Large-Amplitude Inertia Gravity Waves Over Syowa Station: Comparison of PANSY Radar and ERA5 Reanalysis Data

IF 3.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
L. Yoshida, Y. Tomikawa, M. K. Ejiri, M. Tsutsumi, M. Kohma, K. Sato
{"title":"Large-Amplitude Inertia Gravity Waves Over Syowa Station: Comparison of PANSY Radar and ERA5 Reanalysis Data","authors":"L. Yoshida,&nbsp;Y. Tomikawa,&nbsp;M. K. Ejiri,&nbsp;M. Tsutsumi,&nbsp;M. Kohma,&nbsp;K. Sato","doi":"10.1029/2023JD040490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examined large-amplitude inertia gravity waves (GWs) over Syowa Station, Antarctica using the PANSY (Program of the Antarctic Syowa MST/IS) radar data and the latest reanalysis (ECMWF reanalysis v5; ERA5) from October 2015 to September 2016. Focusing on large-amplitude events with large absolute momentum flux (AMF), hodograph analysis was applied to both data to estimate the wave parameters. It showed that the inertia GWs with a downward phase velocity becomes dominant in the stratosphere. Although their vertical wavelengths got shorter with altitude, their intrinsic periods and horizontal wavelengths got longer with altitude. In addition, their southward propagation was predominant in the stratosphere. Although height dependence of the estimated wave parameters is consistent with previous studies investigating inertia GWs over Syowa Station, some features specific to large-amplitude inertia GWs were also observed. The GW features obtained from PANSY were mostly consistent with those from ERA5 except for their amplitudes. Comparison of AMF between PANSY and ERA5 indicated that ERA5 significantly underestimated the AMF by a factor of 5 between 5 and 12.5 km altitudes and more above 12.5 km. Difference of horizontal and vertical wind power spectra between PANSY and ERA5 is quantitatively consistent with the difference of AMF and its height dependence. It was found that underestimation of vertical wind spectra primarily contributed to the underestimation of AMF in ERA5. The greater underestimation of AMF in the stratosphere might be due to larger vertical grid spacing in ERA5 and the shorter vertical wavelengths of the dominant GWs in the stratosphere.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"129 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023JD040490","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023JD040490","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined large-amplitude inertia gravity waves (GWs) over Syowa Station, Antarctica using the PANSY (Program of the Antarctic Syowa MST/IS) radar data and the latest reanalysis (ECMWF reanalysis v5; ERA5) from October 2015 to September 2016. Focusing on large-amplitude events with large absolute momentum flux (AMF), hodograph analysis was applied to both data to estimate the wave parameters. It showed that the inertia GWs with a downward phase velocity becomes dominant in the stratosphere. Although their vertical wavelengths got shorter with altitude, their intrinsic periods and horizontal wavelengths got longer with altitude. In addition, their southward propagation was predominant in the stratosphere. Although height dependence of the estimated wave parameters is consistent with previous studies investigating inertia GWs over Syowa Station, some features specific to large-amplitude inertia GWs were also observed. The GW features obtained from PANSY were mostly consistent with those from ERA5 except for their amplitudes. Comparison of AMF between PANSY and ERA5 indicated that ERA5 significantly underestimated the AMF by a factor of 5 between 5 and 12.5 km altitudes and more above 12.5 km. Difference of horizontal and vertical wind power spectra between PANSY and ERA5 is quantitatively consistent with the difference of AMF and its height dependence. It was found that underestimation of vertical wind spectra primarily contributed to the underestimation of AMF in ERA5. The greater underestimation of AMF in the stratosphere might be due to larger vertical grid spacing in ERA5 and the shorter vertical wavelengths of the dominant GWs in the stratosphere.

Abstract Image

Syowa 站上空的大振幅惯性重力波:PANSY 雷达与ERA5 再分析数据的比较
我们利用PANSY(南极Syowa MST/IS计划)雷达数据和2015年10月至2016年9月的最新再分析数据(ECMWF再分析v5;ERA5)研究了南极Syowa站上空的大振幅惯性重力波(GWs)。针对具有较大绝对动量通量(AMF)的大振幅事件,对这两种数据进行了霍多图分析,以估算波参数。结果表明,相位速度向下的惯性全球大气波在平流层中占主导地位。虽然它们的垂直波长随着高度的升高而变短,但它们的固有周期和水平波长随着高度的升高而变长。此外,它们在平流层中主要向南传播。虽然估算的波参数与高度有关,这与以前在 Syowa 站上空调查惯性全球大气环流的研究结果一致,但也观测到了一些大振幅惯性全球大气环流特有的特征。从 PANSY 中获得的 GW 特征除振幅外与 ERA5 中的特征基本一致。PANSY 和 ERA5 的 AMF 比较表明,ERA5 在 5 至 12.5 千米高度范围内明显低估了 AMF,低估了 5 倍,而在 12.5 千米以上则高估了更多。PANSY 和 ERA5 水平和垂直风功率谱的差异与 AMF 及其高度依赖性的差异在数量上是一致的。研究发现,ERA5 对垂直风能谱的低估是造成 AMF 低估的主要原因。平流层中的风速系数被低估的程度更大,这可能是由于ERA5的垂直网格间距更大,以及平流层中主要全球大气环流的垂直波长更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信