Sohail Khan, Ze Deng, Irfan Ali Phulpoto, Anam Jalil, Bobo Wang, Zhisheng Yu
{"title":"Synergistic Impacts of Wheat Straw on Coal Bio-Methanation: Insights Into Microbial Community Dynamics Toward Nontargeted Metabolomics","authors":"Sohail Khan, Ze Deng, Irfan Ali Phulpoto, Anam Jalil, Bobo Wang, Zhisheng Yu","doi":"10.1155/2024/4676624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Biogenic methane (BM) production from coal is quite limited due to its complex chemical nature, which makes the responsible microbes sensitive to its denaturation. In the current investigation, wheat straw (WS) at different concentrations as a cosubstrate were used with coal to augment methane generation from coal. Results revealed that the codigestion approach significantly enhanced the cumulative methane generation in CS1 (17.25 mmol) (coal:straw, 75:25), which was 59.52%–256.47% higher than the CS2 (coal:straw, 85:15), and WS single digestion, respectively. Moreover, the lowest methane yield (0.295 mmol/g) was achieved from single coal digestion. Particularly, the highest methane content, 68.37% in the collected biogas, was observed in CS1, followed by CS2 (49.53%), WS (44.92%), and coal (3.53%). Microbial community analysis illustrates that <i>Methanobacteriaceae</i> (51.33%) and <i>Methanosarcinaceae</i> (48.66%) were the leading archaeal communities at the peak methanogenic stage in CS1. While the abundant bacteria at this stage were <i>Hungateiclostridiaceae</i> (40.18%), <i>Rhodobacteriaceae</i> (21.40%), and <i>Lentimicrobiaceae</i> (19.20%) in CS1. According to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, several microbes were seen to be attached to the coal surface in CS1 and CS2. Moreover, the nontargeted metabolomic results showed that aromatics, aliphatic, long-chain fatty acids, and alkane (C19–C36) compounds were found to be highly expressed in only coal, CS1, and CS2 reactors compared to WS. In addition, volatile fatty acids (VFAs) analysis showed that acetic acids were abundantly present in CS1 (2,190,175 ng/ml), followed by WS (1,543,492.88 ng/ml), CS2 (1,159,050 ng/ml), and coal (50,998.31 ng/ml). These results promote the significance of using WS as a cosubstrate with coal to enhance methane production, which can be used as a fuel in power plants. Further studies are required to investigate the potential cosubstrate with coal to enhance methane production and identify the specific metabolic pathways involved.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4676624","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4676624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biogenic methane (BM) production from coal is quite limited due to its complex chemical nature, which makes the responsible microbes sensitive to its denaturation. In the current investigation, wheat straw (WS) at different concentrations as a cosubstrate were used with coal to augment methane generation from coal. Results revealed that the codigestion approach significantly enhanced the cumulative methane generation in CS1 (17.25 mmol) (coal:straw, 75:25), which was 59.52%–256.47% higher than the CS2 (coal:straw, 85:15), and WS single digestion, respectively. Moreover, the lowest methane yield (0.295 mmol/g) was achieved from single coal digestion. Particularly, the highest methane content, 68.37% in the collected biogas, was observed in CS1, followed by CS2 (49.53%), WS (44.92%), and coal (3.53%). Microbial community analysis illustrates that Methanobacteriaceae (51.33%) and Methanosarcinaceae (48.66%) were the leading archaeal communities at the peak methanogenic stage in CS1. While the abundant bacteria at this stage were Hungateiclostridiaceae (40.18%), Rhodobacteriaceae (21.40%), and Lentimicrobiaceae (19.20%) in CS1. According to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, several microbes were seen to be attached to the coal surface in CS1 and CS2. Moreover, the nontargeted metabolomic results showed that aromatics, aliphatic, long-chain fatty acids, and alkane (C19–C36) compounds were found to be highly expressed in only coal, CS1, and CS2 reactors compared to WS. In addition, volatile fatty acids (VFAs) analysis showed that acetic acids were abundantly present in CS1 (2,190,175 ng/ml), followed by WS (1,543,492.88 ng/ml), CS2 (1,159,050 ng/ml), and coal (50,998.31 ng/ml). These results promote the significance of using WS as a cosubstrate with coal to enhance methane production, which can be used as a fuel in power plants. Further studies are required to investigate the potential cosubstrate with coal to enhance methane production and identify the specific metabolic pathways involved.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability.
IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents:
-Biofuels and alternatives
-Carbon capturing and storage technologies
-Clean coal technologies
-Energy conversion, conservation and management
-Energy storage
-Energy systems
-Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation
-Hydrogen energy and fuel cells
-Hydrogen production technologies
-Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies
-Nuclear energy
-Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass)
-Smart energy system