Perceptions of Empathy Among Nursing Assistants in Long-Term Care Facilities

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Hsiao-Ling Hu, Chien-Lin Kuo, Shou-Yu Wang, Yeu-Hui Chuang
{"title":"Perceptions of Empathy Among Nursing Assistants in Long-Term Care Facilities","authors":"Hsiao-Ling Hu,&nbsp;Chien-Lin Kuo,&nbsp;Shou-Yu Wang,&nbsp;Yeu-Hui Chuang","doi":"10.1155/2024/3072064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b>​ Empathy is a fundamental component of the therapeutic relationship between healthcare providers and patients and has the potential to yield significant benefits, including heightened care satisfaction, enhanced care quality, and improved mental well-being for patients. As nursing assistants (NAs) are primary direct care providers in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), it is necessary to understand NAs’ views on empathy in their care provision for residents, but a gap exists in the literature regarding NAs’ perspectives on empathy in this context.</p>\n <p><b>Aim:</b> In this study, we aimed to explore perceptions of empathy among NAs in LTCFs.</p>\n <p><b>Research Design:</b> A qualitative approach was applied in this study.</p>\n <p><b>Participants and Research Context:</b> Through purposive and snowball sampling, 18 NAs who provided care for residents in six LTCFs in Taiwan were recruited. Face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted using a semistructured interview guide, and data were analyzed using a content analysis.</p>\n <p><b>Ethical Considerations:</b> Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board. All participants signed a written informed consent form prior to the interview.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Four themes encompassing 11 categories were generated including “being fundamental to caregiving to establish trust and enhance quality care,” “practicing altruistic behavior in the pursuit of ethical caregiving,” “cycling empathic flow in care,” and “facing challenges in delivering empathetic care.”</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> NAs in LTCFs viewed empathy as an essential element of the caregiving process. They saw empathy as selfless care, assistance to others, and alleviation of residents’ suffering. Understanding residents’ emotions, thoughts, and needs, active listening and compassionate engagement were vital to expressing empathy. However, NAs faced challenges in expressing empathy due to demanding tasks, time limitations, and insufficient knowledge and communication skills. In addition, emotional desensitization further complicated the provision of empathic care. The findings of this study can provide information for nurse managers and directors to understand NAs’ perspectives on empathy and difficulties when providing empathic care in the long-term care context.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/3072064","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/3072064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:​ Empathy is a fundamental component of the therapeutic relationship between healthcare providers and patients and has the potential to yield significant benefits, including heightened care satisfaction, enhanced care quality, and improved mental well-being for patients. As nursing assistants (NAs) are primary direct care providers in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), it is necessary to understand NAs’ views on empathy in their care provision for residents, but a gap exists in the literature regarding NAs’ perspectives on empathy in this context.

Aim: In this study, we aimed to explore perceptions of empathy among NAs in LTCFs.

Research Design: A qualitative approach was applied in this study.

Participants and Research Context: Through purposive and snowball sampling, 18 NAs who provided care for residents in six LTCFs in Taiwan were recruited. Face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted using a semistructured interview guide, and data were analyzed using a content analysis.

Ethical Considerations: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board. All participants signed a written informed consent form prior to the interview.

Results: Four themes encompassing 11 categories were generated including “being fundamental to caregiving to establish trust and enhance quality care,” “practicing altruistic behavior in the pursuit of ethical caregiving,” “cycling empathic flow in care,” and “facing challenges in delivering empathetic care.”

Conclusions: NAs in LTCFs viewed empathy as an essential element of the caregiving process. They saw empathy as selfless care, assistance to others, and alleviation of residents’ suffering. Understanding residents’ emotions, thoughts, and needs, active listening and compassionate engagement were vital to expressing empathy. However, NAs faced challenges in expressing empathy due to demanding tasks, time limitations, and insufficient knowledge and communication skills. In addition, emotional desensitization further complicated the provision of empathic care. The findings of this study can provide information for nurse managers and directors to understand NAs’ perspectives on empathy and difficulties when providing empathic care in the long-term care context.

长期护理机构护理助理对移情的看法
背景:移情是医疗服务提供者与患者之间治疗关系的基本组成部分,有可能产生显著的益处,包括提高护理满意度、提高护理质量和改善患者的心理健康。由于护理助理(NAs)是长期护理机构(LTCFs)中的主要直接护理人员,因此有必要了解护理助理在为居民提供护理服务时对移情的看法。 研究目的:本研究旨在探讨长者照护中心的护理人员对同理心的看法。 研究设计:本研究采用定性方法。 参与者和研究背景:通过目的性抽样和滚雪球抽样,我们招募了18名在台湾六家长者照护中心为院友提供照护服务的护理人员。采用半结构化访谈指南进行面对面深度访谈,并采用内容分析法对数据进行分析。 伦理考虑:已获得机构审查委员会的伦理批准。所有参与者在访谈前都签署了书面知情同意书。 结果产生了包含 11 个类别的四个主题,包括 "作为护理工作的基础,以建立信任并提高护理质量"、"在追求道德护理的过程中实践利他行为"、"在护理中循环移情流动 "以及 "在提供移情护理时面临挑战"。 结论长者照护中心的护理人员将移情视为护理过程中的一个基本要素。他们认为同理心是无私的关怀、对他人的帮助以及减轻院友的痛苦。理解住客的情绪、想法和需求,积极倾听和富有同情心的参与对于表达同理心至关重要。然而,由于任务繁重、时间有限、知识和沟通技巧不足,新来港定居人士在表达同理心方面面临挑战。此外,情绪脱敏也使移情护理的提供变得更加复杂。本研究的结果可为护士管理者和主任提供信息,以了解护理人员对同理心的看法以及在长期护理环境中提供同理心护理时遇到的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信