Exploring Storm Intensities and the Implications on Green Stormwater Infrastructure Design

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Achira Amur, Bridget Wadzuk, Robert Traver
{"title":"Exploring Storm Intensities and the Implications on Green Stormwater Infrastructure Design","authors":"Achira Amur,&nbsp;Bridget Wadzuk,&nbsp;Robert Traver","doi":"10.1002/hyp.15333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The peak intensity that occurs during a storm event can drive the performance of a green stormwater infrastructure (GSI), which may or may not align with the expected performance of the GSI. Both the peak intensity volume and where it occurs within an event are found to influence the GSI response. The design criteria set the expectation of how well a GSI will manage stormwater within a watershed. The Villanova University bioinfiltration rain garden (BRG) has been monitored since 2003, providing a long hydrological data record that is used to study local and observed rainfall patterns in comparison to design criteria to understand the impact of storm intensity on GSI performance. Intensities for all the storms recorded at the site were assessed at different timesteps and compared to the intensities typically used by the design storm approach in meeting regulatory criteria. There were 1482 storm events analysed and for all timesteps, the values commonly used for meeting design regulations were seen to be well above what was observed at the BRG, with 98% of the storms occurring below these values. Out of the 1482 storms, only 46 storms (3%) had effective durations longer than 10 h and no storm observed had an effective duration longer than 22 h, yet their peak intensities were still below the peak intensity associated with design regulations. This finding highlights the difference in the duration these sites are designed to manage (typically 24 h), in comparison to the ones experienced by the systems. The peak intensity analysis done at the different timesteps shows that for the storms recorded at the BRG, the intensities vary with changing time intervals and events. Of all the assessed events, only two events recorded larger intensities than the regionally specified NOAA C design storm, demonstrating the skewness of the approach. There was no trend in peak rain intensities over the 20-year rainfall record. This study concludes that due to their dynamic performance, vegetated GSI have a natural resilience to a variety of precipitation patterns and climate changes that may be compromised when designing to a static value set through design storms.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"38 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.15333","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The peak intensity that occurs during a storm event can drive the performance of a green stormwater infrastructure (GSI), which may or may not align with the expected performance of the GSI. Both the peak intensity volume and where it occurs within an event are found to influence the GSI response. The design criteria set the expectation of how well a GSI will manage stormwater within a watershed. The Villanova University bioinfiltration rain garden (BRG) has been monitored since 2003, providing a long hydrological data record that is used to study local and observed rainfall patterns in comparison to design criteria to understand the impact of storm intensity on GSI performance. Intensities for all the storms recorded at the site were assessed at different timesteps and compared to the intensities typically used by the design storm approach in meeting regulatory criteria. There were 1482 storm events analysed and for all timesteps, the values commonly used for meeting design regulations were seen to be well above what was observed at the BRG, with 98% of the storms occurring below these values. Out of the 1482 storms, only 46 storms (3%) had effective durations longer than 10 h and no storm observed had an effective duration longer than 22 h, yet their peak intensities were still below the peak intensity associated with design regulations. This finding highlights the difference in the duration these sites are designed to manage (typically 24 h), in comparison to the ones experienced by the systems. The peak intensity analysis done at the different timesteps shows that for the storms recorded at the BRG, the intensities vary with changing time intervals and events. Of all the assessed events, only two events recorded larger intensities than the regionally specified NOAA C design storm, demonstrating the skewness of the approach. There was no trend in peak rain intensities over the 20-year rainfall record. This study concludes that due to their dynamic performance, vegetated GSI have a natural resilience to a variety of precipitation patterns and climate changes that may be compromised when designing to a static value set through design storms.

Abstract Image

探索风暴强度及其对绿色雨水基础设施设计的影响
暴雨事件中出现的峰值强度会影响绿色雨水基础设施(GSI)的性能,这可能与 GSI 的预期性能一致,也可能不一致。在暴雨事件中,峰值强度和峰值强度发生的位置都会影响 GSI 的响应。设计标准设定了 GSI 在流域内管理雨水的预期效果。维拉诺瓦大学的生物渗透雨水花园 (BRG) 自 2003 年以来一直受到监测,提供了长期的水文数据记录,用于研究当地和观测到的降雨模式,并与设计标准进行比较,以了解暴雨强度对 GSI 性能的影响。对现场记录的所有暴雨强度进行了不同时间步长的评估,并与设计暴雨方法在满足监管标准时通常使用的强度进行了比较。共分析了 1482 次暴雨事件,在所有时间步骤中,通常用于满足设计规范的暴雨强度值都远高于在生物圈保护区观测到的暴雨强度值,98% 的暴雨强度都低于这些值。在 1482 个暴雨中,只有 46 个暴雨(3%)的有效持续时间超过 10 小时,没有观测到有效持续时间超过 22 小时的暴雨,但其峰值强度仍低于设计规定的峰值强度。这一结果凸显了这些站点设计管理的持续时间(通常为 24 小时)与系统所经历的持续时间之间的差异。在不同时间段进行的峰值强度分析表明,在 BRG 记录的暴雨中,强度随时间间隔和事件的变化而变化。在所有评估的事件中,只有两个事件的强度大于该地区指定的 NOAA C 设计暴雨强度,这表明了该方法的偏斜性。在 20 年的降雨记录中,峰值雨强没有变化趋势。这项研究的结论是,由于植被 GSI 的动态性能,它对各种降水模式和气候变化具有天然的适应能力,而如果按照设计暴雨的静态值进行设计,则可能会损害这种适应能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信