Climate, predation, and the controls of island lizard abundance and community structure

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70053
Edita Folfas, D. Luke Mahler, Luke O. Frishkoff
{"title":"Climate, predation, and the controls of island lizard abundance and community structure","authors":"Edita Folfas,&nbsp;D. Luke Mahler,&nbsp;Luke O. Frishkoff","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Alternative ecological theories make divergent predictions about the relationship between predators and their prey. If predators exert top-down ecosystem control, increases in predation should diminish prey abundance and could either diminish or enhance community diversity of prey species. However, if bottom-up ecosystem controls predominate, predator populations should track underlying variation in prey diversity and abundance, which ultimately should reflect available energy. Past research, both across islands and comparing islands with the mainland, has frequently invoked the importance of predation in regulating lizard abundance and diversity, suggesting an important role of top-down control when predators are present. However, others have posited a stronger role of food limitation, via competition or bottom-up forces. If top-down control predominates, then negative correlations between prey abundance and predator occurrence should emerge within and among islands. Using data from eBird, we inferred landscape-level presence data for bird species on the islands of Jamaica and Hispaniola. By summing occurrence probabilities of all known anole-predator birds, we estimated total avian predation pressure and combined these estimates with anole community data from a mark-recapture study that spanned spatial and climatic gradients on both islands. Avian predators and anole lizards were both affected by climate, with total predator occurrence, anole abundance and anole species richness increasing with mean annual temperature. Anole abundance and predator occurrence showed a curvilinear relationship, where abundance and predator occurrence increased together until predator occurrence became sufficiently high that anole abundance was negatively impacted. This indicates that bottom-up ecosystem controls drive richness of both anoles and their predators, mitigating the negative effects predators might have on their prey, at least until predator occurrence reaches a threshold. We did not detect consistent evidence of predator occurrence reducing anole community richness. These findings support past research showing that islands with more predators tend to have lower prey abundances, but it does not seem that these top-down forces are strongly limiting species coexistence. Instead, bottom-up forces linked with climate may be more important drivers of diversity in both lizards and their avian predators on these islands.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70053","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative ecological theories make divergent predictions about the relationship between predators and their prey. If predators exert top-down ecosystem control, increases in predation should diminish prey abundance and could either diminish or enhance community diversity of prey species. However, if bottom-up ecosystem controls predominate, predator populations should track underlying variation in prey diversity and abundance, which ultimately should reflect available energy. Past research, both across islands and comparing islands with the mainland, has frequently invoked the importance of predation in regulating lizard abundance and diversity, suggesting an important role of top-down control when predators are present. However, others have posited a stronger role of food limitation, via competition or bottom-up forces. If top-down control predominates, then negative correlations between prey abundance and predator occurrence should emerge within and among islands. Using data from eBird, we inferred landscape-level presence data for bird species on the islands of Jamaica and Hispaniola. By summing occurrence probabilities of all known anole-predator birds, we estimated total avian predation pressure and combined these estimates with anole community data from a mark-recapture study that spanned spatial and climatic gradients on both islands. Avian predators and anole lizards were both affected by climate, with total predator occurrence, anole abundance and anole species richness increasing with mean annual temperature. Anole abundance and predator occurrence showed a curvilinear relationship, where abundance and predator occurrence increased together until predator occurrence became sufficiently high that anole abundance was negatively impacted. This indicates that bottom-up ecosystem controls drive richness of both anoles and their predators, mitigating the negative effects predators might have on their prey, at least until predator occurrence reaches a threshold. We did not detect consistent evidence of predator occurrence reducing anole community richness. These findings support past research showing that islands with more predators tend to have lower prey abundances, but it does not seem that these top-down forces are strongly limiting species coexistence. Instead, bottom-up forces linked with climate may be more important drivers of diversity in both lizards and their avian predators on these islands.

Abstract Image

气候、捕食以及对岛屿蜥蜴数量和群落结构的控制
不同的生态理论对捕食者与猎物之间的关系做出了不同的预测。如果捕食者能自上而下地控制生态系统,那么捕食的增加就会减少猎物的丰度,并可能减少或增加猎物物种的群落多样性。然而,如果自下而上的生态系统控制占主导地位,那么捕食者的数量就应该跟踪猎物多样性和丰度的潜在变化,而猎物多样性和丰度最终应该反映可利用的能量。过去的研究,无论是跨岛屿研究还是岛屿与大陆的比较研究,都经常提到捕食在调节蜥蜴数量和多样性方面的重要性,这表明当捕食者存在时,自上而下的控制起着重要作用。不过,也有人认为食物限制通过竞争或自下而上的力量发挥了更大的作用。如果自上而下的控制占主导地位,那么在岛屿内部和岛屿之间,猎物丰度与捕食者出现率之间就会出现负相关。利用 eBird 的数据,我们推断出了牙买加岛和伊斯帕尼奥拉岛上鸟类物种的景观级出现数据。通过对所有已知的捕食 anole 的鸟类的出现概率进行加总,我们估算出了鸟类捕食的总压力,并将这些估算结果与一项跨越两个岛屿的空间和气候梯度的标记再捕获研究中获得的anole 群落数据相结合。鸟类捕食者和踝蜥都受到气候的影响,捕食者总出现率、踝蜥丰度和踝蜥物种丰富度都随着年平均气温的升高而增加。鼹形蜥蜴的丰度与捕食者的出现呈曲线关系,即丰度和捕食者的出现同时增加,直到捕食者的出现达到足以对鼹形蜥蜴的丰度产生负面影响的程度。这表明,自下而上的生态系统控制推动了鳗鲡及其捕食者的丰富度,减轻了捕食者可能对其猎物造成的负面影响,至少在捕食者出现率达到阈值之前是这样。我们没有发现捕食者的出现降低了 anole 群落丰富度的一致证据。这些发现支持了过去的研究,即捕食者较多的岛屿猎物丰度往往较低,但这些自上而下的力量似乎并没有强烈地限制物种的共存。相反,与气候相关的自下而上的力量可能是这些岛屿上蜥蜴及其鸟类捕食者多样性的更重要的驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信