scientists conduct LGBTIQ+ research. By exploring diverging needs across subgroups of LGBTIQ+ people, discussing the (dis)advantages of various methodological choices, and offering a better understanding of how unique legal and social landscapes affect LGBTIQ+ individuals globally, this special issue aims to provide a comprehensive picture of the current state of research combined with concrete directions for redress. Given that barriers to conducting LGBTIQ+ research differ significantly by nation, we conclude this introductory article by calling for a research community that is more aware of unequal power dynamics within academia, willing to take action to reduce disparities in the global academic system, and inclusive of voices from underrepresented groups.

重新认识 LGBTIQ+ 研究--承认不同亚人群、方法和国家之间的差异
基于性别认同、性取向和性特征的不平等和歧视在全世界仍然普遍存在。学者们合作解决 LGBTIQ+ 研究中的结构性和社会性障碍,形成了大量的文献基础。然而,这些研究工作大多关注特定人群,忽视了基于恢复力和力量的方法,而且主要在美国和其他西方国家进行。在这篇导言文章中,我们将讨论本特刊如何通过联合全球学者,共同重新构想科学家开展 LGBTIQ+ 研究的视角,从而扩展之前的研究。通过探讨不同 LGBTIQ+ 人群的不同需求,讨论各种方法选择的(不利)优势,更好地了解独特的法律和社会环境如何影响全球的 LGBTIQ+ 个人,本特刊旨在全面介绍研究现状,并提出具体的解决方向。鉴于各国在开展 LGBTIQ+ 研究时遇到的障碍大不相同,我们在这篇介绍性文章的最后呼吁研究界更多地关注学术界中不平等的权力动态,愿意采取行动减少全球学术体系中的差异,并包容代表不足群体的声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信