{"title":"Genetically Predicted Immune Cells Mediate the Association Between Gut Microbiota and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease","authors":"Jia Wang, Bojian Fei, Chao Wang","doi":"10.1155/2024/8242903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Recent evidence increasingly acknowledges the close interrelationship between immunity and gut microbiota (GM) in humans. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between GM and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the specific impact of GM on immune factors in GERD remains largely unexplored. Therefore, we conducted the Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the precise causal relationships and underlying mechanisms linking GM, immunity, and GERD.</p>\n <p><b>Method:</b> We employed the mediation MR utilizing summary statistics derived from Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) data to investigate the causal effects of 207 taxa and 205 bacterial pathways on GERD. The analysis concentrated on 731 immune cell traits as potential mediators. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) approach was the primary analytical method. To ensure robustness, we employed additional MR methods, including Bayesian weighted MR (BWMR), MR-Egger, Weighted Median, Weighted Mode, and Simple Mode. Furthermore, a series of sensitivity analyses, such as the Cochran’s <i>Q</i> test, leave-one-out test, MR-Egger intercept analysis, and MR-PRESSO test, were conducted to ensure the reliability and consistency of the findings.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The study identified three taxa and eight bacterial pathways that exhibited a negative correlation with GERD. Mediation MR analyses indicated that four bacterial pathways influence GERD through four immune cell types acting as mediators. For instance, the “arginine, ornithine, and proline interconversion” pathway was implicated in reducing the risk of GERD via “PDL-1 on CD14- CD16+ monocyte” cells, with a total effect of −0.0484 and a mediation effect of −0.0093. Sensitivity analyses provided additional validation for the reliability of the MR findings.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our study contributes evidence to the close causal relationship between the GM and GERD, emphasizing the possible role of immune cells as mediators. Future research should focus on developing microbiome-oriented therapeutic approaches for managing GERD.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8242903","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8242903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recent evidence increasingly acknowledges the close interrelationship between immunity and gut microbiota (GM) in humans. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between GM and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the specific impact of GM on immune factors in GERD remains largely unexplored. Therefore, we conducted the Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the precise causal relationships and underlying mechanisms linking GM, immunity, and GERD.
Method: We employed the mediation MR utilizing summary statistics derived from Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) data to investigate the causal effects of 207 taxa and 205 bacterial pathways on GERD. The analysis concentrated on 731 immune cell traits as potential mediators. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) approach was the primary analytical method. To ensure robustness, we employed additional MR methods, including Bayesian weighted MR (BWMR), MR-Egger, Weighted Median, Weighted Mode, and Simple Mode. Furthermore, a series of sensitivity analyses, such as the Cochran’s Q test, leave-one-out test, MR-Egger intercept analysis, and MR-PRESSO test, were conducted to ensure the reliability and consistency of the findings.
Results: The study identified three taxa and eight bacterial pathways that exhibited a negative correlation with GERD. Mediation MR analyses indicated that four bacterial pathways influence GERD through four immune cell types acting as mediators. For instance, the “arginine, ornithine, and proline interconversion” pathway was implicated in reducing the risk of GERD via “PDL-1 on CD14- CD16+ monocyte” cells, with a total effect of −0.0484 and a mediation effect of −0.0093. Sensitivity analyses provided additional validation for the reliability of the MR findings.
Conclusion: Our study contributes evidence to the close causal relationship between the GM and GERD, emphasizing the possible role of immune cells as mediators. Future research should focus on developing microbiome-oriented therapeutic approaches for managing GERD.
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.