Liana versus tree seedling responses to spatial and temporal variation in dry season severity

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70058
Sergio Estrada-Villegas, Luke Browne, Eric Manzané-Pinzón, Liza S. Comita
{"title":"Liana versus tree seedling responses to spatial and temporal variation in dry season severity","authors":"Sergio Estrada-Villegas,&nbsp;Luke Browne,&nbsp;Eric Manzané-Pinzón,&nbsp;Liza S. Comita","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lianas are key components of tropical forests, particularly at sites with more severe dry seasons. In contrast, trees are more abundant and speciose in wetter areas. The seasonal growth advantage (SGA) hypothesis postulates that such contrasting distributions are produced by higher liana growth relative to trees during seasonal droughts. The SGA has been investigated for larger size classes (e.g., ≥5 cm diameter at 1.3 m, dbh), but rarely for seedlings. Using eight annual censuses of &gt;12,000 seedlings of 483 tree and liana species conducted at eight 1-ha plots spanning a strong rainfall gradient in central Panama, we evaluated whether liana seedlings had higher growth and/or survival rates than tree seedlings at sites with stronger droughts. We also tested whether an extreme El Niño drought during the study period had a more negative effect on tree compared to liana seedlings. The absolute density of liana seedlings was similar across the rainfall gradient, ranging from 0.32 individuals/m<sup>2</sup> (0.20–0.49, 95% credible interval [CI]) at the driest end of the gradient and 0.27 individuals/m<sup>2</sup> (0.13–0.51 95% CI) at the wettest end of the gradient. The relative density of liana seedlings compared to tree seedlings was higher at sites with stronger dry seasons (0.27, 0.21–0.33, 95% CI), compared to wetter sites (0.12, 0.04–0.20 95% CI), due to lower tree seedling densities at drier sites. However, liana seedlings did not grow or survive better than tree seedlings in drier sites compared to wetter sites. Tree seedlings were more negatively impacted in terms of mortality by the extreme El Niño drought than liana seedlings, with an increase in annual mortality rate of 0.013 (0.003–0.025 95% CI) compared to lianas of −0.009 (−0.028 to 0.008 95% CI), but not growth. Our results indicate that lianas do not have a SGA over trees at the seedling stage. Instead, higher survival of liana versus tree seedlings during severe droughts or differences in liana versus tree fecundity or germination across the rainfall gradient likely explain why liana seedlings have higher relative densities at drier sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70058","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lianas are key components of tropical forests, particularly at sites with more severe dry seasons. In contrast, trees are more abundant and speciose in wetter areas. The seasonal growth advantage (SGA) hypothesis postulates that such contrasting distributions are produced by higher liana growth relative to trees during seasonal droughts. The SGA has been investigated for larger size classes (e.g., ≥5 cm diameter at 1.3 m, dbh), but rarely for seedlings. Using eight annual censuses of >12,000 seedlings of 483 tree and liana species conducted at eight 1-ha plots spanning a strong rainfall gradient in central Panama, we evaluated whether liana seedlings had higher growth and/or survival rates than tree seedlings at sites with stronger droughts. We also tested whether an extreme El Niño drought during the study period had a more negative effect on tree compared to liana seedlings. The absolute density of liana seedlings was similar across the rainfall gradient, ranging from 0.32 individuals/m2 (0.20–0.49, 95% credible interval [CI]) at the driest end of the gradient and 0.27 individuals/m2 (0.13–0.51 95% CI) at the wettest end of the gradient. The relative density of liana seedlings compared to tree seedlings was higher at sites with stronger dry seasons (0.27, 0.21–0.33, 95% CI), compared to wetter sites (0.12, 0.04–0.20 95% CI), due to lower tree seedling densities at drier sites. However, liana seedlings did not grow or survive better than tree seedlings in drier sites compared to wetter sites. Tree seedlings were more negatively impacted in terms of mortality by the extreme El Niño drought than liana seedlings, with an increase in annual mortality rate of 0.013 (0.003–0.025 95% CI) compared to lianas of −0.009 (−0.028 to 0.008 95% CI), but not growth. Our results indicate that lianas do not have a SGA over trees at the seedling stage. Instead, higher survival of liana versus tree seedlings during severe droughts or differences in liana versus tree fecundity or germination across the rainfall gradient likely explain why liana seedlings have higher relative densities at drier sites.

Abstract Image

藤本植物与树苗对旱季严重程度时空变化的反应
藤本植物是热带森林的重要组成部分,尤其是在旱季较为严重的地方。相比之下,树木在较潮湿的地区更为茂盛,种类也更多。季节性生长优势(SGA)假说认为,在季节性干旱期间,藤本植物比树木生长得更旺盛,从而形成了这种截然不同的分布。人们已经对较大尺寸等级(例如,1.3 米处直径≥5 厘米,dbh)的 SGA 进行了研究,但很少对幼苗进行研究。我们在巴拿马中部降雨梯度较大的8个1公顷地块对483种树木和藤本植物的12000株幼苗进行了8次年度普查,评估了在干旱较严重的地区,藤本植物幼苗的生长率和/或存活率是否高于树木幼苗。我们还测试了在研究期间发生的厄尔尼诺极端干旱对乔木幼苗的负面影响是否大于对藤本植物幼苗的影响。在降雨梯度上,藤本植物幼苗的绝对密度相似,在梯度最干旱的一端为0.32株/平方米(0.20-0.49,95%可信区间[CI]),在梯度最潮湿的一端为0.27株/平方米(0.13-0.51,95%可信区间[CI])。在旱季较强的地点,藤本植物幼苗的相对密度高于乔木幼苗(0.27, 0.21-0.33, 95% CI),而在较湿润的地点,藤本植物幼苗的相对密度低于乔木幼苗(0.12, 0.04-0.20 95% CI),这是因为在较干旱的地点,乔木幼苗的密度较低。然而,与较潮湿的地点相比,较干燥地点的藤本植物幼苗的生长或存活率并不比树木幼苗高。与藤本植物相比,乔木幼苗受到厄尔尼诺极端干旱的负面影响更大,年死亡率增加了0.013(0.003-0.025 95% CI),而藤本植物的年死亡率则增加了-0.009(-0.028-0.008 95% CI),但增长率却没有增加。我们的结果表明,在幼苗阶段,藤本植物并不比乔木具有 SGA。相反,在严重干旱时,藤本植物与乔木幼苗相比存活率更高,或者在整个降雨梯度上,藤本植物与乔木的繁殖力或发芽率存在差异,这可能解释了为什么藤本植物幼苗在更干旱的地点具有更高的相对密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信