Unveiling Decoupled Social-Ecological Networks of Great Lake Basin: An Ecosystem Services Approach

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Earths Future Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1029/2024EF004994
Jian Peng, Zimo Zhang, Yifan Lin, Hui Tang, Zihan Xu, Huining Zheng
{"title":"Unveiling Decoupled Social-Ecological Networks of Great Lake Basin: An Ecosystem Services Approach","authors":"Jian Peng,&nbsp;Zimo Zhang,&nbsp;Yifan Lin,&nbsp;Hui Tang,&nbsp;Zihan Xu,&nbsp;Huining Zheng","doi":"10.1029/2024EF004994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the backdrop of climate change and human activities, the complex interactions within the social-ecological system have brought unprecedented challenges to sustainable development. However, there is still a lack of quantitative methods for analyzing the dynamics of the social-ecological system. Here, we introduced a social-ecological network approach incorporating supply and demand of ecosystem services (ESs) as bridges and took the Dongting Lake basin in China as the research area. From 2000 to 2020, we discovered that the number of linkages among meteorological elements and ESs supply decreased from 5 to 0. Along with this, the network density (from 26 to 22) and network connectivity (from 43 to 28) showed the decoupling trends of the social-ecological networks. These results implied the decreasing impacts of meteorological elements and the importance of considering human activities impacts. Based on the average degree analysis of the networks, proportions of cultivated land and forest land were key for ESs supply (both around 0.900), while population density and artificial land proportion were important for the ESs demand (around 0.850 and 0.800, respectively). More management practices are required because these elements have significant impacts on the supply-demand alignments of multiple ESs. We further illustrated the spatial supply-demand mismatches of ESs, along with the negative effects of urbanization. This study highlighted the advantage of integrating the ecosystems services approach into the social-ecological network analysis, and provided policy insights serving for sustainable development of the typical great lake basins.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"12 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF004994","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF004994","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the backdrop of climate change and human activities, the complex interactions within the social-ecological system have brought unprecedented challenges to sustainable development. However, there is still a lack of quantitative methods for analyzing the dynamics of the social-ecological system. Here, we introduced a social-ecological network approach incorporating supply and demand of ecosystem services (ESs) as bridges and took the Dongting Lake basin in China as the research area. From 2000 to 2020, we discovered that the number of linkages among meteorological elements and ESs supply decreased from 5 to 0. Along with this, the network density (from 26 to 22) and network connectivity (from 43 to 28) showed the decoupling trends of the social-ecological networks. These results implied the decreasing impacts of meteorological elements and the importance of considering human activities impacts. Based on the average degree analysis of the networks, proportions of cultivated land and forest land were key for ESs supply (both around 0.900), while population density and artificial land proportion were important for the ESs demand (around 0.850 and 0.800, respectively). More management practices are required because these elements have significant impacts on the supply-demand alignments of multiple ESs. We further illustrated the spatial supply-demand mismatches of ESs, along with the negative effects of urbanization. This study highlighted the advantage of integrating the ecosystems services approach into the social-ecological network analysis, and provided policy insights serving for sustainable development of the typical great lake basins.

Abstract Image

揭示大湖盆地脱钩的社会生态网络:生态系统服务方法
在气候变化和人类活动的背景下,社会生态系统内部复杂的相互作用给可持续发展带来了前所未有的挑战。然而,目前仍缺乏定量分析社会生态系统动态的方法。在此,我们以中国洞庭湖流域为研究区域,引入了以生态系统服务(ES)供需为桥梁的社会-生态网络方法。从 2000 年到 2020 年,我们发现气象要素与生态系统服务供给之间的联系数量从 5 个减少到 0 个,同时,网络密度(从 26 个减少到 22 个)和网络连通性(从 43 个减少到 28 个)也显示出社会生态网络的脱钩趋势。这些结果表明,气象要素的影响在减小,考虑人类活动的影响也很重要。根据网络的平均度分析,耕地和林地的比例对生态系统服务的供给至关重要(均约为 0.900),而人口密度和人工用地的比例对生态系统服务的需求至关重要(分别约为 0.850 和 0.800)。由于这些要素对多种生态系统服务的供需关系有重大影响,因此需要更多的管理实践。我们进一步说明了环境服务的空间供需错配以及城市化的负面影响。本研究强调了将生态系统服务方法融入社会生态网络分析的优势,并为典型大湖流域的可持续发展提供了政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信